Skip to content

· Public charity

Tiger Woods Foundation Inc

The mission of tiger woods foundation (dba tgr foundation) is to empower students to pursue their passions through education.

$2.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$800k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$4.0MPhilanthropy$2.2MRecreation & Sports$1.9MPublic Safety & Disaster$1.2MEducation$974kEnvironment$250kArts & Culture$250kHuman Services$225kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $1,906,921, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,113,082 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $206,161 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $67k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.6M
$50,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$159M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LULU'S PLACE INC$800,000
GENESIS INSPIRATION FOUNDATION$514,085
TAVISTOCK FOUNDATION$320,000
BAHAMAS YOUTH FOUNDATION$150,000
WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY$50,000
PRIDE BOOSTER CLUB INC PAUL REVERE MIDDLE SCHOOL$25,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$14,085
CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION$14,085
AMERICAN RED CROSS$14,085
ATLANTA PARTNERSHIP OF BUSINESS AND EDUCATION$5,581
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $14k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
WY
OH
CA
VA
MD
NC
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 12 repeat orgs$379k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
14

Total granted

$13M
$331k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+51%

Still filing today

83%
93%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GI
    Genesis Inspiration Foundation
    7× · 2019–2025 · $3.3M · revenue +224% · 47% of their budget
  • TJ
    THE J PAUL GETTY TRUST
    3× · 2017–2019 · $1.0M · revenue +48%
  • RL
    RISING LEADERS OF NORTH FLORIDA INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $714k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • PU
    PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +51%
  • CJ
    COWBOY JOE CLUB
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +14%
  • THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +80%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
2
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
3
Western Athletic Conference

The conference is committed to providing student-athletes an exemplary university experience - both on and off the field of play. with high standards of integrity at the core of our athletic and academic excellences, our goal is to unlock…

Recreation & Sports
4
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University

Stanford university is one of a select group of american universities that have achieved eminence in both undergraduate and graduate education and research - cont'd sch o.

Education
5
University of South Florida Foundation Inc

University of South Florida Foundation, Inc.'s mission is to provide charitable and educational aid to the University of South Florida; to promote education and other related activities of the University; and to encourage research,…

Education
6
University of California San Francisco Foundation

Organization's mission ====================== the university of california, san francisco(ucsf) is among the world's leading universities dedicated to advancing health worldwide through biomedical research, graduate-level education in the…

Education
7
Carolinas Golf Foundation

The carolinas golf foundation was formed by the carolinas golf association in 1977 to provide scholarships and funding for a variety of carolinas-based golf initiatives.

—
8
University of Central Florida Foundation Inc

The ucf foundation encourages, stewards and celebrates charitable contributions from alumni and friends to support university of central florida (ucf).

Education
9
University Athletic Association Inc

Provide a championship experience with integrity on and off the field for student-athletes and the gator nation.

Recreation & Sports
10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
11
Usga Foundation

The foundation is dedicated to fulfilling the usga's mission to champion and advance the game of golf, everywhere it is played. its purpose is soley charitable, scientific, and educational within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the…

Recreation & Sports
12
The University of Florida Foundation Inc

The mission of the university of florida foundation, inc. is to exclusively support and enhance the university of florida, a comprehensive learning institution built on a land-grant foundation, in its mission of "excellence in education…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rising Leaders of North Florida Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tavistock Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/30
Grantees still filing
19/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Genesis Inspiration Foundation: $3,264,085 · Youth DevelopmentGenesis Inspiration Foundati…+1 more: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentTAVISTOCK FOUNDATION INC: $2,200,000 · PhilanthropyTAVISTOCK FOUNDATION INCTHE J PAUL GETTY TRUST: $1,000,000 · PhilanthropyTHE J PAUL GETTY TRUST+2 more: $20,000 · PhilanthropyLULU'S PLACE INC: $1,800,000 · Recreation & SportsLULU'S PLACE INCRISING LEADERS OF NORTH FLORIDA INC: $714,290 · Recreation & SportsRISING LEADERS OF NORTH FL…WORLD GOLF FOUNDATION INC: $476,200 · Recreation & SportsWORLD GOLF FOUNDATION INC+1 more: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsBAHAMAS YOUTH FOUNDATION USA INC: $1,302,500 · EducationBAHAMAS YOUTH FOUNDATI…PAUL REVERE PRIDE BOOSTER CLUB: $915,000 · EducationPAUL REVERE PRIDE BOOS…WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · Education+9 more: $246,581 · Education+9 moreFIRST TEE OF LOS ANGELES: $600,000 · OtherGolf Coaches Association of America Inc: $110,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · OtherCONNELLY SCHOOL OF THE HOLY CHILD: $27,600 · Other+1 more: $14,085 · OtherSOUTHWESTERN INVITATIONAL GOLF TOURNAMENT: $25,000 · HealthLUKE'S WINGS: $10,000 · HealthWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $14,085 · InternationalAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $14,085 · Human Services
Youth Development$3,289,085Philanthropy$3,220,000Recreation & Sports$3,000,490Education$2,564,081Other$801,685Health$35,000International$14,085Human Services$14,085

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGenesis Inspiration Foundation: $3,264,085 over 7y, 47% of budgetTAVISTOCK FOUNDATION INC: $2,200,000 over 7y, 49% of budgetLULU'S PLACE INC: $1,800,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetBAHAMAS YOUTH FOUNDATION USA INC: $1,302,500 over 5y, 95% of budgetTHE J PAUL GETTY TRUST: $1,000,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPAUL REVERE PRIDE BOOSTER CLUB: $915,000 over 9y, 24% of budgetRISING LEADERS OF NORTH FLORIDA INC: $714,290 over 5y, 14% of budgetFIRST TEE OF LOS ANGELES: $600,000 over 3y, 36% of budgetWORLD GOLF FOUNDATION INC: $476,200 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetGolf Coaches Association of America Inc: $110,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOWBOY JOE CLUB: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TOWER FOUNDATION OF SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $14,085 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUKE'S WINGS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOUR MILITARY KIDS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetENVISION EXCELLENCE IN STEM EDUCATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWASHINGTON REGIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GRANTMAKERS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCAMERON CHAMP FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetATLANTA PARTNERSHIP OF BUSINESS AND EDUCATION INC: $5,581 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBoise State University Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pga Tour IncFL15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pga Tour Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tiger Woods Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tiger Woods Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tiger Woods’ filings →

    More from the funding graph