· Private foundation
Thomas and Kyle Futo Foundation
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2020.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2020
- Under $10k7 grants · $10k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Queen of the Valley Foundation | $10,000 |
| Kansas Food Bank | $2,500 |
| NAPA VALLEY FOOD BANK | $2,000 |
| Guadalupe Clinic Inc | $1,715 |
| PONY POWER THERAPIES | $1,500 |
| HUMANKIND MINISTRIES | $1,500 |
| RAMAPO FOR CHILDREN | $500 |
| Legacy Regional Community Foundatio | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2020, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2020, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- QOQUEEN OF THE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION3× · 2018–2020 · $35k · revenue +6%
- KFKANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC3× · 2018–2020 · $6k · revenue +36%
- CGCOMMUNITY GRIEF CENTER2× · 2017–2018 · $5k · revenue +67%
Funded once
- TATHE ALS ASSOCIATION MID-AMERICA CHAPTERone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -9%
- OHOLE HEALTH FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +125%
- KEKANSAS ELKS TRAINING CENTER FOR THE HANDICAPPED INCone grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +17%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Engaging and aligning providers and stakeholders to establish Kansas as a role model for health care quality and a top performer in health care outcomes.
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
To engage in grant making to medical educational organizations and related charitable activities in the area of eye disease and vision disorder, and the care and treatment thereof.
To support, assist and promote the interests and welfare of the programs and activities of the catholic diocese of wichita which provide health care services and health education to poor, distressed and underprivileged individuals.
Enriching western Kansas life through philanthropy, collaboration and leadership.
We are dedicated to providing exceptional healthcare - centered around you.
Villa st francis, a catholic, non-profit skilled nursing facility sponsored by the archdiocese of kansas city in olathe, provides dementia care, skilled nursing, respite, and hospice.
Hunter health (the center) operates three healthcare centers in wichita, ks. the center provides a broad range of health services to a largely medically underserved population. the us dept. of health and human services (dhhs) and indian…
To drive economic growth and community advancement in the wichita region.
Offer hope to build a better tomorrow through mental health services.
Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.
Wichita's littlest heroes (wlh) exists to provide hope, help, and happiness to families of children ages 0-18 in the kansas area who are battling life-threatening medical conditions. wlh strives to accomplish this be being a physical and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Senior Services Inc of Wichita and the most unlike its peers is St Helena Hospital Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds QUEEN OF THE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds St Helena Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds KANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds THE ALS ASSOCIATION MID-AMERICA CHAPTER ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY GRIEF CENTER ↗
- Who funds Youth Entrepreneurs Inc ↗
- Who funds Guadalupe Clinic Inc ↗
- Who funds HUMANKIND MINISTRIES WICHITA INC ↗
- Who funds OLE HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LEGACY A REGIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PONY POWER THERAPIES INC ↗
- Who funds KANSAS ELKS TRAINING CENTER FOR THE HANDICAPPED INC ↗
- Who funds WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SENIOR SERVICES INC OF WICHITA ↗
- Who funds RAMAPO FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds Wichita Downtown Development Corporation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · United Way of the Plains Inc · Wichita Foundation · Zack and Leilah Farha Charitable Foundation Inc · Daniel J Taylor Family Charitable Foundation · Dwane L and Velma Lunt Wallace Charitable Foundation · Berry Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Thomas and Kyle Futo Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.