Skip to content
Thomas C & Mary Ann Hays Fam Char Tr at a glance

· Private foundation

Thomas C & Mary Ann Hays Fam Char Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$413k
Granted FY2025still arriving
72
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$79k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$549kFood & Nutrition$232kAnimals$215kEnvironment$183kCivil Rights$182kArts & Culture$169kYouth Development$147kHousing & Shelter$127kOther$0
02FY2025 · 72 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k68 grants · $276k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $59k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $79k
$4,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$6.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DEVEREUX FOUNDATION$78,744
CHARLOTTESVILLE ALBEMARLE SPCA$38,000
LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES$11,000
BLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK$10,000
ALAMEDA EMERGENCY FOOD$9,000
SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK$9,000
SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION$9,000
LYRIC$8,500
BLUE RIDGE FOOD BANK$8,000
HOMELESS YOUTH ALLIANCE INC$7,000
CENTRAL CITY HOSPITALITY HOUSE$7,000
UFW FOUNDATION$7,000
OHIO WILDLIFE CENTER$6,000
ICFTPAINTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR THE -- P$6,000
ETHIOPIAN TEWAHEDO SOCIAL SERVICES$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $182k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BORDER ANGELS: $4k → 11%ETHIOPIAN TEWAHEDO SOCIAL SERVICES: $6k → 15%BORDER ANGELS: $4k → 11%ETHIOPIAN TEWAHEDO SOCIAL SERVICES: $5k → 15%BORDER ANGELS: $3k → 11%ETHIOPIAN TEWAHEDO SOCIAL SERVICES: $5k → 15%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $4k → 10%CENTRAL AMERICAN LEGAL ASSISTANCE: $1k → 20%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $3k → 10%CENTRAL AMERICAN LEGAL ASSISTANCE: $500 → 20%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $3k → 10%CENTRAL AMERICAN LEGAL ASSISTANCE: $500 → 20%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $2k → 10%CENTRAL AMERICAN LEGAL ASSISTANCE: $500 → 20%SHELTER FOR HELP IN EMERGANCY: $5k → 8%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $2k → 10%CENTRAL AMERICAN LEGAL ASSISTANCE: $500 → 20%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $2k → 10%CENTRAL AMERICAN LEGAL ASSISTANCE: $500 → 20%SHELTER FOR HELP IN EMERGENCY: $5k → 8%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $11k → 10%SHELTER FOR HELP IN EMERGENCY: $4k → 8%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $10k → 10%READYKIDS: $4k → 8%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $10k → 10%SHELTER FOR HELP IN EMERGENCY: $4k → 8%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $10k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $10k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $10k → 10%SHELTER FOR HELP IN EMERGENCY: $3k → 8%SHELTER FOR HELP IN EMERGENCY: $3k → 8%HAVEN AT FIRST & MARKET INC: $3k → 8%COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS: $4k → 10%NATIVE AMERICAN INDIAN CENTER OF CENT OH: $1k → 15%COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS: $4k → 10%READY KIDS: $2k → 8%COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS: $3k → 10%COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS: $3k → 10%ETHIOPIAN TEWAHEDO SOCIAL SERVICES: $6k → 15%ETHIOPIAN TEWAHEDO SOCIAL SERVICES: $5k → 15%ARC OF THE PIEDMONT: $3k → 8%CITY OF PROMISE: $2k → 8%CITY HOPE SAN FRANCISCO: $5k → 10%CITY OF PROMISE: $2k → 8%CITY OF PROMISE: $2k → 8%CITY OF PROMISE: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
OR
OH
PA
CA
CO
MO
VA
AZ
NC
DC
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 87 repeat orgs$245k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

87 repeat relationships: 60 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

87
50

Total granted

$1.9M
$216k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+1%

Still filing today

78%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEnvironmentArts & CultureHealthCivil RightsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AS
    ALBEMARLE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $140k · revenue +53%
  • LS
    Larkin Street Youth Services
    6× · 2020–2025 · $61k · revenue +7%
  • BR
    BLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $59k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF NORTH CAROLINA
    one grant, 2024 · $18k · revenue 0%
  • LY
    LAVENDER YOUTH RECREATION AND INFORMATIO
    one grant, 2022 · $17k
  • CY
    Cultura y Arte Nativa De Las Americas
    one grant, 2022 · $17k · revenue -72%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
2
Asian Law Caucus

The Asian Law Caucus's mission is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist…

Crime & Legal
3
American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California

The american civil liberties union of northern california (aclu nc union) defends and advances the principles of freedom, equality and justice contained in the united states constitution. aclu nc union, a california mutual benefit…

—
4
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
5
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
6
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
7
Inner City Law Center

In 2024, Inner City Law Center, ICLC, served over 3,400 people, helping vulnerable Angelenos to remain in their homes and recover nearly $20.5 million in financial benefits.

Crime & Legal
8
The Alliance for Collective Action

The Alliance for Collective Action convenes leaders of environmental and social movements to advance solutions for a thriving planet. We advance our mission through the Alliance Center building and community, as well as through Collective…

Environment
9
Family Violence Law Center

FVLC helps diverse communities in Alameda County heal from domestic violence and sexual assault, advocating for justice and healthy relationships. We provide survivor-centered legal and crisis intervention services, offer prevention for…

Crime & Legal
10
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
11
Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area

As one of the most enduring civil rights institutions on the West Coast, we work to dismantle systems of oppression and racism, and build an equitable and just society.

—
12
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Initiatives; the most unlike its peers is National Coalition of 100 Black Women. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

98 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 98 of the 150 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
96/98
Grantees still filing
59/98
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC: $59,000 · OtherBLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INCSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $49,000 · OtherUFW FOUNDATION: $33,000 · OtherFOOTHILLS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $36,600 · OtherHomeless Youth Alliance: $37,000 · Other+101 more: $728,679 · Other+101 moreThe Devereux Foundation: $419,321 · HealthThe Devereux FoundationTHE WOMEN'S INITIATIVE: $22,000 · HealthCHARLOTTESVILLE FREE CLINIC: $19,500 · Health+3 more: $22,500 · HealthLarkin Street Youth Services: $61,000 · Human ServicesLarkin Str…ETHIOPIAN TEWAHEDO SOCIAL SERVICES: $27,000 · Human ServicesETHIOPIAN …BORDER ANGELS: $26,000 · Human ServicesBORDER ANG…SHELTER FOR HELP IN EMERGENCY INC: $24,000 · Human ServicesSHELTER FO…HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $16,000 · Human ServicesHUCKLEBERR…Coalition On Homelessness: $14,000 · Human ServicesCoalition …CITY OF PROMISE INC: $8,000 · Human Services+6 more: $20,500 · Human Services+6 moreNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $37,500 · EnvironmentNATURAL R…THE OHIO ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $31,000 · EnvironmentTHE OHIO …SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $31,000 · EnvironmentSIERRA CL…GREENPEACE FUND INC: $26,000 · EnvironmentGREENPEAC…NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $22,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL …San Francisco Bicycle Coalition: $16,000 · EnvironmentSan Franc…FRIENDS OF THE URBAN FOREST: $7,100 · Environment+2 more: $7,500 · EnvironmentALBEMARLE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS INC: $139,500 · AnimalsALBEMARLE…OHIO WILDLIFE CENTER: $31,000 · AnimalsOHIO WILD…INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR THE PRESERVATION OF WILD ANIMALS INC: $6,000 · Animals+1 more: $1,000 · AnimalsTHE COLUMBUS HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $22,000 · Arts & CultureOHIO HISTORY CONNECTION: $18,000 · Arts & CultureCultura y Arte Nativa De Las Americas: $17,000 · Arts & CultureROY G BIV EMERGING ARTISTS INC: $13,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF CERAMICS FOUNDATION: $12,000 · Arts & CultureCOLUMBUS MUSEUM OF ART: $10,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY ARTS PROJECT INC: $4,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $5,000 · Arts & CultureAlameda Emergency Food DBA Alameda Food Bank: $49,000 · Food & NutritionLOAVES & FISHES FOOD PANTRY INC: $23,000 · Food & NutritionEMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK: $11,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$943,279Health$483,321Human Services$196,500Environment$178,100Animals$177,500Arts & Culture$101,000Food & Nutrition$83,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Devereux Foundation: $419,321 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetALBEMARLE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS INC: $139,500 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetLarkin Street Youth Services: $61,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC: $59,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $49,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAlameda Emergency Food DBA Alameda Food Bank: $49,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $37,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHomeless Youth Alliance: $37,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetFOOTHILLS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $36,600 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetUFW FOUNDATION: $33,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OHIO ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $31,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetOHIO WILDLIFE CENTER: $31,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $31,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCentral