Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Thrive Birth to Five Foundation Dba Thrive Birth to Five

The thrive birth to five (tb5) foundation (the "foundation") has been the early childhood systems building organization in the richmond region since 2007 and was designated ready region central (rrc) by the virginia early childhood foundation and the virginia department of education in 2022.

$8.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $153k
  • $50k–250k20 grants · $2.9M
  • $250k+10 grants · $5.5M
$149,891
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YWCA RICHMOND$1,052,960
FOUNDATIONS LEARNING ACADEMY$883,609
SMART COOKIE LEARNING CENTER II$568,493
FRIENDS ASSOCIATION FOR CHILDREN$562,082
NEW DIRECTION CHILDCARE & LEARNING$531,266
ANGELS AT PLAY CHILDCARE CENTER$514,536
THE GREENHOUSE DAY CARE CENTER INC$485,177
OAK GROVE CHILD CARE CENTER$386,531
SOWING SEEDS ACADEMY$279,798
SKIPWITH ACADEMY AT COLONIAL$258,965
LET'S BE A KID CHILDCARE CENTER$209,086
YMCA OF GREATER RICHMOND$204,947
KIDZ WITH GOALS UNLIMITED LLC$196,759
Individual grant recipient$182,077
Individual grant recipient$177,791
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%YMCA OF GREATER RICHMOND: $205k → 22%YWCA RICHMOND: $1.1M → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field
03the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
2/6
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FOUNDATIONS LEARNING ACADEMY — $883,609 · OtherFOUNDATIONS LEARNING ACADEMYSMART COOKIE LEARNING CENTER II — $568,493 · OtherSMART COOKIE LEARNING CENTER IINEW DIRECTION CHILDCARE & LEARNING — $531,266 · OtherNEW DIRECTION CHILDCARE & LEARNINGANGELS AT PLAY CHILDCARE CENTER — $514,536 · OtherANGELS AT PLAY CHILDCARE CENTERTHE GREENHOUSE DAY CARE CENTER INC — $485,177 · OtherTHE GREENHOUSE DAY CARE CENTER INCOAK GROVE CHILD CARE CENTER — $386,531 · OtherOAK GROVE CHILD CARE CENTERSOWING SEEDS ACADEMY — $279,798 · OtherSKIPWITH ACADEMY AT COLONIAL — $258,965 · Other+23 more — $2,807,236 · Other+23 moreYWCA RICHMOND — $1,052,960 · Human ServicesYWCA RICHMONDYoung Men's Christian Association of Greater Richmond (6769) — $204,947 · Human ServicesYoung Men's Chri…CANDID — $562,082 · PhilanthropyGREATER RICHMOND SCAN - STOP CHILD ABUSE NOW INC — $26,224 · Crime & Legal
Other$6,715,611Human Services$1,257,907Philanthropy$562,082Crime & Legal$26,224

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYWCA RICHMOND — $1,052,960 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetCANDID — $562,082 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCHILDSAVERS- MEMORIAL CHILD GUIDANCE CLINIC — $98,700 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetGREATER RICHMOND SCAN - STOP CHILD ABUSE NOW INC — $26,224 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YWCA RICHMOND
  • Who funds CANDID
  • Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Richmond (6769)
  • Who funds CHILDSAVERS- MEMORIAL CHILD GUIDANCE CLINIC
  • Who funds GREATER RICHMOND SCAN - STOP CHILD ABUSE NOW INC
  • Who funds RESTORATION OUTREACH MINISTRIES

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bon Secours - St Mary's Hospital of Richmond IncVA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bon Secours - St Mary's Hospital of Richmond Inc · Bon Secours - Richmond Health System Inc · United Way of Greater Richmond & Petersburg · Shelton H Short Jr Trust · The Pauley Family Foundation · Virginia Nonprofit Housing Coalition · Richmond Memorial Health Foundation · Bon Secours Mercy Health Inc · The Community Foundation Inc · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Thrive Birth to Five Foundation Dba Thrive Birth to Five funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph