· Private foundation
Elizabeth Fry and Dupont Kirven Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 73% of ELIZABETH FRY AND DUPONT KIRVEN FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k21 grants · $73k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $34k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OPEN DOOR COMMUNITY HOUSE | $13,000 |
| FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH | $11,000 |
| ANNE ELIZABETH SHEPHERD HOME | $10,000 |
| BRIDGE OF COLUMBUS INC | $5,000 |
| RELEASE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| TRUTH SPRINGS RENTAL PROPERTY | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| VALLEY RESCUE MISSION | $5,000 |
| MANNA FOOD BANK | $5,000 |
| NEW RIVER COMMUNITY AND TECH COLLEG | $5,000 |
| SAFEHOUSE MINISTRIES | $5,000 |
| WYNNTON NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE | $5,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $5,000 |
| STEWART COMMUNITY HOME | $4,000 |
| ST PAUL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH | $4,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $101k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
28 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ODOPEN DOOR COMMUNITY HOUSE INC7× · 2018–2024 · $90k · revenue +57%
- VRVALLEY RESCUE MISSION7× · 2018–2024 · $35k · revenue +40%
- BOBRIDGE OF COLUMBUS INC7× · 2018–2024 · $31k · revenue +61%
Funded once
- UCUPTOWN COLUMBUS INCone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -30%
- SOSPRINGER OPERA HOUSE ARTS ASSOCIATIONINCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +198%
- TCTWIN CEDARSone grant, 2020 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Stabilize neighborhoods through establishing financing, education, rehabilitation of existing housing and development of new housing
To create a cornerstone of dignity, security and opportunity through quality affordable homes and strong communities.
We are a church related, non-profit organization dedicated and committed to providing services for older adults by creating and preserving excellent residential facilities. we believe in and are committed to honoring each person's dignity,…
Chapel pointe at carlisle is a continuing care retirement community of the christian and missionary alliance and is for persons of all faiths. our mission is to provide comfortable retirement living and quality care and service to each…
To care for, engage, and inspire our community to reimagine and maximize quality of life at every age.
Cch builds and manages quality affordable housing in caring communities.
Cornwall manor offers diversified and high quality housing, health care and related services for individuals to achieve a retirement and aging lifestyle they find fulfilling in a secure, caring and christian environment.
The mission of west view manor is to foster, maintain and operate a christian continuing care senior living community that provides older persons with caring and quality services toward the enhancement of their physical, mental, and…
Provide housing to low-income families.
Retirement housing
We are a church related, non-profit organization dedicated and committed to providing services for older adults by creating and preserving excellent residential facilities. we believe in and are committed to honoring each person's dignity,…
Provide housing for low income elderly persons age 62 and over without regard to race, color, creed, national origin, religion, sex, familial status or disability.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Truth Spring Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Wynn House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OPEN DOOR COMMUNITY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds VALLEY RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds BRIDGE OF COLUMBUS INC ↗
- Who funds NEW RIVER COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE STEWART COMMUNITY HOME INC ↗
- Who funds WYNNTON NEIGHBORHOOD NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds MIDTOWN INC ↗
- Who funds PENICK VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds UPTOWN COLUMBUS INC ↗
- Who funds SPRINGER OPERA HOUSE ARTS ASSOCIATIONINC ↗
- Who funds COLUMBUS HOSPICE INC ↗
- Who funds BROOKSTONE SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds Valley Interfaith Promise Inc ↗
- Who funds THE WYNN HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds International Friendship Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds PASTORAL INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TRUTH SPRING INC ↗
- Who funds MANNA FOOD BANK INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Chattahoochee Valley Inc · Lockwood Partners Foundation Inc · Bradley-Turner Foundation Inc · The Daniel P Amos Family Foundation · McClure Family Foundation Inc Co Truist Foundations & Endowments Spec · Beloco Foundation Inc · Gb & Ca Saunders Foundation Inc · The Jordan Foundation Inc · Jw & Ethel I Woodruff Foundation Inc · John P and Dorothy S Illges Foundation Inc · The Cms Foundation Inc · Mildred Miller Fort Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Elizabeth Fry and Dupont Kirven Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.