Skip to content

· Private foundation

Thomas a Wendt Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$334k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$160k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$826kHousing & Shelter$83kHuman Services$77kHealth$63kFood & Nutrition$53kInternational$50kEducation$15kPublic Benefit$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $140k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $160k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$8.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CHAPEL$160,000
FEED MORE WNY$20,000
ST MATTHEW'S ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH$20,000
ST LUKES$20,000
THE BROTHERS OF MERCY$10,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$10,000
BUFFALO CITY MISSION$10,000
KEVINS GUEST HOUSE$10,000
EIGHT DAYS OF HOPE$10,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$10,000
JERICHO ROAD COMMUNITY CENTER$10,000
HEARTS FOR THE HOMELESS$10,000
SONRAY MINISTRIES$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT$5,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BUFFALO CITY MISSION: $10k → 13%BUFFALO CITY MISSION: $5k → 13%BUFFALO CITY MISSION: $5k → 13%BUFFALO CITY MISSION: $4k → 13%SONRAY MINISTRIES: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
CO
MD
NC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 24 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +9% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
7

Total granted

$1.1M
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
-1%

Still filing today

46%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthReligionInternationalHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $39k · revenue +39%
  • KG
    KEVIN GUEST HOUSE INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $21k · revenue +22%
  • THE SUMMIT CENTER INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $16k · revenue +93%

Funded once

  • SM
    ST MATTHEW LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
  • HP
    HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE BUFFALO INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -1%
  • ID
    IMMUNE DEFICIENCY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
2
Mission of Mercy
—
3
Sisters Servants of Mary Ministers to the Sick Inc

To care for the physical and spiritual needs of the sick in their own homes at no charge.

—
4
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
5
Mercy Home for Children Inc

Mercy home provides essential services for children and adults with developmental disabilities. mercy home's mission is to ensure the quality of life for persons with developmental disabilities through the recognition of each person's…

—
6
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
7
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
8
St Lukes Episcopal-Presbyterian Hospitals

We are dedicated to providing exceptional care to every patient, every time.

Health
9
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
10
Mercy Medical Center

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
11
Medical Missions Outreach Inc

In 2005, medical missions outreach began pointing others to the great physician through an annual medical missions trip to the developing world by partnering with local churches to reach their communities with the gospel. now more than 20…

International
12
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice & Palliative Care Buffalo Inc; the most unlike its peers is Historical Society of the Tonawandas Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
8/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CHAPEL: $700,000 · OtherTHE CHAPELFEED MORE WNY: $53,000 · OtherFEED MORE WNYST LUKES: $48,500 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY: $36,000 · Other+14 more: $154,300 · Other+14 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $38,500 · International+1 more: $1,000 · InternationalAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY: $11,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10,900 · ReligionBROTHERS OF MERCY HOLDING INC: $10,000 · ReligionKEVIN GUEST HOUSE INC: $21,000 · HealthHOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE BUFFALO INC: $5,000 · HealthTHE MAST CELL DISEASE SOCIETY INC: $2,000 · Health+3 more: $2,200 · HealthCITY MISSION SOCIETY INC: $23,500 · Human ServicesSONRAYS MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesEIGHT DAYS OF HOPE INC: $27,500 · Housing & ShelterTHE SUMMIT CENTER INC: $16,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY: $10,000 · EducationROSWELL PARK ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $12,000 · Philanthropy
Other$991,800International$39,500Religion$31,900Health$30,200Human Services$28,500Housing & Shelter$27,500Education$26,000Philanthropy$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $38,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEIGHT DAYS OF HOPE INC: $27,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCITY MISSION SOCIETY INC: $23,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetKEVIN GUEST HOUSE INC: $21,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetTHE SUMMIT CENTER INC: $16,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetROSWELL PARK ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10,900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSONRAYS MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetHOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE BUFFALO INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MAST CELL DISEASE SOCIETY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetIMMUNE DEFICIENCY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLET THEM LOL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FAMILIESCN2A FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHISTORICAL SOCIETY OF THE TONAWANDAS INC: $600 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMADONNA OF THE STREETS INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds EIGHT DAYS OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY MISSION SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds KEVIN GUEST HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SUMMIT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ROSWELL PARK ALLIANCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds BROTHERS OF MERCY HOLDING INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY ↗
  • Who funds SONRAYS MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE BUFFALO INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MAST CELL DISEASE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds IMMUNE DEFICIENCY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LET THEM LOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FAMILIESCN2A FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF THE TONAWANDAS INC ↗
  • Who funds MADONNA OF THE STREETS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo IncNY19.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo Inc · William & Diane Hein Foundation · E&W G Foundation · The John R Oishei Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thomas a Wendt Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thomas a Wendt Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Thomas a Wendt Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph