· Private foundation
Fundacion Zaqueo
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k14 grants · $61k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $91k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WOMEN IN NEED INC | $75,000 |
| RAISE THE CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL | $25,000 |
| LITTLE SISTERS OF THE ASSUMPTION FAMILY HEALTH SER | $15,000 |
| PARENTS OF P S 334 INC | $15,000 |
| HUNTER COLLEGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PARENT TEACHER AS | $14,450 |
| ST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $12,000 |
| NEW YORK RESTORATION PROJECT | $10,000 |
| BREARLEY SCHOOL | $7,600 |
| NEW COMMONWEALTH RACIAL EQUITY AND SOCIAL JUSTICE | $7,500 |
| PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE | $7,500 |
| GRACE EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $6,500 |
| READ AHEAD INC | $5,000 |
| TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | $5,000 |
| ST PETERS CHURCH | $5,000 |
| BENCHMARK ONE COMPANY FUND INC | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $195k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $59k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
WOMEN IN NEED INC3× · 2022–2024 · $188k · revenue +20%- RTRAISE THE CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL3× · 2022–2024 · $45k · revenue +158%
- RMRURAL & MIGRANT MINISTRY INC2× · 2022–2023 · $38k · revenue +29%
Funded once
- CCCORNELIA CONNELY CENTER FOR EDUCATIONone grant, 2022 · $20k
- HCHUNTER COLLEGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PARENT TEACHERone grant, 2022 · $11k
- SNSPARKYOUTH NYC INCone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -2%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
School in the square ("s2") engages, educates and empowers adolescents to respond mindfully and creatively to life's opportunities and challenges. s2 is a place where students, families and educators are seen, heard, and inspired and where…
Excellence community schools prepares young people in new york city and stamford to compete for admission to and succeed in top public, private and parochial high schools by cultivating their intellectual, artistic, social, emotional, and…
The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…
The robert louis stevenson school's mission is to provide a college preparatory program for bright adolescents who have not reached their potential in more traditional school settings. the program provides every student individually…
Cristo rey brooklyn is a catholic high school partnering with families of all creeds to educate deserving young people from underserved communities to become men and women of faith, purpose, and service. by integrating a rigorous…
Luria academy is a child-centered environment dedicated to academic excellence and a sophisticated knowledge of jewish text and jewish heritage. located in the prospect heights neighborhood of brookly, luria academy is a jewish…
Darrow school is dedicated to serving students with diverse backgrounds and abilities, building on each student's talents and interests to inspire enduring confidence for success in college and life. this mission is accomplished through…
To advance students' economic and social mobility by improving public education.
To help academically talented new york city students from low-income families earn admission into the most selective secondary schools and colleges.
New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…
To achieve educational equity for students from traditionally underserved communities by utilizing master teachers to provide rigorous academics, arts, and athletics instruction (the 3 a's).
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Little Sisters of the Assumption Family Health Service Inc and the most unlike its peers is Shark Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WOMEN IN NEED INC ↗
- Who funds RAISE THE CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds RURAL & MIGRANT MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds HUNTER COLLEGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PARENT TEACHER ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds PARENTS OF PS 334 INC ↗
- Who funds THE BREARLEY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds City Squash Inc ↗
- Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE ASSUMPTION FAMILY HEALTH SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK RESTORATION PROJECT ↗
- Who funds SPARKYOUTH NYC INC ↗
- Who funds THE NEW COMMONWEALTH RACIAL EQUITY AND SOCIAL JUSTICE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds READ AHEAD INC ↗
- Who funds THE ART EFFECT OF THE HUDSON VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds BENCHMARK ONE COMPANY FUND INC ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds THE SPENCE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds SQUASH AND EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds SESAME WORKSHOP ↗
- Who funds Young Investors Society ↗
- Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF EASTERN MASSCHUSETTS INC ↗
- Who funds CRISTO REY NEW YORK HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds SHARK FUND ↗
- Who funds LINK EDUCATION PARTNERS INC ↗
- Who funds Kips Bay Boys & Girls Club ↗
- Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Boston Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Lazard Charitable Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Fundacion Zaqueo funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Fundacion Zaqueo?
Find your warmest path to Fundacion Zaqueo through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.