Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Thelma Braun & Bocklett Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$175k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 86% of THELMA BRAUN & BOCKLETT FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $152k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DENISON ISD$32,000
DENISON ISD$30,000
DENISON MAIN STREET INC$25,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
JUNIOR LEAGUE OF GRAYSON COUNTY$15,000
SHERMAN SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION INC$10,000
SHERMAN COMMUNITY PLAYERS$10,000
THE SHERMAN MUSEUM$10,000
UNITED WAY OF GRAYSON COUNTY INC$7,500
CHILDREN'S CHORUS OF GREATER NORTH TEXAS$5,000
UNITED WAY OF GRAYSON COUNTY INC$5,000
DENISON PERFORMING ARTS INC$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GRAYSON COUNTY SHELTER: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 14 repeat orgs$223k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
12

Total granted

$1.1M
$191k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+14%

Still filing today

43%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionYouth DevelopmentArts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DI
    DENISON ISD
    9× · 2017–2025 · $659k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    8× · 2017–2025 · $120k
  • SC
    SHERMAN COMMUNITY PLAYERS
    8× · 2017–2025 · $65k · revenue -2%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF GRAYSON
    one grant, 2020 · $40k
  • WV
    WHITESBORO VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2020 · $40k
  • TR
    TEXAS RAMP PROJECTgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +144%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Garrison Volunteer Fire Department

To provide fire and medical emergency services for the city of garrison, tx and the surrounding districts.

Public Safety & Disaster
2
Freestone County Historical and Museum Association Inc

To honor the history of Freestone County

Arts & Culture
3
Denison Arts Council

To promote tourism awareness in the city of denison, texas.

Human Services
4
Wise County Domestic Violence Task Force

To assist sexual assault and domestic violence victims. To operate a safe shelter and provide counseling services.

Crime & Legal
5
Denton County Crime Stoppers Inc

Crime Stop.

6
Rhome Community Library

Provide library services including books, computerized library services, literacy/learning programs for all ages to the citizens of Rhome and surrounding areas of Wise County Texas.

Education
7
Denison Service League

The denison service league is an organization of women whose mission is to advance women's leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration and training.

Community Improvement
8
Dawson County Senior Citizens Center Inc

Provide meals on wheels, congregate meals, and recreational facility for elderly and low income persons of dawson county texas.

9
Grant County Historical Society Elbow Lake

Presevering historical information in grant county

10
Waskom Volunteer Fire Department & Ems Services Inc

Firefighter & emergency medical services for the waskom, tx area.

Public Safety & Disaster
11
Central Texas Pregnancy Care Center

Pregnancy counseling

Human Services
12
Shelby County Historical Society

The education of the public on Shelby County history.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Grayson County Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Sherman Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DENISON ISD — $659,000 · OtherDENISON ISDIndividual grant recipient — $120,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSHERMAN COMMUNITY PLAYERS — $65,000 · OtherSHERMAN COMMUNITY PLAYERS+17 more — $370,500 · Other+17 moreDENISON MAIN STREET INC — $35,000 · Community ImprovementDENISON HELPING HANDS — $22,500 · Food & NutritionGRAYSON GRAND CENTRAL STATION — $7,500 · Food & NutritionTHE SHERMAN MUSEUM — $20,000 · Arts & CultureRED RIVER RAILROAD MUSEUM — $10,000 · Arts & CultureTEXAS RAMP PROJECT — $25,000 · Housing & ShelterGRAYSON COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentPROJECT TRANSFORMATION NORTH TEXAS — $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentPVES FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$1,214,500Community Improvement$35,000Food & Nutrition$30,000Arts & Culture$30,000Housing & Shelter$25,000Youth Development$21,000Public Safety & Disaster$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSHERMAN COMMUNITY PLAYERS — $65,000 over 8y, 5.1% of budgetDENISON MAIN STREET INC — $35,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetSHERMAN SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION INC — $25,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetDENISON HELPING HANDS — $22,500 over 2y, 8.0% of budgetTHE SHERMAN MUSEUM — $20,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetGRAYSON COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC — $15,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCASA OF GRAYSON COUNTY INC — $15,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GRAYSON COUNTY INC — $12,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTexoma Family Shelter — $10,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetRED RIVER RAILROAD MUSEUM — $10,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetPROJECT TRANSFORMATION NORTH TEXAS — $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHERMAN COMMUNITY PLAYERS
  • Who funds DENISON MAIN STREET INC
  • Who funds TEXAS RAMP PROJECT
  • Who funds SHERMAN SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds DENISON HELPING HANDS
  • Who funds THE SHERMAN MUSEUM
  • Who funds GRAYSON COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC
  • Who funds PVES FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CASA OF GRAYSON COUNTY INC
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GRAYSON COUNTY INC
  • Who funds Texoma Family Shelter
  • Who funds RED RIVER RAILROAD MUSEUM
  • Who funds GREATER TEXOMA HEALTH CLINIC
  • Who funds GRAYSON GRAND CENTRAL STATION
  • Who funds PROJECT TRANSFORMATION NORTH TEXAS

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oliver Dewey Mayor FoundationOK32.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oliver Dewey Mayor Foundation · W B Munson Foundation Xxxxx5008 · Elias & Hanna Regensburger Foundation · Clara B & W Aubrey Smith Charitable · Texoma Community Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Dr & Mrs Paul Pierce Memorial Foundation · Dorset Foundation Inc Attn Marty Sanderson · United Way of Grayson County Inc · R D Beirne Trust Fund · Tr Uw Minnie M Jones · Texoma Medical Center Volunteers

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Thelma Braun & Bocklett Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Thelma Braun & Bocklett Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Thelma Braun & Bocklett Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph