How much did THEODORE AND BEULAH BEASLEY FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 72% of THEODORE AND BEULAH BEASLEY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

covid testingnorth foodfood bankshakespearekidsexpansionemergency covid

2021

visionaccessyoungcirclemuseumcampusmedical

2022

pledgechurchteensyoungspecialmedicalchristian

2023

nutritionchurchpantrycircleeducationalformerlystudent

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 97 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k15 grants · $86k
$10k–50k54 grants · $1.0M
$50k–250k27 grants · $2.1M
$250k+1 grant · $250k

$25,000

Median grant

States reached

$72M

Total assets

Largest grants

NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK$250,000
CENTRAL COMMONS CHURCH$150,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$150,000
DALLAS AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$125,000
GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF DALLAS$125,000
CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$100,000
TEXAS WOMEN'S FOUNDATION$100,000
ENVISION DALLAS$100,000
CHILD CARE GROUP$100,000
UT MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$75,000
AUSTIN STREET CENTER$75,000
ENCORE PARK DALLAS$75,000
SCHOLARSHOT$75,000
GILMONT CAMP & CONFERENCE CENTER$70,000
DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER$70,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$11M · 108 repeat orgs$2.2M to everyone else

108 repeat relationships — 61 still active in FY2024, 47 since wound down; 36 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

108

Total granted

$11M

$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%

+60%

Still filing today

58%

42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthEducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

NT
NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK
5× · 2020–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +49%
PE
PARISH EPISCOPAL SCHOOL
3× · 2020–2022 · $520k · revenue +13%
DA
DALLAS AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
4× · 2020–2024 · $400k · revenue +71%

Funded once

C
CHILDCAREGROUPgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $150k · revenue +90%
DO
DISCIPLES OF DIVINITY HOUSE
one grant, 2020 · $140k
DZ
DALLAS ZOO MANAGEMENT INCgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $125k · revenue +26%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas

A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.

Health

Dallas Area Rape Crisis Center

DARCC is committed to engaging and educating communities to prevent sexual violence and supporting survivors and their loved ones as they heal and thrive.

Human Services

Dallas Christian School

Private christian school education - preschool through high school.

Education

COMMIT2DALLAS

Our mission is that by 2040, at least half of all 25 to 34 year old residents of Dallas County, irrespective of race, will earn a living wage.

Education

The McCombs School of Business

To provide support to The University of Texas McCombs School of Business.

Education

Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education

Dallas Center for the Performing Arts

To be a catalyst for imaginative excellence that enables economic and artistic growth for dallas.

Philanthropy

Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

To advocate the interest and enhance the viability of hospitals in dallas, fort worth, and north texas and to strengthen the relationship of hospitals to the communities they serve

—

Dallas Center Inc

To provide individualized services that positively impact the lives of 0-3 year old children with developmental disabilities/delays and their families.

Human Services

Goodwill Industries of Dallas Inc

Goodwill Industries of Dallas, Inc. is a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help people with barriers to employment build skills, find jobs and reach their goals in life so that they can reach their full potential and experience…

Employment

Dallas Seminary Foundation

To support the mission of Dallas Theological Seminary by offering charitable planned giving and other related services to friends of the Seminary.

Education

The Dallas County System of Services Inc

To unify services across Dallas County, to empower youth, strengthen families and build safe, healthy communities.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dallas Children's Advocacy Center and the most unlike its peers is Brite Divinity School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.9%1/107

the rest of the field

15%

2,170/14,095

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

103 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

99/103

Grantees still filing

71/103

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$10,026,003Human Services$1,213,100Health$879,000Education$565,800Arts & Culture$278,500Youth Development$230,000Crime & Legal$177,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dallas FoundationTX94.4× affinity55 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dallas Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Hoblitzelle Foundation · W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Moody Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation · The Perot Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · Gil and Dody Weaver Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THEODORE AND BEULAH BEASLEY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE STOREHOUSE.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 721303676 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on THE STOREHOUSE, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 35% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Theodore and Beulah Beasley Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Theodore and Beulah Beasley Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THEODORE AND BEULAH BEASLEY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

103 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Theodore and Beulah Beasley Foundation?

More from the funding graph

THEODORE AND BEULAH BEASLEY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

103 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Theodore and Beulah Beasley Foundation?

More from the funding graph