Skip to content

· Private foundation

Thomas & Kelly Lieser Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$61k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$100kReligion$48kPhilanthropy$29kHealth$11kRecreation & Sports$9kFood & Nutrition$5kInternational$3kYouth Development$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $23k
$1,080
Median grant
2
States reached
$454k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
XAVIER UNIVERSITY$12,800
ST MARY SCHOOL - ANNUAL FUND$10,000
ST XAVIER HIGH SCHOOL$6,000
DEPAUL CRISTO REY$6,000
Individual grant recipient$5,353
ST MARY'S HYDE PARK$5,200
CISE$2,500
CINCINNATI TENNNIS FOUNDATION$2,100
ST MARY SCHOOL - SMS GYM SPONSORSHIP$1,600
QTEGO FUNDRAISING SERVICES$1,500
ARTSWAVE$1,500
ST FRANCIS DE SALES$1,080
CATHOLIC MINISTRIES APPEAL$1,000
IN CORPORATION - FINDLAY MARKET$1,000
FRIARS CLUB INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ST FRANCIS DE SALES: $1k → 18%ST FRANCIS DE SALES: $1k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MA
IN
OH
UT
KY
KS
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$130k · 13 repeat orgs$68k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
22

Total granted

$130k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+41%

Still filing today

38%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentReligionRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • XU
    XAVIER UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $41k · revenue +8%
  • TC
    The Cincinnati Tennis Foundation
    4× · 2022–2025 · $7k · revenue +226%
  • OD
    OUR DAILY BREAD
    3× · 2022–2025 · $3k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • WC
    WOMEN'S CARE CENTER OF CINCINNATI
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • SM
    ST MARY'S SCHOOL ANNUAL FUND 2021-22
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cincinnati Parks Foundation

To build broad based private/public partnerships supporting the conservation and enhancement of our City's parks and greenspaces.

Recreation & Sports
2
Cincinnati Usa Regional Chamber

To grow the vibrancy and economic prosperity of the cincinnati region.

—
3
Cincinnati Public Radio Inc

Cincinnati Public Radio is the trusted, independent source of journalism, music and culture empowering a vibrant, engaged and informed community.

Arts & Culture
4
Cincinnati Development Fund

To strengthen underserved neighborhoods and improve lives through innovative financing.

Housing & Shelter
5
Cincinnati Usa Regional Chamber Foundation

To develop and promote economic development, talent initiatives and the unique offerings in the cincinnati region.

Community Improvement
6
The Greater Cincinnati Film Commission

The Greater Cincinnati Film Commission is dedicated to maximizing the area's economic potential by attracting, promoting and cultivating film, television, and commercial production throughout Greater Cincinnati. Once filmmakers choose…

—
7
Hillel the Foundation of Jewish Campus Life

The purpose of Hillel is to be a center for enriching the lives of Jewish students in the Greater Cincinnati area and to strengthen Jewish identity through social and a broad range of programs and services in an atmosphere that is…

—
8
Cintrifuse

To empower Cincinnati entrepreneurs to launch bold, scalable startups; and we work to improve the odds of those startups growing into transformational companies.

Community Improvement
9
Cincinnati Chamber Orchestra

Cincinnati Chamber Orchestra (CCO) creates intimate, transformative experiences that connect the musically curious.

Arts & Culture
10
Cise Foundation

The specific purposes for which the foundation is formed are to provide financial support, and otherwise engage in or support efforts, activities, operations or projects intended to provide to children and families who are among the most…

Philanthropy
11
Cincinnati Concours D'elegance Foundation

The cincinnati concours foundation produces a three day weekend of fundraisers to benefit the juvenile arthritis programs and services of the arthritis foundation ohio river valley/great lakes region

Health
12
Spirit of Cincinnati

Welcomers community volunteer network of cincinnati usa/ northern kentucky is a network designed to connect area residents, who enjoy volunteering and welcoming visitors, with local attractions and arts, cultural and special events. the…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Greater Cincinnati Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Brandon C Gromada Head & Neck Cancer Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MARY: $19,030 · OtherST MARYST MARY SCHOOL INC: $17,300 · OtherST MARY SCHOOL INCDE PAUL CRISTO REY HIGH SCHOOL: $16,000 · OtherDE PAUL CRISTO REY HIGH SCHOOLWOMEN'S CARE CENTER OF CINCINNATI: $10,000 · OtherWOMEN'S CARE CENTER OF CINCINNATIST MARY SCHOOL - ANNUAL FUND: $10,000 · OtherST MARY SCHOOL - ANNUAL FUNDST XAVIER HIGH SCHOOL INC: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,353 · OtherST MARY'S HYDE PARK: $5,200 · OtherST MARY'S SCHOOL ANNUAL FUND 2021-22: $5,000 · Other+32 more: $31,231 · Other+32 moreXAVIER UNIVERSITY: $40,720 · EducationXAVIER UNIVERSITY+1 more: $207 · EducationHAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,824 · PhilanthropyHAMILTON COMMU…THE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE GREATER CI…COMMUNITY SHARES OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $2,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY SHAR…+1 more: $250 · PhilanthropyCISE: $18,500 · ReligionCISEThe Cincinnati Tennis Foundation: $7,175 · Recreation & SportsST FRANCIS DESALES: $2,080 · Human ServicesCincinnati Institute of Fine Arts: $1,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$125,114Education$40,927Philanthropy$28,074Religion$18,500Recreation & Sports$7,175Human Services$2,080Arts & Culture$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetXAVIER UNIVERSITY: $40,720 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,824 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCISE: $18,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe Cincinnati Tennis Foundation: $7,175 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTHE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUR DAILY BREAD: $2,516 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetST FRANCIS DESALES: $2,080 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY SHARES OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFriars Club Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCorporation for Findlay Market: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRANDON C GROMADA HEAD & NECK CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN OF GREATER CINCINN: $171 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds XAVIER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CISE ↗
  • Who funds The Cincinnati Tennis Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OUR DAILY BREAD ↗
  • Who funds ST FRANCIS DESALES ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SHARES OF GREATER CINCINNATI ↗
  • Who funds Cincinnati Institute of Fine Arts ↗
  • Who funds Friars Club Inc ↗
  • Who funds Corporation for Findlay Market ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH22.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Bob & Felicia Burger Family Foundation · Williams Foundation · Marge & Charles J Schott Foundation · The Northern Cincinnai Foundation · Charles H Dater Foundation Inc · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005 · Charities Aid Foundation America · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thomas & Kelly Lieser Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thomas & Kelly Lieser Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Thomas & Kelly Lieser Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph