Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Thomas & Carolyn Langfitt Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$111k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$37k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 42% of THOMAS & CAROLYN LANGFITT FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $77k
$7,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Randolph Area Community Development$37,000
Episcopal Academy$10,000
NPR Foundation$10,000
Episcopal Community Services of the$10,000
St Christopher's Church$10,000
Chesapeake Bay Foundation INC$7,000
African Wildlife Foundation$5,000
Texas Public Radio$5,000
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation$5,000
Trustees of Boston University$5,000
Philadelphia Museum of Art$3,500
Philadelphia Museum of Art$3,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 87% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Trustees of Boston University: $5k → 16%St Christopher's Church: $10k → 7%Natural Lands Trust Incorporated: $20k → 10%Grant Foundation dba Hospital: $10k → 11%SEE SCHEDULE ATTACHED: $99k → 22%Junior State of AmericaFoundation: $5k → 10%South Wedge Mission: $10k → 14%First Look Institute: $15k → 17%Texas Public Radio: $5k → 16%African Wildlife Foundation: $5k → 14%University of Florida Foundation Inc: $5k → 19%Princeton University Class of 1986: $5k → 11%Randolph Area Community Development: $37k → 10%Chesapeake Bay Foundation INC: $7k → 6%Cystic Fibrosis Foundation: $5k → 8%St Christopher's Church: $10k → 7%Episcopal Academy: $10k → 10%Grant Foundation dba Hospital: $5k → 11%Episcopal Community Services of the: $10k → 22%St Joseph's Neighborhood Center: $10k → 14%Doctors Without Borders USA: $14k → 17%African Wildlife Foundation: $5k → 14%Cystic Fibrosis Foundation: $5k → 8%St Christopher's Church: $8k → 7%Episcopal Academy: $10k → 10%Episcopal Community Services of the: $10k → 22%St Joseph's Neighborhood Center: $10k → 14%King Baudouin Foundation United States: $5k → 17%African Wildlife Foundation: $5k → 14%Cystic Fibrosis Foundation: $5k → 8%St Christopher's Church: $5k → 7%Episcopal Academy: $10k → 10%Episcopal Community Services of the: $10k → 22%South Wedge Mission: $10k → 14%NPR Foundation: $10k → 14%Cystic Fibrosis Foundation: $5k → 8%Episcopal Academy: $10k → 10%NPR Foundation: $10k → 14%National Public Radio Inc: $10k → 14%First Look Institute: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
MD
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 13% of Thomas & Carolyn Langfitt Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Thomas & Carolyn Langfitt Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$364k · 14 repeat orgs$173k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
11

Total granted

$364k
$119k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+27%

Still filing today

64%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $54k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentHealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EA
    Episcopal Academy
    5× · 2019–2024 · $52k · revenue +32%
  • NF
    NPR FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +8%
  • AW
    AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $15k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • VL
    Vermont Long-Term Disaster
    one grant, 2023 · $34k
  • NL
    Natural Lands Trust Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +123%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $14k · revenue +1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

4
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

5
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
6
The Paris Review Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to foster the development of creative individuals as writers and artists and to promote public appreciation of excellence in the literary and graphic arts by publishing a magazine containing fiction,…

Education
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
Council On Foreign Relations Inc

The council on foreign relations (cfr) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and…

International
9
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
10
Public Media Nj Inc

To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse

Arts & Culture
11
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

12
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Trustees of Princeton University and the most unlike its peers is St Joseph's House of Hospitality. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Advocacy and …Childhood Cancer SupportChristian Outreach Ministri…Charter and Independent Sch…Government Accountability &…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Local History Museums
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 60 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr13%19%35–55yr16%57%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%59%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,540

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
16/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Vermont Long-Term Disaster — $34,000 · OtherVermont Long-Term DisasterST CHRISTOPHERS CHURCH — $33,000 · OtherST CHRISTOPHERS CHURCHEpiscopal Community Services of the — $30,000 · OtherEpiscopal Community Services of theSOUTH WEDGE MISSION — $27,000 · OtherSOUTH WEDGE MISSIONST JOSEPHS NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC — $25,250 · OtherST JOSEPHS NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INCSt Joseph's House of Hospitality — $20,000 · OtherSt Joseph's House of HospitalityNPR FOUNDATION — $20,000 · OtherNPR FOUNDATIONGrant Foundation dba Hospital — $15,000 · OtherGrant Foundation dba HospitalGrant Foundation dba Hopital Albert Schweitzer — $11,000 · OtherAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · OtherAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC+4 more — $20,250 · Other+4 morePHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART — $58,500 · Arts & CulturePHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF…First Look Institute Inc — $35,000 · Arts & CultureFirst Look Institute I…NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO …TEXAS PUBLIC RADIO — $5,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $1,000 · Arts & CultureEpiscopal Academy — $52,000 · EducationEpiscopal Academ…GOUCHER COLLEGE — $11,000 · EducationGOUCHER COLLEGEThe Trustees of Princeton University — $6,500 · EducationThe Trustees of …THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY O…LOS ANGELES REVIEW OF BOOKS — $3,000 · EducationRANDOLPH AREA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $37,000 · Community ImprovementNatural Lands Trust Inc — $20,000 · EnvironmentCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC — $7,000 · EnvironmentCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $21,000 · HealthMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $14,000 · InternationalMYRIAD USA INC — $5,000 · International
Other$250,500Arts & Culture$109,500Education$78,500Community Improvement$37,000Environment$27,000Health$21,000International$19,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART — $58,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEpiscopal Academy — $52,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRANDOLPH AREA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $37,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetFirst Look Institute Inc — $35,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $21,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSt Joseph's House of Hospitality — $20,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetNPR FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNatural Lands Trust Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $14,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOUCHER COLLEGE — $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC — $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University — $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEPILEPSY-PRALID INC — $5,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR STATE OF AMERICA — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTEXAS PUBLIC RADIO — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES REVIEW OF BOOKS — $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWHYY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA10× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Thomas & Carolyn Langfitt Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Randolph Area Community Development Corporation51% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University12% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University11% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph