Skip to content

· Private foundation

Thomas Martin Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$39k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$293kEducation$142kHealth$14kReligion$14kMembership Benefit$10kCrime & Legal$6kCommunity Improvement$6kHuman Services$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$1,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$455k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS$25,000
NELSON ATKINS MUSEUM$3,500
VILLAGE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$2,500
UMKC CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC$1,750
KAUFFMAN CTR FOR PERF ARTS$1,500
KANSAS CITY SYMPHONY$1,500
TRUMAN LIBRARY$1,000
KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FDN$1,000
UNIVERSITY ACADEMY$500
HARVEST WINE & FOOD FEST$500
ABILITYKCORG$500
GIFT OF LIFE$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 2% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE MISSION PROJECT: $250 → 5%FAMILY CONSERVANCY: $100 → 16%SAFEHOME INC: $5k → 5%ERIC'S CAMP FUND: $50 → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
OH
NE
MO
VA
KS
AR
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$476k · 21 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +93% since the first grant, against +43% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
27

Total granted

$476k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+93%
+43%

Still filing today

38%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureHousing & ShelterMembership BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TK
    The Kansas University Endowment Association
    2× · 2017–2018 · $20k · revenue +93%
  • DC
    DESTIN CHARITY WINE AUCTION FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $10k · revenue +2%
  • UA
    UNIVERSITY ACADEMY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $3k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • DF
    DESTIN FL WINE AUCTION FDN
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • SI
    SAFEHOME INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +49%
  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Kansas University Alumni Association

We build lifelong relationships that strengthen the university of kansas and the legacy of excellence embodied by its students, alumni, faculty, staff and friends.

Education
2
The Ku Endowment Charitable Gift Fund

To strengthen the University and communities that have touched the lives of KU alumni and friends, the mission of The KU Endowment Charitable Gift Fund is to receive and administer gifts and bequests to further the charitable objectives of…

Philanthropy
3
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
4
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
5
Kansas City Art Institute

The mission of KCAI is to educate artists and designers while honoring the distinct journeys of students. We forge a vibrant community that equips them to become leaders who leverage the creative process to transform the future.

Education
6
Kansas Children's Service League Foundation

To protect and promote the well-being of children by providing ongoing support of the charitable mission of the kansas children's service league.

Philanthropy
7
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
8
Kansas Academy of Family Physicians

The mission of the kansas academy of family physicians is to empower and cultivate kansas family physicians to: serve as trusted and innovative leaders champion a diverse, sustainable and inclusive workforce advocate and collaborate for…

—
9
Kansas Wesleyan University

Kansas wesleyan university is a liberal arts college that promotes and integrates academic excellence, spiritual development, personal well-being, and social responsibility.

Education
10
The Kidney Cancer Association

The kidney cancer association is a global community dedicated to serving and empowering patients, and leading change through advocacy, research, and education in order to be the universal leader in finding the cure for kidney cancer.

Health
11
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
12
University of Kansas Memorial Corporation

The memorial unions function as a concessionaire to the university of kansas for the purpose of operating various enterprises within the kansas union building, the burge union, the debruce center, residential dining halls, and other…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Family Conservancy; the most unlike its peers is Golf Foundation of Kansas City. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
17/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS: $226,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESSTRUMAN LIBRARY: $68,875 · OtherTRUMAN LIBRARYNELSON ATKINS MUSEUM: $28,000 · OtherNELSON ATKINS MUSEUMUMKC CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $17,175 · Other+29 more: $86,750 · Other+29 moreKAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FOUNDATION: $32,000 · EducationKAPPA KAPPA …The Kansas University Endowment Association: $20,000 · EducationThe Kansas U…UNIVERSITY ACADEMY: $2,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY ACADEMY FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Education+2 more: $1,000 · EducationDESTIN CHARITY WINE AUCTION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Membership BenefitSAFEHOME INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE MISSION PROJECT INC: $250 · Human Services+2 more: $150 · Human ServicesKAUFFMAN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $2,500 · Arts & CultureKANSAS CITY SYMPHONY: $1,500 · Arts & CultureARTS COUNCIL OF JOHNSON COUNTY: $500 · Arts & CultureAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $1,200 · HealthThe Children's Mercy Hospital: $1,050 · HealthGIFT OF LIFE INC: $100 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $100 · HealthCOMMUNITY LIVING OPPORTUNITIES INC: $100 · Housing & Shelter
Other$426,800Education$57,500Membership Benefit$10,000Human Services$5,400Arts & Culture$4,500Health$2,450Housing & Shelter$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FOUNDATION: $32,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetThe Kansas University Endowment Association: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDESTIN CHARITY WINE AUCTION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSAFEHOME INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY ACADEMY: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKAUFFMAN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY ACADEMY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetKANSAS CITY SYMPHONY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $1,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Children's Mercy Hospital: $1,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTS COUNCIL OF JOHNSON COUNTY: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRAWHIDE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOLF FOUNDATION OF KANSAS CITY: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPARK UNIVERSITY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetABILITY KC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS MN MINNESOTANORTH DAKOTASOUTH DAKOTA: $300 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetTHE MISSION PROJECT INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGIFT OF LIFE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY LIVING OPPORTUNITIES INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FAMILY CONSERVANCY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetERICS CAMP FUNDErics Camp Fund: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDSTLC INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTUHR MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Kansas University Endowment Association ↗
  • Who funds DESTIN CHARITY WINE AUCTION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFEHOME INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds KAUFFMAN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY ACADEMY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS CITY SYMPHONY ↗
  • Who funds AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN ↗
  • Who funds The Children's Mercy Hospital ↗
  • Who funds ARTS COUNCIL OF JOHNSON COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds RAWHIDE INC ↗
  • Who funds GOLF FOUNDATION OF KANSAS CITY ↗
  • Who funds PARK UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ABILITY KC ↗
  • Who funds AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS MN MINNESOTANORTH DAKOTASOUTH DAKOTA ↗
  • Who funds THE MISSION PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO31.3× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · The Francis Family Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Kansas City · John J Sullivan Jr Foundation John Houlehan & Mark Henke-Trustees · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · The Sunderland Foundation · Kelly Family Foundation · Muriel McBrien Kauffman Family Foundation · Buttonwood Foundation Charitable Tr · Greater Horizons · Hartley Family Foundation · The Atterbury Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thomas Martin Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thomas Martin Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Thomas Martin’s filings →

    More from the funding graph