City Hospitality House: $31,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLAVENDER YOUTH RECREATION & INFORMATION CENTER INC LYRIC: $30,400 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $28,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetETHIOPIAN TEWAHEDO SOCIAL SERVICES: $27,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGREENPEACE FUND INC: $26,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBORDER ANGELS: $26,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetSHELTER FOR HELP IN EMERGENCY INC: $24,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetLOAVES & FISHES FOOD PANTRY INC: $23,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC: $22,850 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $22,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S INITIATIVE: $22,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE COLUMBUS HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $22,000 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OHIO INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCHARLOTTESVILLE FREE CLINIC: $19,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS-OH: $19,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetPIEDMONT HOUSING ALLIANCE: $18,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTH CAROLINA: $18,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOHIO HISTORY CONNECTION: $18,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCultura y Arte Nativa De Las Americas: $17,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAVE MOUNT DIABLO: $16,700 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSan Francisco Bicycle Coalition: $16,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetHUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $16,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSEXUAL ASSAULT RESOURCE AGENCY: $14,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCoalition On Homelessness: $14,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetPIEDMONT CASA INC: $14,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetROY G BIV EMERGING ARTISTS INC: $13,000 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA: $12,600 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBay Area Community Law Foundation: $12,400 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF CHARLOTTESVILLE- ALBEMARLE: $12,250 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetST JAMES INFIRMARY: $12,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMUSEUM OF CERAMICS FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetInternational Neighbors Inc: $12,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $11,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK: $11,500 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetMONTICELLO AREA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $11,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Devereux Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ALBEMARLE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS INC ↗
  • Who funds Larkin Street Youth Services ↗
  • Who funds BLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Alameda Emergency Food DBA Alameda Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds Homeless Youth Alliance ↗
  • Who funds FOOTHILLS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UFW FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE OHIO ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds OHIO WILDLIFE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Central City Hospitality House ↗
  • Who funds LAVENDER YOUTH RECREATION & INFORMATION CENTER INC LYRIC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ETHIOPIAN TEWAHEDO SOCIAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds GREENPEACE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds BORDER ANGELS ↗
  • Who funds SHELTER FOR HELP IN EMERGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds LOAVES & FISHES FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WOMEN'S INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds THE COLUMBUS HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OHIO INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARLOTTESVILLE FREE CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS-OH ↗
  • Who funds PIEDMONT HOUSING ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTH CAROLINA ↗
  • Who funds OHIO HISTORY CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds Cultura y Arte Nativa De Las Americas ↗
  • Who funds SAVE MOUNT DIABLO ↗
  • Who funds San Francisco Bicycle Coalition ↗
  • Who funds HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds SEXUAL ASSAULT RESOURCE AGENCY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charlottesville Area …The Genan FoundationCaplin FoundationManning Family Founda…Perry Foundation IncUnited Way of Greater…The Charles Fund IncThe Oak Hill FundS&P Global Foundation…Oakwood Foundation Ch…The J & E Berkley Fou…Sentara Health
Charlottesville Area Community FoundationVA54.1× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charlottesville Area Community Foundation · The Genan Foundation · Caplin Foundation · Manning Family Foundation · Perry Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Charlottesville · The Charles Fund Inc · The Oak Hill Fund · S&P Global Foundation Fka the McGraw-Hill Research Foundation · Oakwood Foundation Charitable Trust · The J & E Berkley Foundation · Sentara Health

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thomas C & Mary Ann Hays Fam Char Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thomas C & Mary Ann Hays Fam Char Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    46report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 150 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Thomas C & Mary Ann Hays Fam Char Tr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home