Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Tietjen Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$892k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$629k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Religion$2.2MFood & Nutrition$111kHuman Services$88kEducation$62kPhilanthropy$57kArts & Culture$27kInternational$16kHealth$9kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $33k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $220k
  • $250k+1 grant · $629k
$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LUTHERAN SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY CHICAGO$629,000
TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH$155,000
Individual grant recipient$65,000
LUTHERAN FAM & CHILDRENS SERVICE$22,500
OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL$10,000
EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF AMERICA$3,000
NURSES FOR NEWBORNS$2,500
CHILDREN OF GRACE$1,000
LUTHERAN DISASTER RESPONSE$1,000
CROSSINGS$1,000
GATEWAY 180 HOMELESS SERVICES$500
Individual grant recipient$500
LUTHERAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ASSOCIATION$250
BAILEY-MATTHEWS NATIONAL SHELL MUSEUM& AQUARIUM$250
ALL AMONG US$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 11% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GATEWAY 180 HOMELESS SERVICES: $500 → 21%Gateway 180: $500 → 21%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $3k → 11%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $3k → 11%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $3k → 11%LUTHERAN SENIOR SERVICES: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.2M · 19 repeat orgs$442k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
11

Total granted

$2.2M
$405k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+40%

Still filing today

26%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NF
    NURSES FOR NEWBORNS
    3× · 2021–2024 · $8k · revenue +34%
  • WO
    WINGS OF HOPE
    3× · 2021–2023 · $4k · revenue +1%
  • CO
    CHILDREN OF GRACE
    2× · 2022–2024 · $2k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • LS
    LUTHERAN SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY
    one grant, 2019 · $350k
  • MA
    MARSHALLTOWN ARTS AND CIVIC CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • LS
    LUTHERAN SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY OF CHIC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lutheran Social Services of the South Inc

Our mission is to break the cycle of child abuse by empowering children, families and communities.

Human Services
2
Lutheran Family Services of Ne Inc

Lutheran family services of nebraska, inc.'s (lfs) mission is to express god's love for all people by providing quality human care services that build and strengthen individual, family and community life. our vision is saftey, hope and…

Human Services
3
Lutheran Immigration & Refugee Service Inc Dba Global Refuge

Witnessing to god's love for all people, we stand with and advocate for migrants and refugees, transforming communities through ministries of service and justice.

4
Wisconsin Lutheran Home Ministries Inc

To share christ's love as we serve the spiritual, physical, intellectual and emotional needs of people entrusted to our care and others whose lives we touch.

5
Lutheran Family Services in the Carolinas

See schedule o lutheran family services in the carolinas (lfs) is dedicated to one simple goal, improving the lives of the most vulnerable populations in north and south carolina. the lfs mission statement is, "empowered by christ, we walk…

Human Services
6
Legacy Visiting Nurse Association

Legacy Visiting Nurse Association (LVNA) provides palliative care to terminally ill patients and supportive services to patients, their families, and significant others, through an outpatient hospice program. The home hospice program…

Health
7
Choices Coordinated Care Solutions Inc

To strengthen youth and families while enhancing systems and communities.

Human Services
8
Cincinnati Union Bethel

Empowering women to break the cycles of poverty, addiction, and human trafficking.

Human Services
9
Lutheran Social Services of Central Ohio Delaware Housing Inc

See schedule oto create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home…

10
Lutheran Services Florida Inc

Lutheran services florida brings god's healing, hope, and help to people in need in the name of jesus christ.

Human Services
11
Opportunities Inc of Jefferson County

Opportunities, inc. of jefferson county provides services for individuals for the purpose of maximizing their success and enhancing their abilities to be independent, contributing members of the community.

12
Lutheran Community Services Northwest

LCSNW partners with individuals, families and communities for health, justice and hope. LCSNW provides a wide variety of social services in Oregon, Washington and Idaho and serves people of all ages, cultures and faiths.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Opportunity International Inc D/B/a Opportunity International-Us and the most unlike its peers is All Among Us Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH — $1,043,968 · OtherTRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCHLUTHERAN SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY CHICAGO — $831,500 · OtherLUTHERAN SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY CHICAGOLUTHERAN SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY — $350,000 · OtherLUTHERAN SCHOOL OF THEOLOGYIndividual grant recipient — $175,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+26 more — $257,750 · Other+26 moreOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US — $10,000 · InternationalWINGS OF HOPE — $4,000 · InternationalCHILDREN OF GRACE — $1,500 · InternationalNURSES FOR NEWBORNS — $7,500 · Human ServicesGATEWAY HOMELESS SERVICES INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN SENIOR SERVICES — $500 · Human ServicesLutheran Elementary School Association — $250 · Education
Other$2,658,218International$15,500Human Services$9,000Education$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNURSES FOR NEWBORNS — $7,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWINGS OF HOPE — $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN OF GRACE — $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGATEWAY HOMELESS SERVICES INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALL AMONG US INC — $750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLUTHERAN SENIOR SERVICES — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLutheran Elementary School Association — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US
  • Who funds NURSES FOR NEWBORNS
  • Who funds WINGS OF HOPE
  • Who funds CHILDREN OF GRACE
  • Who funds GATEWAY HOMELESS SERVICES INC
  • Who funds ALL AMONG US INC
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SENIOR SERVICES
  • Who funds Lutheran Elementary School Association

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · St Louis Community Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Tietjen Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph