· Private foundation
Theodore R and Vivian M Johnson Scholarship Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 53% of THEODORE R AND VIVIAN M JOHNSON SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k28 grants · $63k
- $10k–50k24 grants · $569k
- $50k–250k28 grants · $3.7M
- $250k+11 grants · $5.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PALM BEACH ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY | $955,000 |
| SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA | $805,000 |
| GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY | $595,000 |
| FLORIDA SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF AND THE BLIND | $595,000 |
| STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION | $560,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION | $435,000 |
| FORT LEWIS COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $323,253 |
| MARTIN FAMILY INITIATIVE | $299,075 |
| UNITED TRIBES TECHNICAL COLLEGE | $250,000 |
| PATHWAYS TO EDUCATION CANADA | $250,000 |
| BRIDGES FROM SCHOOL TO WORK | $250,000 |
| FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $244,650 |
| COLLEGE FOR KIDS INC | $240,000 |
| NATIVE FORWARD SCHOLARS FUND | $201,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA ANCHORAGE | $200,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 32% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
134 repeat relationships — 77 still active in FY2024, 57 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $563k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PBPALM BEACH ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY INC8× · 2017–2024 · $9.6M · revenue +51%
- GUGALLAUDET UNIVERSITY8× · 2017–2024 · $4.6M · revenue +21%
- CFCOLLEGE FOR KIDS INC7× · 2018–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +85%
Funded once
- TSTAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN - COLLEGE FOR KIDSone grant, 2017 · $563k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION-DISADVANTAGEDone grant, 2021 · $400k
- IOINSTITUTE OF AMERICAN INDIAN ARTS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $300k · revenue -63%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities accredits institutions of higher education by applying evidence-informed standards and processes to support continuous improvements and promote equitable student achievement and success.
We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.
Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.
To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…
Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Indian College Fund and the most unlike its peers is The Robert and Deborah Jacobson Charitable Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
106 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 106 of the 188 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PALM BEACH ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE FOR KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds Bridges from School to Work Inc ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LANDMARK COLLEGE INC ↗
- Who funds CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds NATIVE FORWARD SCHOLARS FUND ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST INDIAN COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Providence St Mel School ↗
- Who funds GROVES ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds THE FORT LEWIS COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HERITAGE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds OGLALA LAKOTA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR HEARING RESEARCH INC WEINGARTEN CHILDRENS CENTER ↗
- Who funds ELEVATION SCHOLARS INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST INDIAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EYE TO EYE INC DBA THE NEURODIVERSITY ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AANIIIH NAKODA COLLEGE (FORT BELKNAP COLLEGE) ↗
- Who funds Florida Agricultural & Mechanical Univ Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds ULSTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Indian College Fund · First Nations Development Institute · Ascendium Education Solutions Inc · American Indian Higher Education Consortium Inc · Northwest Area Foundation · Native American Agriculture Fund · Ndn Collective Inc · The Ford Foundation · Helen Gough Fdn Trust · Community Foundation of North Central Florida · Wells Fargo Foundation · Fidelity Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Theodore R and Vivian M Johnson Scholarship Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Peaceful Paths Inc — 39% of income from government
- Bridges from School to Work Inc — 33% of income from government
- Transitional Living of North Central Florida Inc — 16% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Perkins School for the Blind — 7% of income from government
- United Way of Palm Beach County Inc — 1% of income from government
- Landmark College Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Bottom Line Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Center for Effective Philanthropy Inc — 0% of income from government
- National Indian Child Welfare Association — 0% of income from government
- Sendmemissions Inc — 0% of income from government
- Santa Fe College Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Palm Beach Atlantic University Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.