Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Thomas Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Food & Nutrition$1.7MEnvironment$936kEducation$696kHuman Services$294kAnimals$280kInternational$270kArts & Culture$250kHealth$170kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $255k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $860k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$50,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$8.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Feeding America$250,000
PLANT FOR THE PLANET FOUNDATION$210,000
LEAF$110,000
Gettysburg Foundation$100,000
Trees for the future$100,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BOARDERS$100,000
Sustainable Harvest International$90,000
Our City Forest$50,000
Better Together Animal Alliance$50,000
Ameri Cares$50,000
Child Care Action Council$40,000
Family Education and Support Services$40,000
Angels On Stage$35,000
American Forests$35,000
Sandpoint Senior and DayBreak Centers$30,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $264k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FAMILY EDUCATION AND SUPPORT SERVICE: $40k → 9%Family Education and Support Services: $40k → 9%Family Education and Support Services: $40k → 9%FAMILY EDUCATION & SUPPORT SERVICE WA: $29k → 9%Child Care Action Council: $40k → 9%Family Education and Support Services: $15k → 9%CHILD CARE ACTION COUNCIL: $40k → 9%CHILD CARE ACTION COUNCIL OF THURSTON COUNTY: $20k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
ID
IL
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
MD
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.5M · 28 repeat orgs$408k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
9

Total granted

$4.5M
$158k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+66%

Still filing today

68%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEnvironmentHealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Feeding America
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +40%
  • FO
    Friends of the Shelter Inc dba Better Together Animal Alliance
    8× · 2017–2024 · $280k · revenue +91%
  • SH
    Sustainable Harvest International
    7× · 2017–2024 · $235k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • GS
    GEORGE SPANGLER FARM PROJECT
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $40k · revenue +21%
  • TE
    TRI-CITY ECOLOGY CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fsc I&P

Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…

Philanthropy
2
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
3
Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research

Foundation for food and agriculture research connects funders, researchers and farmers through public-private partnerships to support audacious research addressing the biggest food and agriculture challenges.

Food & Nutrition
4
Global Forest Generation

Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…

Environment
5
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
6
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
7
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
8
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
9
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
10
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
11
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
12
Foodshot Global Inc

Accelerate the transformation to a healthy, sustainable and equitable food system.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is Angels On Stage. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFood Pantries & AssistanceEarly Childhood Education C…Christian Missionary Organi…Community Arts OrganizationsLand Conservation Organizat…Senior Support ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…Cancer Support OrganizationsChild and Family ServicesLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Animal Rescue and Adoption
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr13%38%35–55yr16%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%5%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%62%35–55yr16%8%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,537

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
20/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PLANT FOR THE PLANET FOUNDATION — $323,030 · OtherPLANT FOR THE PLANET FOUNDATIONLAKE PEND OREILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT — $165,000 · OtherLAKE PEND OREILLE SCHOOL DISTRICTHABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $130,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYPlantForThePlanetorg — $125,530 · OtherPlantForThePlanetorgYELM SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 2 — $113,000 · OtherYELM SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 2LEAF — $110,000 · OtherLEAFANGELS ON STAGE — $100,000 · OtherANGELS ON STAGETHE ZACHARY & ELIZABETH M FISHER CENTER FOR ALZHEIMER'S RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $70,000 · OtherALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $70,000 · OtherGETTYSBURG FOUNDATION — $150,000 · OtherGETTYSBURG FOUNDATION+17 more — $422,500 · Other+17 moreFeeding America — $1,305,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding AmericaSustainable Harvest International — $235,000 · EnvironmentSustainable Ha…OUR CITY FOREST — $135,000 · EnvironmentOUR CITY FORES…TREES FOR THE FUTURE INC — $130,000 · EnvironmentTREES FOR THE …NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $90,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOUR…American Forests — $35,000 · EnvironmentAmerican Fores…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $210,000 · InternationalMEDECINS …FEED THE CHILDREN INC — $105,000 · InternationalFEED THE …AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · InternationalAMERICARE…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $40,000 · InternationalWORLD CEN…+1 more — $10,000 · InternationalFriends of the Shelter Inc dba Better Together Animal Alliance — $280,000 · AnimalsFAMILY EDUCATION & SUPPORT SERVICES — $164,000 · Human ServicesCHILD CARE ACTION COUNCIL OF THURSTON COUNTY — $100,000 · Human ServicesKHAN ACADEMY INC — $200,000 · Education
Other$1,779,060Food & Nutrition$1,305,000Environment$625,000International$415,000Animals$280,000Human Services$264,000Education$200,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFeeding America — $1,305,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of the Shelter Inc dba Better Together Animal Alliance — $280,000 over 8y, 4.6% of budgetSustainable Harvest International — $235,000 over 7y, 7.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $210,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKHAN ACADEMY INC — $200,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY EDUCATION & SUPPORT SERVICES — $164,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetGETTYSBURG FOUNDATION — $150,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetOUR CITY FOREST — $135,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetTREES FOR THE FUTURE INC — $130,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC — $105,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD CARE ACTION COUNCIL OF THURSTON COUNTY — $100,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetANGELS ON STAGE — $100,000 over 7y, 41% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $90,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ZACHARY & ELIZABETH M FISHER CENTER FOR ALZHEIMER'S RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $70,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $70,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSandpoint Area Seniors Inc — $48,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Forests — $35,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUSAGAINSTALZHEIMER'S — $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMercy Ships International — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIDAHO PANHANDLE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 14% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Feeding America
  • Who funds Friends of the Shelter Inc dba Better Together Animal Alliance
  • Who funds Sustainable Harvest International
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds KHAN ACADEMY INC
  • Who funds FAMILY EDUCATION & SUPPORT SERVICES
  • Who funds GETTYSBURG FOUNDATION
  • Who funds OUR CITY FOREST
  • Who funds TREES FOR THE FUTURE INC
  • Who funds FEED THE CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds CHILD CARE ACTION COUNCIL OF THURSTON COUNTY
  • Who funds ANGELS ON STAGE
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds THE ZACHARY & ELIZABETH M FISHER CENTER FOR ALZHEIMER'S RESEARCH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Sandpoint Area Seniors Inc
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds American Forests
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds USAGAINSTALZHEIMER'S
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International
  • Who funds IDAHO PANHANDLE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Thurston CountyWA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Thurston County · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Thomas Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Feed the Children Inc1% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph