· Private foundation
Thomas & Nephele Wing Domencich Fdn
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k23 grants · $38k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $34k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| USET FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| ROAD TO THE TOP INC | $14,000 |
| FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIF | $5,000 |
| CLEVELAND CLINIC | $3,000 |
| RIDGEBURY FARM | $2,500 |
| FRIENDS OF NEW BOLTON CENTER | $2,500 |
| KEVIN BABINGTON FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| BROOKE USA FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY | $2,000 |
| CARING FIELDS FELINES | $2,000 |
| MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING | $2,000 |
| MGH FUND | $2,000 |
| EVERGLADES FOUNDATION | $1,500 |
| WILD EARTH ALLIES | $1,500 |
| CHRIST MEMORIAL CHAPEL | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 63% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
73 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2025, 49 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC8× · 2017–2025 · $23k · revenue +226%- RTROAD TO THE TOP INC2× · 2024–2025 · $19k · revenue +199%
- CFCARING FIELDS FELINES INC6× · 2019–2025 · $13k · revenue +14%
Funded once
- FCFIDELITY CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDone grant, 2022 · $10k
- CFCARING FIELDS FELINESone grant, 2017 · $5k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Tri-county animal rescue is a no-kill, nonprofit animal shelter working to prevent the killing of over 573,000 unwanted pets in broward, miami-dade, and palm beach counties. tri-county has no boundaries; we go all over the u.s. whenever we…
To improve the health & well-being of animals through veterinary aid, response, training, research & local capacity building worldwide. We provide services to companion animals, horses, street dogs, livestock and marine animals including…
We transform the lives of animals with compassionate care and services, outstanding educational programs, and advocacy for all animals.
All about animals rescue's mission is no more homeless pets.
The mission of the organizaton is to help save the lives of countless unwanted cats and dogs by supporting organizations that offer free or low- cost spay and neuter services across the state of florida.
We rescue cats and dogs suffered on the street and in endangered locations in both new york and china. the mission of our no-kill shelter is to provide stray cats with safe haven and veterinary care before placing them in forever loving…
Rescue pointer dogs and treat back to health and f
To rescue abandoned, neglected and traumatized animals and find these animals their furever homes.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feline Rescue Inc and the most unlike its peers is Outcast Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 97 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
- Who funds THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ROAD TO THE TOP INC ↗
- Who funds CARING FIELDS FELINES INC ↗
- Who funds RIPON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds BROOKE USA INC ↗
- Who funds JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WINDRUSH FARM THERAPEUTIC EQUITATION INC ↗
- Who funds Wild Earth Allies Inc ↗
- Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
- Who funds PALM BEACH COUNTY CAT COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds KEVIN BABINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THOROUGHBRED RETIREMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Equine Rescue and Adoption Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds WILDLIFE CENTER FRIENDS INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PEDIATRIC CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Fishermans Mark ↗
- Who funds SERGEANTSVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds 1000 FRIENDS OF FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds DANNY & RONS RESCUE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Knopf Family Foundation Inc · Quaker City Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Leslie L Alexander Foundation Inc · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Verizon Foundation · AbbVie Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Thomas & Nephele Wing Domencich Fdn funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Joslin Diabetes Center Inc — 35% of income from government
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.