Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Thomas D and Patsy K Hosman Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$78k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222025.

Religion$101kYouth Development$27kPhilanthropy$22kHousing & Shelter$22kHuman Services$17kHealth$10kEducation$7kInternational$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $58k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $21k
$2,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$490k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$20,600
HOMELESS ALLIANCE$9,000
HOPE FOR THE FUTURE$8,000
CAMP NAKANAWA$7,000
ALLEGRO SOLUTIONS - NCC$5,000
MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION$5,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY$3,000
THE URBAN MISSION$3,000
ISLAND FELLOWSHIP CHURCH$3,000
CITY RESCUE MISSION$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
GOODLAND ACADEMY$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA$1,000
INFANT CRISIS CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 12%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $1k → 12%HOPE FOR THE FUTURE: $8k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of Thomas D and Patsy K Hosman Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Thomas D and Patsy K Hosman Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$180k · 16 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
2

Total granted

$180k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+16%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentEducationCivil RightsRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $17k · revenue +52%
  • THE URBAN MISSION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $6k · revenue +7%
  • DD
    DELTA DELTA DELTA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $2k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • AS
    ASTEC SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $550
  • IH
    INTEGRIS Health Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $500 · revenue +16%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oklahoma City Family Justice Center Inc

The mission of the okcfjc is to provide protection, hope and healing to those impacted by domestic and family violence in the oklahoma city community. the organization provides a centrally located facility which co-locates and coordinates…

Crime & Legal
2
Shelterwell Inc

Shelterwell fosters a spirit of connected community, centered on the belief that housing is a human right.

Housing & Shelter
3
La Luz Organization Inc

La Luz Organization helps the underserved Latino population in Oklahoma with culturally and faith based trauma-informed services to victims of domestic violence,sexual assault and stalking.

Human Services
4
The Center for Economic Opportunity and Belonging

Our mission is to engage with communities and catalyze private, public, and philanthropic partnerships to remedy opportunity gaps in economic opportunity, education, health, and housing in Utah.

Community Improvement
5
Young Womens Christian Association of Oklahoma Ci

Ywca oklahoma city is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all

Human Services
6
Child Advocacy Center of Central Ok Inc

The purpose of the organization is to provide hope-centered, trauma-informed, child-first services that unite law enforcement, child protective services (state and tribal), prosecutors, mental health professionals, and medical…

Human Services
7
Foundation for the Homeless Inc

Empowering families and individuals experiencing homelessness to build a future filled with dignity, opportunity, and lasting solutions.

8
The Center for Women and Children in Crisis

Provide a caring, advocating, safe, and educationally based environment for survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault.

Health
9
The City Lights Foundation of Oklahoma

Our mission is rooted in the belief that meaningful relationships restore communities. through relational service and dignified housing solutions, we work to help people move from surviving to thriving.

Human Services
10
Transitional Living Centers of Oklahoma Inc

Assist in preparing homeless and near homeless women in the skills to care for their children and enable them to move toward self-sufficiency.

Housing & Shelter
11
Community of Hope

Community of hope's mission is to improve health, end homelessness, and partner with communities to make washington, dc more equitable.

Community Improvement
12
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Utah

Big brothers big sisters of utah's vision is that all children achieve success in life. our mission is to create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation of Greater Chattanooga Inc and the most unlike its peers is Camp Nakanawa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $92,100 · OtherWESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHALLEGRO SOLUTIONS - NCC — $10,000 · OtherALLEGRO SOLUTIONS - NCCTHE URBAN MISSION INC — $6,200 · OtherMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Other+16 more — $29,222 · Other+16 moreCamp Nakanawa — $17,000 · Recreation & SportsCamp Naka…THE HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC — $17,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE HOMEL…Hope For The Future Inc — $8,000 · Human ServicesCITY RESCUE MISSION INC — $4,000 · Human ServicesThe Community Foundation of Greater Chattanooga Inc — $11,000 · PhilanthropyBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY INC — $9,500 · Youth DevelopmentDELTA DELTA DELTA FOUNDATION — $2,000 · Education
Other$142,522Recreation & Sports$17,000Housing & Shelter$17,000Human Services$12,000Philanthropy$11,000Youth Development$9,500Education$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC — $17,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe Community Foundation of Greater Chattanooga Inc — $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY INC — $9,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHope For The Future Inc — $8,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetCITY RESCUE MISSION INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Legacy Missions International — $3,672 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDELTA DELTA DELTA FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR BECOMING — $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTEGRIS Health Foundation Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Camp Nakanawa
  • Who funds THE HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC
  • Who funds The Community Foundation of Greater Chattanooga Inc
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY INC
  • Who funds Hope For The Future Inc
  • Who funds THE URBAN MISSION INC
  • Who funds CITY RESCUE MISSION INC
  • Who funds Family Legacy Missions International
  • Who funds DELTA DELTA DELTA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR BECOMING
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE
  • Who funds INTEGRIS Health Foundation Inc
  • Who funds DINNER WITH LOVE FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Fidelity FoundationOK17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Fidelity Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · David & Lezlie Hudiburg Family Fdn · Harris Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Thomas D and Patsy K Hosman Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Thomas D and Patsy K Hosman Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Thomas D and Patsy K Hosman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph