Skip to content
The Yung Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Yung Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$6.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$15MPhilanthropy$1.5MHousing & Shelter$1.3MEducation$1.2MFood & Nutrition$1.0MYouth Development$250kInternational$70kCrime & Legal$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $649k
  • $250k+4 grants · $5.5M
$100,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST ELIZABETH HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION - CANCER INSTITUTE$2,000,000
CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER$1,500,000
THE CHRIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$1,000,000
ST ELIZABETH HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION - HEART AND VASCULAR INSTITUTE$1,000,000
THE POINT ARC OF NORTHERN KY$200,000
CISE (CATHOLIC INNER-CITY SCHOOLS EDUCATION)$174,000
THOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY$100,000
ALLIANCE FOR CATHOLIC URBAN EDUCATION ACUE$100,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER CINCINNATI$75,000
REDWOOD SCHOOL & REHABILITATION CENTER INC - DBA EASTERSEALS REDWOOD$30,000
ST PIUS X SCHOOL$25,000
NORTHERN KENTUCKY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER$10,000
ST PIUS X SCHOOL$5,000
CASA OF THE NORTHERN BLUEGRASS REGION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $1.0M → 11%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL HOME BASE PROGRAM: $1.0M → 16%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $20k → 6%SCID ANGELS FOR LIFE FOUNDATION: $36k → 16%SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION INC: $50k → 9%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $75k → 16%MASTER PROVISIONS INC: $1.0M → 7%SAINT PHILIP PARISH: $14k → 10%THE POINT ARC OF NORTHERN KY: $200k → 11%HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS: $250k → 11%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL HOME BASE PROGRAM: $1.0M → 16%SCID ANGELS FOR LIFE FOUNDATION: $36k → 16%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $75k → 16%NORTHERN KENTUCKY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $10k → 7%ALLIANCE FOR CATHOLIC URBAN EDUCATION ACUE: $100k → 11%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL HOME BASE PROGRAM: $1.0M → 16%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $50k → 16%ALLIANCE FOR CATHOLIC URBAN EDUCATION ACUE: $100k → 11%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $50k → 16%ALLIANCE FOR CATHOLIC URBAN EDUCATION ACUE: $100k → 11%GREATER CINCINNATI BEHAVORIAL HEALTH SERVICES: $10k → 16%ALLIANCE FOR CATHOLIC URBAN EDUCATION ACUE: $100k → 11%CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $1.5M → 16%ALLIANCE FOR CATHOLIC URBAN EDUCATION ACUE: $100k → 11%THE CHRIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1.0M → 16%ST ELIZABETH HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION - CANCER INSTITUTE: $2.0M → 11%THE CHRIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1.0M → 16%ST ELIZABETH HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION - HEART AND VASCULAR INSTITUTE: $1.0M → 11%THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $728k → 16%ST ELIZABETH HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION - HEART AND VASCULAR INSTITUTE: $1.0M → 11%THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $728k → 16%ST ELIZABETH HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION - HEART AND VASCULAR INSTITUTE: $1.0M → 11%THE CHRIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $200k → 16%ST ELIZABETH HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION - HEART AND VASCULAR INSTITUTE: $1.0M → 11%THE CHRIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $100k → 16%THOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY: $100k → 11%THE CHRIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $100k → 16%ST PIUS X SCHOOL: $42k → 11%THE DRAGONFLY FOUNDATION: $35k → 16%REDWOOD SCHOOL & REHABILITATION CENTER INC - DBA EASTERSEALS REDWOOD: $30k → 11%CISE (CATHOLIC INNER-CITY SCHOOLS EDUCATION): $328k → 16%ST PIUS X SCHOOL: $25k → 11%CISE (CATHOLIC INNER-CITY SCHOOLS EDUCATION): $174k → 16%REDWOOD SCHOOL & REHABILITATION CENTER INC - DBA EASTERSEALS REDWOOD: $10k → 11%CASA OF THE NORTHERN BLUEGRASS REGION: $5k → 11%CASA OF THE NORTHERN BLUEGRASS REGION: $5k → 11%ST PIUS X SCHOOL: $5k → 11%CASA OF THE NORTHERN BLUEGRASS REGION: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 33% of The Yung Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Yung Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$16M · 14 repeat orgs$4.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +99% since the first grant, against -13% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
5

Total granted

$16M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+99%
-13%

Still filing today

57%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.8M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyReligionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    The Christ Hospital Foundation
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.4M · revenue +322%
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $1.5M · revenue +23%
  • HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $1.3M · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • MP
    MASTER PROVISIONS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue -24%
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -13%
  • TD
    THE DRAGONFLY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $35k · revenue -27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Christ Hospital

Improve the health of our community and create patient value by providing exceptional outcomes and the finest experiences, all in an affordable way.

Health
2
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
3
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
4
Children's Hospital Medical Center

Cincinnati children's hospital medical center will be the leader in improving child health. cincinnati children's will provide child health and transform delivery of care through fully integrated, globally recognized research, education,…

Health
5
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
6
Children's Home of Northern Kentucky Inc

A trauma-informed Healthcare Organization, CHNK Behavioral Health creates Holistic Partnerships for Health and Wellness that are inclusive, innovative and inspiring.

Human Services
7
ProKids

Advocates on behalf of abused and neglected Children. Mobilizing our community to break the vicious cycle of child abuse and neglect and provide outstanding advocacy for abused and neglected children who are in the juvenile court system.

Civil Rights
8
Family Nurturing Center of Kentucky

The mission of Family Nurturing Center is to end the cycle of child abuse by promoting individual well-being and healthy family relationships. We envision a world with safe children, thriving families and nurturing communities and offer a…

—
9
The Good Samaritan Hospital of Cincinnati Ohio

The organization's mission is to improve the health status of the community it serves.

Health
10
Children's National

Children's national coordinates the overall policy and activities of the affiliated organizations. see schedule o.

Health
11
Memphis Child Advocacy Center

The mission is to serve children who are victims of sexual and severe physical abuse through prevention, education, and intervention.

Crime & Legal
12
Chmc Community Health Services Network

Chmc community health services network ("chsn") is organized and operated exclusively to support cincinnati children's hospital medical center ("cchmc") in cchmc's efforts to provide medical services to all of the children in the community.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Christ Hospital Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Jewish National Fund (Keren Kayemeth Leisrael) Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST ELIZABETH HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION - HEART AND VASCULAR INSTITUTE: $4,000,000 · OtherST ELIZABETH HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION - HEART AND VASCULAR INSTITUTEMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL HOME BASE PROGRAM: $3,000,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL HOME BASE PROGRAMTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $2,000,000 · OtherTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATIONST ELIZABETH HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION - CANCER INSTITUTE: $2,000,000 · OtherST ELIZABETH HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION - CANCER INSTITUTEMASTER PROVISIONS INC: $1,000,000 · OtherMASTER PROVISIONS INCALLIANCE FOR CATHOLIC URBAN EDUCATION ACUE: $500,000 · Other+5 more: $608,953 · OtherThe Christ Hospital Foundation: $2,400,000 · HealthThe Christ Hospital Fo…CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $1,500,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ME…+4 more: $95,000 · HealthTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $1,456,667 · PhilanthropyHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $1,250,000 · Housing & ShelterCISE: $502,000 · ReligionTHOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY INC: $100,000 · Education+1 more: $2,000 · EducationSave The Children Federation Inc: $50,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $20,000 · InternationalCASA OF THE NORTHERN BLUEGRASS REGION INC: $15,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$13,108,953Health$3,995,000Philanthropy$1,456,667Housing & Shelter$1,250,000Religion$502,000Education$102,000International$70,000Crime & Legal$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Christ Hospital Foundation: $2,400,000 over 5y, 19% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $1,500,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $1,456,667 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $1,250,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetMASTER PROVISIONS INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetCISE: $502,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $250,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetTHOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRedwood School & Rehabilitation Inc: $40,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE DRAGONFLY FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASA OF THE NORTHERN BLUEGRASS REGION INC: $15,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetGreater Cincinnati Behavioral Health Services: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN KENTUCKY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Johnson Charitable Gi…Duke Energy FoundationHorizon Community Fun…The Greater Cincinnat…The Wyler Family Foun…The R C Durr Foundati…Ge Aerospace Foundati…Charities Aid Foundat…American Endowment Fo…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…
Johnson Charitable Gift FundOH19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Duke Energy Foundation · Horizon Community Funds of Northern Kentucky · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · The Wyler Family Foundation · The R C Durr Foundation Inc 541 Buttermilk Pike Suite 500 · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Yung Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Yung Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Yung Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home