Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jackson-Burgin Foundation Inc

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$86k
Granted FY2018
21
Grants FY2018
1
States reached
$40k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Jackson-Burgin Foundation Inc’s FY2019 grant dollars went to Community Foundation Of The Chattahoochee Valley Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2019 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2018, the last year Jackson-Burgin Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 14 organizations, $86k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

24
17
14
18
3
19

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172019.

Philanthropy$2.2MReligion$87kArts & Culture$30kHealth$28kCommunity Improvement$15kEnvironment$4kYouth Development$4kHousing & Shelter$4kOther$0
02FY2018 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k20 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST PAUL UMC$40,000
HISTORIC COLUMBUS FOUNDATION$8,000
WESLEY GLEN MINISTRIES$8,000
MIDTOWN INC$7,000
THE NATIONAL CIVIL WAR NAVAL MUSEUM$5,880
EASTER SEALS$2,000
COLUMBUS BOTANICAL GARDEN$2,000
ST PETER UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$2,000
STEWART COMMUNITY HOME$2,000
THE RIVER OF COLUMBUS CHURCH$1,500
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$1,000
RIVERCENTER$1,000
COALITION FOR SOUND GROWTH$1,000
HOPE HARBOUR$1,000
SPRINGER OPERA HOUSE$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 22%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 22%OPEN DOOR COMMUNITY HOUSE: $750 → 18%OPEN DOOR COMMUNITY HOUSE: $500 → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 93% of Jackson-Burgin Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in GA; read by stated purpose it is 8% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Jackson-Burgin Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$163k · 18 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2018, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call). Read against FY2018, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
16

Total granted

$163k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+69%

Still filing today

72%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WG
    Wesley Glen Ministries Inc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $24k · revenue +68%
  • HC
    HISTORIC COLUMBUS FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $16k · revenue +233%
  • ES
    EASTER SEALS SOUTHERN GEORGIA INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $4k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • CS
    Columbus State University Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +69%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF CHATTAHOOCHEE VALLEY
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • CH
    Columbus Housing Initiative Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue +147%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbus Board of Realtors Inc

The Columbus Board of REALTORS is a visible advocate of the real estate industry, providing members with career building education and enhancing the quality of life in our community.

2
Columbus Charities

Receive and provide contributions for charitable and educational activities

3
Greater Columbus Chamber of Commerce

The purpose of the greater columbus chamber of commerce is to promote and develop civic, educational, commercial and industrial interests in columbus, georgia and certain surrounding areas.

4
Columbus Zoological Park Association

Empowering people. saving wildlife.

Animals
5
Community Shelter Board

The community shelter board is ending homelessness by creating collaborations, innovating solutions, and investing in quality programs.

6
Columbus Music Commission

To nurture a community where people can prosper in the business of music while contributing to columbus' overall cultural and economic growth.

Community Improvement
7
Columbus Area Arts Council Inc

To enhance the quality of life in the community by stimulating community interest in art, fostering creation and inquiry throughout columbus, and leading a vibrant arts culture tied to our unique history.

Arts & Culture
8
Columbus Foundation

Entrusted with the responsibility to improve the community's quality of life, the columbus foundation embraces the following: to assist donors and others in strengthening and improving the community for the benefit of all its residents.

Philanthropy
9
Columbus Youth Foundation

The columbus youth foundation supports recreational programs for underprivileged youth in columbus.

10
Columbus Alliance for Regional Investment Inc

Support to the greater columbus chamber of commerce for expenses related to the young professionals, partners in education, and inter-city leadership programs in the columbus, georgia area.

Community Improvement
11
The Columbus Museum

Maintain and operate a museum to collect, preserve and display articles of our community history which is open to the public

Arts & Culture
12
Columbus Regional Shelter for Victims of Domestic Violence

To work towards the prevention and elimination of domestic and dating violence.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Columbus Museum Inc and the most unlike its peers is Riverdale-Porterdale Cemetery. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
22/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE CHATTAHOOCHEE VALLEY INC — $2,240,770 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE CHATTAHOOCHEE VALLEY INC+1 more — $500 · PhilanthropyST PAUL UMC — $80,000 · OtherWesley Glen Ministries Inc — $24,000 · OtherHISTORIC COLUMBUS FOUNDATION INC — $16,000 · OtherTHE NATIONAL CIVIL WAR NAVAL MUSEUM — $5,880 · Other+20 more — $19,850 · OtherMIDTOWN INC — $14,000 · Community ImprovementTrees Columbus Inc — $1,000 · Community ImprovementCOLUMBUS PHILHARMONIC GUILD INC — $3,000 · Arts & CultureRIVERCENTER INC — $2,000 · Arts & CultureSPRINGER OPERA HOUSE ARTS ASSOCIATIONINC — $2,000 · Arts & CultureHISTORIC LINWOOD FOUNDATION — $500 · Arts & Culture+3 more — $750 · Arts & CultureEASTER SEALS SOUTHERN GEORGIA INC — $4,000 · HealthColumbus Alliance for Battered Women Inc dba Hope Harbour — $2,000 · Human ServicesOPEN DOOR COMMUNITY HOUSE INC — $1,250 · Human ServicesTHE COLUMBUS BOTANICAL GARDENS INC — $2,250 · Environment
Philanthropy$2,241,270Other$145,730Community Improvement$15,000Arts & Culture$8,250Health$4,000Human Services$3,250Environment$2,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE CHATTAHOOCHEE VALLEY INC — $2,240,770 over 2y, 10% of budgetWesley Glen Ministries Inc — $24,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHISTORIC COLUMBUS FOUNDATION INC — $16,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetMIDTOWN INC — $14,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetEASTER SEALS SOUTHERN GEORGIA INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHATTAHOOCHEE COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COLUMBUS BOTANICAL GARDENS INC — $2,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRIVERCENTER INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPRINGER OPERA HOUSE ARTS ASSOCIATIONINC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE STEWART COMMUNITY HOME INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOPEN DOOR COMMUNITY HOUSE INC — $1,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetColumbus State University Foundation Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetColumbus Housing Initiative Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOWETA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOUR HOUSE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKSTONE SCHOOL INC — $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERDALE-PORTERDALE CEMETERY — $250 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetYOUTH ORCHESTRA OF GREATER COLUMBUS INC — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLUMBUS MUSEUM INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Chattahoochee Valley IncGA50.6× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Chattahoochee Valley Inc · Lockwood Partners Foundation Inc · The Jordan Foundation Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Mildred Miller Fort Foundation Inc · Jw & Ethel I Woodruff Foundation Inc · Thornton Jordan Family Foundation Inc · The Cliboca Foundation Inc · The Daniel P Amos Family Foundation · Bradley-Turner Foundation Inc · Richard and Helen Robbins Family Foundation Inc · The Patton Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jackson-Burgin Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph