Skip to content

· Private foundation

Thomas Ohana Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$673k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$3.1MEducation$957kYouth Development$595kHuman Services$473kHousing & Shelter$427kHealth$237kFood & Nutrition$55kArts & Culture$25k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $188k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $185k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$37,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GLOBAL VOLUNTEERS$300,000
SCRIPPS HEALTH FOUNDATION$75,000
A STEP BEYOND$60,000
MONARCH SCHOOL$50,000
DOORS OF CHANGE$37,500
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$37,500
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SAN DIEGO$37,500
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$25,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$25,000
MAKI INTERNATIONAL$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $135k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $25k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $25k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $25k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $25k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $25k → 14%SOCIAL ADVOCATES FOR YOUTH SAN DIEGO: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
NJ
CA
UT
VA
NC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.7M · 14 repeat orgs$233k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +53% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
8

Total granted

$5.7M
$233k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+53%

Still filing today

86%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GV
    GLOBAL VOLUNTEERS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.7M · revenue +37%
  • AS
    A Step Beyond
    9× · 2017–2025 · $585k · revenue +67%
  • MS
    MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT
    8× · 2018–2025 · $480k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • EC
    EVA CARLSON ACADEMY FBO STEPHANIE R
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • WT
    WESTSIDE TREATMENT FBO SHIRA MILLER
    one grant, 2017 · $73k
  • TH
    THE HEIGHTS TREATMENT FBO SHIRA MIL
    one grant, 2017 · $28k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
2
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
3
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
4
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
5
United Way of San Diego County

To spark breakthrough community action that elevates every child and family toward a brighter future.

Philanthropy
6
Mount Sinai Health System Inc

The mission of the mount sinai health system is to provide compassionate patient care with seamless coordination and to advance medicine through unrivaled education, research, and outreach in the many diverse communities we serve.

Human Services
7
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
8
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
9
Emanate Health

Our mission is to help people keep well in body, mind, and spirit by providing quality health care services in a safe, compassionate environment.

Health
10
Kqed Inc

See schedule okqed serves the people of northern california with a community-supported alternative to commercial media, providing the knowledge needed to make informed decisions; convening community dialogue; bringing the arts to everyone;…

Arts & Culture
11
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
12
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jacobs & Cushman San Diego Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is Maki International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
13/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GLOBAL VOLUNTEERS: $2,682,962 · InternationalGLOBAL VOLUNTEERSMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $375,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SAN DIEGO INC: $267,500 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD …WATERFALL CANYON ACADEMY FBO ELLIOT: $133,058 · OtherWATERFALL CANYON…EVA CARLSON ACADEMY FBO STEPHANIE R: $99,761 · OtherEVA CARLSON ACAD…Individual grant recipient: $80,000 · OtherIndividual grant…WESTSIDE TREATMENT FBO SHIRA MILLER: $72,512 · OtherWESTSIDE TREATME…THE HEIGHTS TREATMENT FBO SHIRA MIL: $28,121 · OtherMaki International: $80,500 · OtherMaki Internation…JACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $50,000 · OtherJACOBS & CUSHMAN…+4 more: $23,096 · OtherA Step Beyond: $585,000 · Arts & CultureA Step Beyo…TALKING EYES MEDIA INC: $25,096 · Arts & CultureMONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT: $480,000 · EducationMONARCH SCH…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $125,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SIL…Doors of Change: $426,500 · Housing & ShelterSCRIPPS HEALTH: $236,650 · HealthWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $125,000 · Human ServicesSOCIAL ADVOCATES FOR YOUTH SAN DIEGO INC: $10,000 · Human Services
International$3,057,962Other$834,548Arts & Culture$610,096Education$605,000Housing & Shelter$426,500Health$236,650Human Services$135,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGLOBAL VOLUNTEERS: $2,682,962 over 9y, 23% of budgetA Step Beyond: $585,000 over 9y, 10% of budgetMONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT: $480,000 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetDoors of Change: $426,500 over 9y, 24% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $375,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SAN DIEGO INC: $267,500 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetSCRIPPS HEALTH: $236,650 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMaki International: $80,500 over 9y, 26% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTALKING EYES MEDIA INC: $25,096 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetSOCIAL ADVOCATES FOR YOUTH SAN DIEGO INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GLOBAL VOLUNTEERS ↗
  • Who funds A Step Beyond ↗
  • Who funds MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Doors of Change ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SAN DIEGO INC ↗
  • Who funds SCRIPPS HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Maki International ↗
  • Who funds JACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds TALKING EYES MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL ADVOCATES FOR YOUTH SAN DIEGO INC ↗
  • Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Country FriendsCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Country Friends · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thomas Ohana Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thomas Ohana Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Thomas Ohana’s filings →

More from the funding graph