Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Yancey Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$52k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$145kYouth Development$67kFood & Nutrition$52kHealth$39kPhilanthropy$35kHuman Services$11kReligion$11kHousing & Shelter$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $36k
$4,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$661k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Brookstone School$15,500
El Refugio$10,000
Feeding the Valley Food Bank$10,000
Muscogee County Library Foundation$7,000
Next Stepp Animal Rescue$4,000
Wholesome Wave$3,000
Animal Ark Rescue$1,000
Trinity Episcopal Church$1,000
Open Door Community House$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Open Door Community House: $1k → 18%Open Door Community House: $1k → 18%Open Door Community House: $500 → 18%Open Door Community House: $250 → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$360k · 19 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
8

Total granted

$360k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+147%

Still filing today

42%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentFood & NutritionEducationReligionAnimalsEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    BROOKSTONE SCHOOL INC
    4× · 2017–2025 · $59k · revenue +27%
  • FT
    Feeding the Valley Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $52k · revenue +836%
  • MO
    MERCYMED OF COLUMBUS INC ATTN TONY NGUYEN
    7× · 2017–2024 · $25k · revenue +231%

Funded once

  • CS
    Columbus State University
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • HF
    HEART FOR AFRICA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $4k · revenue +68%
  • CH
    Columbus Housing Initiative Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +147%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Farmers Markets Inc

To develop a local food infrastructure for long term sustainability and meaningful community impact and grow a diverse local food culture by maintaining an authentic space for all people to share community, fair food, and healthy…

Food & Nutrition
2
Appling County Food Bank Inc

Our mission is to provide free food to needy families in appling county.

Food & Nutrition
3
Central Illinois Foodbank Inc

The Foodbank's mission is to provide food, and develop awareness of and creative solutions for food insecurity. Annually, the Foodbank distributes approximately 9.5 million pounds of food to 130 food pantries, soup kitchens, children's…

Food & Nutrition
4
Coastal Harvest

Feed the hungry and assist our partner agencies free of charge.

Human Services
5
Community Foodworks

Pioneering strategies for an equitable and resilient community-based food system.

—
6
A Christian Food Pantry Inc

Serve food to families and individuals in need.

—
7
Covenant Care Services Inc

Covenant Care Services, Inc. is a non-profit faith-based adoption agency serving birthmothers and adoptive families in the state of Georgia. The Organization counsels women experiencing unplanned pregancy and educates them about the option…

Human Services
8
Christians Reaching Out to Society Inc

CROS serves the hungry by distributing food at local pantries, recovering and distributing fresh produce that would otherwise go to waste, serving lunch at local meal sites, delivering prepared meals to the homebound.

Religion
9
Feeding Southwest Virginia

To provide food and other related products primarily to member agencies for distribution to those in need, and also for direct distribution.

Food & Nutrition
10
Stowe Mission of Central Ohio

Christ-focused ministry to inner city residents in central Ohio.

Community Improvement
11
Local Food Solutions

We work to expand access to local food for more people in the community through the purchase, aggregation, storage, marketing and delivery of fresh, safe, local food in partnership with local growers.

Food & Nutrition
12
Southeast Gwinnett Cooperative Ministry Inc

To provide food and emergency financial assistance to families in need throughout Southeastern Gwinnett County, Georgia

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Truth Spring Inc; the most unlike its peers is St Margarets House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MUSCOGEE COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $91,725 · OtherMUSCOGEE COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION INCBoys and Girls Clubs Inc: $41,225 · OtherBoys and Girls Clubs IncGirls Inc: $25,425 · OtherGirls IncTRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $9,125 · Other+19 more: $57,150 · Other+19 moreBROOKSTONE SCHOOL INC: $59,125 · EducationBROOKSTONE SCHO…+1 more: $1,500 · EducationFeeding the Valley Inc: $51,950 · Food & NutritionFeeding the Val…WHOLESOME WAVE GEORGIA INC: $6,375 · Food & NutritionWHOLESOME WAVE …COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE CHATTAHOOCHEE VALLEY INC: $35,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY…MERCYMED OF COLUMBUS INC ATTN TONY NGUYEN: $25,100 · HealthEASTER SEALS WEST GEORGIA INC: $13,500 · EmploymentEL REFUGIO MINISTRY INC: $10,000 · ReligionHEART FOR AFRICA INC: $3,500 · Religion
Other$224,650Education$60,625Food & Nutrition$58,325Philanthropy$35,000Health$25,100Employment$13,500Religion$13,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBROOKSTONE SCHOOL INC: $59,125 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding the Valley Inc: $51,950 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE CHATTAHOOCHEE VALLEY INC: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMERCYMED OF COLUMBUS INC ATTN TONY NGUYEN: $25,100 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetEASTER SEALS WEST GEORGIA INC: $13,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWHOLESOME WAVE GEORGIA INC: $6,375 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetValley Interfaith Promise Inc: $6,000 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetNEXT STEPP ANIMAL RESCUE INCORPORATED: $4,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetHEART FOR AFRICA INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOPEN DOOR COMMUNITY HOUSE INC: $3,150 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetColumbus Housing Initiative Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRUTH SPRING INC: $1,950 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGEORGIA ORGANICS INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FOOD MILL: $1,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetChattahoochee Valley Episcopal: $1,500 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetColumbus State University Foundation Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSt Margarets House: $650 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BROOKSTONE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding the Valley Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE CHATTAHOOCHEE VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds MERCYMED OF COLUMBUS INC ATTN TONY NGUYEN ↗
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS WEST GEORGIA INC ↗
  • Who funds EL REFUGIO MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds WHOLESOME WAVE GEORGIA INC ↗
  • Who funds Valley Interfaith Promise Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEXT STEPP ANIMAL RESCUE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds HEART FOR AFRICA INC ↗
  • Who funds OPEN DOOR COMMUNITY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds WHOLESOME WAVE INC ↗
  • Who funds Columbus Housing Initiative Inc ↗
  • Who funds TRUTH SPRING INC ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA ORGANICS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD MILL ↗
  • Who funds Chattahoochee Valley Episcopal ↗
  • Who funds Columbus State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL ARK RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds St Margarets House ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Chattahoochee Valley IncGA36.3× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Chattahoochee Valley Inc · Lockwood Partners Foundation Inc · Bradley-Turner Foundation Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Beloco Foundation Inc · John P and Dorothy S Illges Foundation Inc · The Jordan Foundation Inc · The Daniel P Amos Family Foundation · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Elizabeth Fry and Dupont Kirven Foundation Inc · Jackson-Burgin Foundation Inc · Gb & Ca Saunders Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Yancey Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Yancey Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Yancey Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Yancey Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Yancey Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph