· Private foundation
Theodore P and Bonnie M Cohen Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $5k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MT HOLYOKE COLLEGE | $10,846 |
| REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ST LOUIS REG | $2,500 |
| NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS | $1,000 |
| CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE | $1,000 |
| EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE | $500 |
| PHI BETA KEPPA SOCIETY | $135 |
| BROWN UNIVERSITY | $100 |
| CLINIC CAN HELP | $75 |
| TEMPLE EMANUEL OF PALM BEACH | $50 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 98% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +11% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
THE TRUSTEES OF MOUNT HOLYOKE COLLEGE8× · 2018–2025 · $195k · revenue +11%- MHMercy Health Foundation2× · 2023–2024 · $6k · revenue +34%
- CACLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC3× · 2023–2025 · $3k · revenue +8%
Funded once
- OCOVARIAN CANCER NATL ALLIANCEone grant, 2018 · $5k
- BHBRONX HIGH SCHOOL OF SCIENCE ALUMNI FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue -71%
- EGELIZA GROVER MEMORIAL FUNDone grant, 2024 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…
See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.
The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.
The mission of the breast cancer research foundation, inc. is to prevent and cure breast cancer by advancing the world's most promising research.
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…
To aid the alliance for clinical trials in oncology national clinical trials cooperative group and support the clinical trials and laboratory research of the alliance, as well as efforts to educate the medical community on methods of…
Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Diabetes Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Feeding America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF MOUNT HOLYOKE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Mercy Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds Reproductive Health Services of Planned Parenthood Great Rivers ↗
- Who funds ST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds Trust Women Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds BRONX HIGH SCHOOL OF SCIENCE ALUMNI FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC ↗
- Who funds ELIZA GROVER MEMORIAL FUND ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL OVARIAN CANCER COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds YALE NEW HAVEN HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds Palm Beach County Food Bank Inc ↗
- Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds HEARING THE OVARIAN CANCER WHISPER INC ↗
- Who funds CLINICS CAN HELP INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL SCLERODERMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds Swim Across America Inc ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds BARNARD COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds DIABETES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds The Institute For Cancer Research ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Theodore P and Bonnie M Cohen Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Diabetes Foundation Inc — 31% of income from government
- Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Trustees of Mount Holyoke College — 1% of income from government
- Yale New Haven Hospital — 0% of income from government
- Palm Beach County Food Bank Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.