Skip to content

· Private foundation

Thomas S and Mary K Bagley Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$403k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$1.7MHealth$248kPublic Safety & Disaster$241kEducation$74kHuman Services$60kRecreation & Sports$28kAnimals$18kInternational$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION$250,000
NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION$50,000
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA COLORADO$20,000
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA COLORADO$15,000
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA COLORADO$15,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$10,000
CHERRY HILLS PALMER SCHOLARSHIP INC$10,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$5,000
COLORADO VETERANS SUPPORT INC$5,000
ARNOLD & WINNIE PALMER FOUNDATION$4,000
NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION$3,662
ACCESS OPPORTUNITY$3,000
LA THEATER WORKS$2,500
UNIVERSITY OF COLODADO DENVER$2,500
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND USA$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ACCESS OPPORTUNITY: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 10 repeat orgs$139k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
13

Total granted

$2.3M
$122k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+14%

Still filing today

60%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyEducationHealthAnimalsPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +17%
  • RI
    Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
    4× · 2017–2020 · $243k · revenue +31%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $30k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • CO
    COLORADO OPEN GOLF FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +12%
  • DENVER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTSgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +34%
  • VO
    VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA INC
    one grant, 2022 · $21k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
United States Golf Association

The united states golf association champions and advances the game of golf. it serves millions of golfers and thousands of golf courses both within the united states and around the world through programs and services that promote a…

Recreation & Sports
3
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
4
The Adler Planetarium

The adler planetarium ('adler') is a not-for-profit cultural institution whose mission is to connect people to the universe and each other under the sky we all share. it aspires to be the world's premier center for engaging in astronomy…

Arts & Culture
5
Doheny Eye Institute

To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).

—
6
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

—
7
Air Transport Association of America Inc

Airlines for america (a4a) vigorously advocates for america's airlines as models of safety, customer service, and environmental responsibility; and as the indispensable network that drives our nation's economy and global…

—
8
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
9
Alliance for Sustainable Energy Llc

The mission of the alliance for sustainable energy llc (alliance) is to operate the u.s. department of energy's national renewable energy laboratory to advance the science and engineering of energy efficiency, sustainable transportation,…

Science & Tech
10
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
11
Charles Stark Draper Laboratory Inc

Draper's engineers design, develop and deploy advanced technology solutions for the world's most difficult and important problems.

Science & Tech
12
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Center for the Performing Arts; the most unlike its peers is Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $1,670,322 · Arts & CultureNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC+2 more: $29,719 · Arts & CultureVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA COLORADO: $269,800 · OtherVOLUNTEERS OF AME…CHERRY HILLS PALMER SCHOLARSHIP INC: $27,500 · OtherCHERRY HILLS PALM…VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA INC: $20,700 · OtherVOLUNTEERS OF AME…L A THEATRE WORKS: $15,000 · Other+10 more: $46,000 · Other+10 moreRehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $243,480 · HealthRehabilitat…+1 more: $5,000 · HealthSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EducationJUST ONE INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,400 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationCOLORADO OPEN GOLF FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyCHICAGO LIGHTS: $5,000 · PhilanthropyARNOLD & WINNIE PALMER FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · PhilanthropyDENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $15,000 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals Inc: $2,500 · AnimalsCOLORADO VETERANS SUPPORT INC: $10,000 · Public Benefit
Arts & Culture$1,700,041Other$379,000Health$248,480Education$36,400Philanthropy$34,000Animals$17,500Public Benefit$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $1,670,322 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetRehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $243,480 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO OPEN GOLF FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetDENVER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetL A THEATRE WORKS: $15,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCOLORADO VETERANS SUPPORT INC: $10,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetJUST ONE INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,400 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND-USA INC: $5,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO LIGHTS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDENVER ART MUSEUM: $4,719 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARNOLD & WINNIE PALMER FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetACCESS OPPORTUNITY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST ELIZABETH'S SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Janus Henderson FoundationCO13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Janus Henderson Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thomas S and Mary K Bagley Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thomas S and Mary K Bagley Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Thomas S and Mary K Bagley Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Thomas S and Mary K Bagley Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Thomas S and Mary K Bagley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph