· Public charity
Tiger Woods Foundation Inc
At tiger woods foundation (dba tgr foundation), we envision a world where opportunity is universal, and potential is limitless.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $1,900,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,092,848 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $192,848 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $380k
- $250k+2 grants · $1.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LULU'S PLACE INC | $1,000,000 |
| GENESIS INSPIRATION FOUNDATION | $500,000 |
| BAHAMAS YOUTH FOUNDATION | $150,000 |
| PRIDE BOOSTER CLUB INC PAUL REVERE MIDDLE SCHOOL | $115,000 |
| TAVISTOCK FOUNDATION | $115,000 |
| GOLF COACHES ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA | $15,000 |
| BOISE STATE UNIVERISTY FOUNDATION INC | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GIGenesis Inspiration Foundation6× · 2019–2024 · $2.8M · revenue +224% · 47% of their budget
- TJTHE J PAUL GETTY TRUST3× · 2017–2019 · $1.0M · revenue +48%
- RLRISING LEADERS OF NORTH FLORIDA INC5× · 2017–2021 · $714k · revenue +53%
Funded once
- PUPEPPERDINE UNIVERSITYgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +51%
- CJCOWBOY JOE CLUBone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +14%
- TTTHE TOWER FOUNDATION OF SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITYgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +85%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…
Stanford university is one of a select group of american universities that have achieved eminence in both undergraduate and graduate education and research - cont'd sch o.
To function as a supporting organization in the furtherance of the charitable activities, educational programs for youth, and the goals of the tiger woods foundation, inc., a publicly supported organization formed and qualified under…
Provide a championship experience with integrity on and off the field for student-athletes and the gator nation.
The united states golf association champions and advances the game of golf. it serves millions of golfers and thousands of golf courses both within the united states and around the world through programs and services that promote a…
Mission statement of washington and lee university: washington and lee university provides a liberal arts education that develops students' capacity to think freely, critically, and humanely and to conduct themselves with honor, integrity,…
Promote education by contributing to support and maintenance of schools, colleges and universities by contributing to the support and education of women students and the establishing of financial endowments, fellowships, scholarships, etc…
The primary purpose of the association is to promote the educational programs of georgia tech through student body participation in "healthful exercises, recreations, athletic games and contests". the association "develops the young people…
The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.
Support men's and women's intercollegiate golf programs at SMU
The foundation is dedicated to fulfilling the usga's mission to champion and advance the game of golf, everywhere it is played. its purpose is soley charitable, scientific, and educational within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rising Leaders of North Florida Inc and the most unlike its peers is Tavistock Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Genesis Inspiration Foundation ↗
- Who funds TAVISTOCK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BAHAMAS YOUTH FOUNDATION USA INC ↗
- Who funds LULU'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds THE J PAUL GETTY TRUST ↗
- Who funds PAUL REVERE PRIDE BOOSTER CLUB ↗
- Who funds RISING LEADERS OF NORTH FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds FIRST TEE OF LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds WORLD GOLF FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Golf Coaches Association of America Inc ↗
- Who funds PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds COWBOY JOE CLUB ↗
- Who funds THE TOWER FOUNDATION OF SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWESTERN INVITATIONAL GOLF TOURNAMENT ↗
- Who funds CHRIS PAUL FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CAMERON CHAMP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OUR MILITARY KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds ENVISION EXCELLENCE IN STEM EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON REGIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GRANTMAKERS ↗
- Who funds LUKE'S WINGS ↗
- Who funds Boise State University Foundation Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Pga Tour Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tiger Woods Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.