Skip to content

Kansas · Private foundation

Thomas and Kyle Futo Foundation

$20k
Granted FY2020
8
Grants FY2020
7
Organizations funded FY2020
43%
First-time grantees FY2020
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2020
$1,715
Largest grant, FY2020
$10,000
Organizations funded a year
5 to 10
FY2017 to FY2020
States reached, FY2020
4

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2020, 43% of the organizations Thomas and Kyle Futo Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 20% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionReligionPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20207$20k43%
FY201910$34k70%
FY20189$23k67%
FY20175$9kn/a
97% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Health$57kFood & Nutrition$8kHuman Services$7kEducation$5kReligion$3kHousing & Shelter$3kCommunity Improvement$2kPhilanthropy$2kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2020, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 15 grantees

Plus 6 recipients with no EIN on record ($8k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Thomas and Kyle Futo Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetQueen of the Valley Medical Center Foundation: $35,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSt Helena Hospital Foundation: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKansas Foodbank Warehouse Inc: $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Grief Center: $5,000 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetThe Als Association Mid-America Chapter: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYouth Entrepreneurs Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGuadalupe Clinic Inc: $2,715 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHumankind Ministries Wichita Inc: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOle Health Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPony Power Therapies Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWichita State University Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKansas Elks Training Center for the Handicapped Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSenior Services Inc of Wichita: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWichita Downtown Development Corporation: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRamapo for Children Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 15.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353RI17× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · United Way of the Plains Inc · Wichita Foundation · Zack and Leilah Farha Charitable Foundation Inc · Daniel J Taylor Family Charitable Foundation · Dwane L and Velma Lunt Wallace Charitable Foundation · Berry Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Thomas and Kyle Futo Foundation with peer funders

About Thomas and Kyle Futo Foundation

How much does Thomas and Kyle Futo Foundation give?
Thomas and Kyle Futo Foundation reported 8 grants totaling $20,215 in its FY2020 IRS filing. It funded between 5 and 10 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2020.
What does Thomas and Kyle Futo Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2020, its largest causes are Health (65%), Food & Nutrition (9%), Human Services (8%).
Who are Thomas and Kyle Futo Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2020: Queen of the Valley Medical Center Foundation ($35k), St Helena Hospital Foundation ($10k), Kansas Foodbank Warehouse Inc ($6k).
Does Thomas and Kyle Futo Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2020, 43% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Thomas and Kyle Futo Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353, United Way of the Plains Inc, Wichita Foundation.
Where is Thomas and Kyle Futo Foundation based?
Thomas and Kyle Futo Foundation is based in KS.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2021) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Thomas and Kyle Futo’s filings →

More from the funding graph