· Private foundation
Thomas a Demetrio Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $8k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $61k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LAWYERS LEND-A-HAND TO YOUTH | $61,000 |
| THE PANHELLENIC SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| CHICAGO BAR FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| CENTER FOR DISABILITY AND ELDER LAW INC | $10,000 |
| ILLINOIS JUDGES FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| CONCUSSION AND CTE FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| SKOKIE COUNTRY CLUB EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $145k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +67% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.
20 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LLLawyer Lend-A-Hand to Youth4× · 2021–2025 · $116k · revenue +186%
- CFCenter for Disability & Elder Law Inc6× · 2017–2025 · $92k · revenue +217%
- TCTHE CHICAGO BAR FOUNDATION7× · 2017–2025 · $61k · revenue +262%
Funded once
INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +4%- TTTHE TRIAL LAWYER HALL OF FAME INCone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -24%
- MHMERCY HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLSone grant, 2019 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…
Aia chicago foundation invests in chicago's next generation of architectural change-makers by awarding scholarships, grants, and recognition.
To promote public appreciation, understanding and support of the humanities through festivals and educational programs.
The Foundation, a 501(c)(3) charitable organization, is an independent and separate nonprofit entity from the University of Illinois. Our mission is to encourage and administer private gifts and serve the UI System by working closely with…
At legal aid chicago, we work together to provide high quality civil legal aid to people living in poverty and other vulnerable groups.through advocacy, education, collaboration, and litigation we empower individuals, protect fundamental…
Cedille Chicago, NFP is devoted to the activity of producing and marketing recordings of classical music by Chicago-area musicians and composers.
The mission of the Foundation is to dramatically improve the lives of people living with peripheral neuropathy. It is focused on discovering more effective treatment options and finding a cure for peripheral neuropathy. The Foundation…
Improve oral health by providing funds for dental education and access to care programs
PILI engages, inspires and empowers those advancing equal access to justice.
Lake Forest Graduate School of Management's mission is to bring the real world to business education and leadership development.
Our mission is to strengthen and heal families and individuals from all walks of life through clinical service, education and research.
Supports the study and practice of law by supporting university of illinois chicago law school.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Access Living of Metropolitan Chicago and the most unlike its peers is Endure Charities Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Lawyer Lend-A-Hand to Youth ↗
- Who funds Center for Disability & Elder Law Inc ↗
- Who funds THE CHICAGO BAR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Big Shoulders Fund ↗
- Who funds Panhellenic Scholarship Foundation ↗
- Who funds MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE 100 CLUB OF ILLINOIS ↗
- Who funds THE TRIAL LAWYER HALL OF FAME INC ↗
- Who funds Hellenic Bar Association Foundation ↗
- Who funds Access Living of Metropolitan Chicago ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO POLICE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Illinois Institute of Technology ↗
- Who funds Constitutional Rights Foundation Chicago ↗
- Who funds McDermott Center ↗
- Who funds FACIAL PAIN RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Spirit of 67 Foundation ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS BRITTLE BONE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds National Hellenic Museum ↗
- Who funds The Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame ↗
- Who funds LAKE FOREST HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Shield 23 Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds FAMILY FOCUS LEGACY ↗
- Who funds Gorton Community Center ↗
- Who funds ENDURE CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED SPINAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Baird Foundation Inc · AbbVie Foundation · Sunshine Charitable Foundation · The Sidley Austin Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Thomas a Demetrio Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.