Skip to content

· Private foundation

Thomas B Dixson Et Al

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$150k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$1.0MHealth$182kReligion$153kPhilanthropy$61k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$6,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EMORY UNIVERSITY$75,000
REFORMED THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY FBO ZION$7,000
ASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY FBO SAMUEL$7,000
ASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY FBO HENRY$7,000
SAMFORD UNIVERSITY$6,500
SAMFORD UNIVERSITY$6,500
ASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY FBO HANNAH$6,000
MIDWESTERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEM$5,000
REFORMED THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY FBO$5,000
WHEATON COLLEGE FBO MARY STOCKERBRAND$5,000
SOUTHERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEM FBO$5,000
GORDON CONWELL THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY$5,000
FULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY FBO BETHANY$5,000
REFORMED THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY FBO$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%GORDON CONWELL THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $5k → 10%WHEATON COLLEGE FBO MARY STOCKERBRAND: $5k → 11%FULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $5k → 14%SAMFORD UNIVERSITY: $7k → 16%MIDWESTERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEM: $5k → 8%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $82k → 14%BERRY COLLEGE: $1k → 15%REFORMED THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY FBO ZION: $7k → 23%DIXSON T B FAM MEM FUND-CROSSNORE: $61k → 13%ASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY FBO SAMUEL: $7k → 12%SOUTHERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEM FBO: $5k → 15%SAMFORD UNIVERSITY: $7k → 16%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $75k → 14%REFORMED THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY FBO: $5k → 23%ASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY FBO HENRY: $7k → 12%REFORMED THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY FBO: $5k → 23%ASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY FBO HANNAH: $6k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
NV
CA
MO
KY
VA
AZ
TN
NC
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 23 repeat orgs$341k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
55

Total granted

$1.1M
$308k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+33%

Still filing today

61%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EU
    Emory University
    4× · 2021–2025 · $279k · revenue +32%
  • Samford University
    5× · 2018–2025 · $62k · revenue +61%
  • AT
    ASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY
    5× · 2018–2024 · $61k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • DT
    DIXSON T B FAM MEM FUND-CROSSNORE
    one grant, 2023 · $61k · revenue -11% · 65% of their budget
  • LU
    LONGWOOD UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2019 · $14k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY
    one grant, 2019 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
2
University of the South

The College of Arts and Sciences is committed to the development of the whole person through a liberal arts education of the highest quality. The School of Theology educates women and men to serve the broad whole of the Episcopal Church in…

Education
3
Greensboro College

Greensboro College provides a liberal arts education grounded in the traditions of the United Methodist Church and fosters the intellectual, social, and spiritual development of all students while supporting their individual needs.

Education
4
Florida Southern College

Florida southern college (florida southern or the college) is committed to educational excellence and is a selective comprehensive, private, united methodist affiliated college with a strong liberal arts core and signature programs. (see…

Education
5
William Jessup University

In partnership with the church, the purpose of william jessup university is to educate transformational leaders for the glory of god.

—
6
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
7
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
8
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
9
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
10
LaGrange College

Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…

Education
11
Roberts Wesleyan University

As new york's leading university for character education, rwu is a community of learners committed to historic christianity which seeks to prepare thoughtful, spiritually mature, service-oriented people who will transform society.

Education
12
American Baptist Theological Seminary dba American Baptist College

Is to provide educational opportunities for gifted students who have limited academic experiences and resources but unlimited potential for leadership in society.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Samford University; the most unlike its peers is Dixson T B Fam Mem Fund-Crossnore. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
15/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Emory University: $278,690 · EducationEmory UniversitySamford University: $61,500 · EducationSamford UniversityASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $61,000 · EducationASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARYREFORMED THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $47,500 · EducationREFORMED THEOLOGICAL SEMINARYWARREN WILSON COLLEGE: $40,000 · EducationWARREN WILSON COLLEGERICHMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY: $39,000 · EducationRICHMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITYLEES-MCRAE COLLEGE INC: $27,000 · Education+7 more: $81,500 · Education+7 moreEMORY UNIVERSITY: $135,000 · OtherEMORY UNIVERSITYREFORMED THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $61,000 · OtherREFORMED THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY+66 more: $349,500 · Other+66 moreCROSSNORE COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDREN: $182,000 · HealthCROSSNORE COMM…DIXSON T B FAM MEM FUND-CROSSNORE: $61,283 · Philanthropy
Education$636,190Other$545,500Health$182,000Philanthropy$61,283

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEmory University: $278,690 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSNORE COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDREN: $182,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSamford University: $61,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDIXSON T B FAM MEM FUND-CROSSNORE: $61,283 over 1y, 65% of budgetASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $61,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetREFORMED THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $47,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWARREN WILSON COLLEGE: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRICHMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY: $39,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLEES-MCRAE COLLEGE INC: $27,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGordon-Conwell Theological Seminary Inc: $17,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY: $14,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDallas Theological Seminary: $13,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBERRY COLLEGE INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST ANDREWS UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds CROSSNORE COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Samford University ↗
  • Who funds DIXSON T B FAM MEM FUND-CROSSNORE ↗
  • Who funds ASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ↗
  • Who funds REFORMED THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ↗
  • Who funds WARREN WILSON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds RICHMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LEES-MCRAE COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds FULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ↗
  • Who funds Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Dallas Theological Seminary ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chattanooga Christian Community FoundationTN15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · Lilly Endowment Inc · Verizon Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thomas B Dixson Et Al funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thomas B Dixson Et Al. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 84 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Thomas B Dixson Et Al’s filings →

    More from the funding graph