· Public charity
The Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Seattle (6871)
Building a community where all people, especially the young, are encouraged to develop their fullest potential in spirit, mind, and body.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 14 grants below total $4,001,509 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $6,626,626 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,625,117 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $50k–250k10 grants · $850k
- $250k+4 grants · $3.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YMCA OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY | $2,068,901 |
| YMCA OF PIERCE AND KITSAP COUNTIES | $466,811 |
| YMCA OF GRAYS HARBOR | $316,698 |
| SKAGIT VALLEY YMCA | $299,288 |
| WALLA WALLA YMCA | $162,962 |
| WENATCHEE VALLEY YMCA | $158,242 |
| SOUTH SOUND YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSN | $132,948 |
| YMCA OF THE INLAND NORTHWEST | $79,189 |
| ESSEX COMMUNITY OUTREACH CORPORATION | $62,500 |
| YAKIMA FAMILY YMCA | $53,970 |
| WHATCOM FAMILY YMCA | $50,000 |
| YMCA OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON | $50,000 |
| OLYMPIC PENINSULA YMCA | $50,000 |
| YMCA OF TRI-CITIES | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $4.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
15 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YMYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PIERCE AND KITSAP COUNTIES2× · 2024–2025 · $934k · revenue +13%
- TSThe Skagit Valley Family YMCA2× · 2024–2025 · $599k · revenue +24%
- TCTUW C HADLEY FBO WENATCHEE YMCA2× · 2024–2025 · $316k · revenue +73%
Funded once
- NYNEXUS YOUTH AND FAMILIESone grant, 2024 · $1.7M · revenue 0% · 100% of their budget
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $20k
- JMJOHN MUIR ELEMENTARY PTSAgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +433%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.
The mission of the brainerd family ymca is to enhance the lives in the brainerd lakes area by connecting individuals and families with opportunities based on christian values that build a healthy spirit, mind, & body.
The shasta family ymca strengthens community through programs and activities that create a healthy spirit, mind and body for all.
Guided by our christian principles, we strengthen the spirit mind and body of all individuals.
Our mission is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all. our focus is on youth development, healthy living and social responsibility. we help kids succeed, prepare teens…
Building a community where all people, especially the young, are encouraged to develop their fullest potential in spirit, mind, and body. strategic goals: *provide opportunities for youth and young adults that shape values and encourage…
Helping all people reach their God-given potential in spirit, mind and body. The Y strives to strengthen the foundations of the communities we serve through programs and services that promote youth development, healthy living, and social…
Community can only be achieved when we invest in our kids, our health and our neighbors well-being. financial assistance is available to any person who cannot afford to pay the full price for any ymca program or membership. all ymca…
The missoula family ymca's mission is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all. the y serves families and individuals of all ages, abilities, incomes, races and religions.…
The Treasure Valley Family YMCA strengthens the foundation of our community by developing successful youth, engaging people in healthy living, and instilling a commitment to social responsibility.
The mission of the lake county ymca is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.
The y's programs focus on improving people's spiritual, intellectual, and physical well-being to support people as they actualize their fullest potential. the ymca serves community members of all abilities, ages, cultural backgrounds,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ymca of the Greater Tri-Cities and the most unlike its peers is Tuw C Hadley Fbo Wenatchee Ymca. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 52 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NEXUS YOUTH AND FAMILIES ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PIERCE AND KITSAP COUNTIES ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Grays Harbor ↗
- Who funds The Skagit Valley Family YMCA ↗
- Who funds WALLA WALLA YMCA ↗
- Who funds TUW C HADLEY FBO WENATCHEE YMCA ↗
- Who funds SOUTH SOUND YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSN ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of the Inland Northwest ↗
- Who funds YAKIMA YMCA QALICB ↗
- Who funds OLYMPIC PENINSULA YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSN ↗
- Who funds WHATCOM FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds YMCA OF THE GREATER TRI-CITIES ↗
- Who funds THE YMCA OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds ESSEX COMMUNITY OUTREACH CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTH ↗
- Who funds JOHN MUIR ELEMENTARY PTSA ↗
- Who funds GRAHAM HILL ELEMENTARY PTA ↗
- Who funds National Council of YMCAs of the USA ↗
- Who funds College Success Foundation ↗
- Who funds YMCA BLUE RIDGE ASSEMBLY INC ↗
- Who funds SIOUX YMCA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: National Council of YMCAs of the USA · School's Out Washington · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Medina Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Ndc Housing & Economic Development Corporation - Group Return · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Seattle (6871) funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.