Skip to content

· Private foundation

Thomas and Candace Dee Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$388k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$959kEducation$757kHuman Services$490kEnvironment$260kFood & Nutrition$210kCommunity Improvement$36kRecreation & Sports$25kArts & Culture$12k
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $153k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $220k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$9.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Boys and Girls Club of SLC$110,000
Ronald McDonald House$60,000
The Children's Center$50,000
The Nature Conservancy of Utah$25,000
Wasatch Community Gardens$25,000
University of Utah - Dept of Medici$25,000
Intermountain Foundation$15,000
Utah Clean Energy$15,000
Lewis Clark College$15,000
Seager Memorial Clinic$12,500
Westminster College$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Bear Lake Watch$5,000
Peery's Egyptian Theater$5,000
John A Moran Eye Center$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $105k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%Safe Harbor Crisis Center: $5k → 6%Neighborhood House: $35k → 8%Neighborhood House: $35k → 8%Neighborhood House: $30k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of Thomas and Candace Dee Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 88% of the giving stays in UT; by stated purpose, 84%.

Thomas and Candace Dee Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.7% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 18 repeat orgs$79k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
7

Total granted

$2.5M
$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+40%

Still filing today

39%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEnvironmentHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RM
    Ronald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $255k · revenue +75%
  • NH
    Neighborhood House Association
    3× · 2017–2019 · $100k · revenue +1%
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S CENTER UTAH
    4× · 2021–2024 · $100k · revenue +92%

Funded once

  • TA
    Tracy Aviary Botanical Gardens
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF UTAH
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • WR
    WOMENS RETREAT HOUSEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Healthy Environment Alliance of Utah

Heal utah's mission is to protect utah's environment and its people by promoting clean air, clean energy, and comprehensive solutions to radioactive and toxic waste.

Environment
2
Utah Public Lands Alliance
Education
3
Utah Valley Chamber of Commerce

Stimulate local business establishment, growth, and development by facilitating business to business and business to community relationships throughout Utah County.

—
4
Utah Humanities Council

Utah Humanities collaborates with libraries, museums, historical societies, schools, colleges, and cultural and civic groups; provides capacity-building opportunities for volunteers and professionals in the cultural sector; presents…

Arts & Culture
5
Wasatch Homeless Health Care

Help homeless Utahns improve their health and quality of life by providing high-quality health care and support services.

Health
6
Urban Indian Center of Salt Lake

To serve The People by honoring Native cultures, strengthening health and wellness programs, and cultivating community. We envision all Native peoples living balanced, prosperous, and healthy lives in diverse communities for Seven…

—
7
Utah Public Health Association

The Utah Public Health Association (UPHA) is a statewide membership organization dedicated to improving the health of Utah communities by supporting and representing the public health workforce. UPHA advances public health through…

Health
8
Utah Health Policy Project

To advance sustainable health care solutions for underserved utahns through better access, education, and public policy.

Health
9
Utah Energy Conservation Coalition Inc
Education
10
Utah World Trade Center

World trade center utah accelerates growth for utah companies through our global networks, programs, and services.

Community Improvement
11
Southwest Utah Community Health Center

Making lives better in southwest utah by providing accessible, quality health care, regardless of financial, language, or cultural barriers.

Health
12
Wasatch Wigeons Association

Improve utah's wetlands through hands-on conservation and community engagement

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Utah Clean Energy Alliance Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bear Lake Watch. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

John A Moran Eye Center: $390,000 · OtherJohn A Moran Eye CenterUniversity of Utah - College of Nur: $305,000 · OtherUniversity of Utah - College of NurLewis Clark College: $290,000 · OtherLewis Clark CollegeIntermountain Foundation: $199,114 · OtherIntermountain FoundationBoys and Girls Club of SLC: $190,000 · OtherBoys and Girls Club of SLCTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $175,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYUnited Way: $100,000 · OtherTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER UTAH: $100,000 · OtherUniversity of Utah - Dept of Medici: $75,000 · Other+10 more: $239,728 · Other+10 moreRonald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc: $255,000 · HealthRonald McDo…SEAGER MEMORIAL CLINIC: $25,000 · HealthSEAGER MEMO…+1 more: $5,000 · HealthWASATCH COMMUNITY GARDENS: $210,000 · Community ImprovementNeighborhood House Association: $100,000 · Human ServicesSAFE HARBOR CRISIS CENTER: $5,000 · Human ServicesBEAR LAKE WATCH: $40,000 · EnvironmentUTAH CLEAN ENERGY ALLIANCE INC: $15,000 · EnvironmentScenic Utah: $5,000 · EnvironmentWESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · Education
Other$2,063,842Health$285,000Community Improvement$210,000Human Services$105,000Environment$60,000Education$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc: $255,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetWASATCH COMMUNITY GARDENS: $210,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $175,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNeighborhood House Association: $100,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER UTAH: $100,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBEAR LAKE WATCH: $40,000 over 5y, 8.6% of budgetSEAGER MEMORIAL CLINIC: $25,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetWESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY: $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH CLEAN ENERGY ALLIANCE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWOMENS RETREAT HOUSE: $5,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetScenic Utah: $5,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetSAFE HARBOR CRISIS CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc ↗
  • Who funds WASATCH COMMUNITY GARDENS ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Neighborhood House Association ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S CENTER UTAH ↗
  • Who funds BEAR LAKE WATCH ↗
  • Who funds SEAGER MEMORIAL CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UTAH CLEAN ENERGY ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMENS RETREAT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Scenic Utah ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HARBOR CRISIS CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Willard L Eccles Charitable FoundationUT15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Willard L Eccles Charitable Foundation · Intermountain Community Care Foundation Inc · McCarthey Family Foundation · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · Making a Difference Foundation · Ihc Health Services Inc · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thomas and Candace Dee Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thomas and Candace Dee Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Thomas and Candace Dee Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Thomas and Candace Dee Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Thomas and Candace Dee Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph