Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Wristen Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$192kArts & Culture$60kInternational$51kYouth Development$41kEducation$35kPhilanthropy$32kHuman Services$15kCrime & Legal$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,200
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CASA of McHenry County$7,500
The Orchard Evangelical Free Church$5,000
Direct Relief$5,000
Cary Grove Food Pantry$5,000
Young Life (Madison WI)$5,000
The Navigators$5,000
Safe Families for Children$4,200
Individual grant recipient$3,500
Willow Creek Community Church$3,000
Foundry Church$3,000
The Orchard Evangelical Free Church$3,000
Cru$3,000
Intervarsity$2,000
The Orchard Evangelical Free Church$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $44k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%The Orphan Network: $9k → 10%Warp Corps: $1k → 6%The Orphan Network: $9k → 10%The Orphan Network: $8k → 10%The Orphan Network: $6k → 10%The Orphan Network: $6k → 10%Safe Families for Children: $4k → 14%Breaking Ground: $900 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
MI
IA
OH
CA
CO
VA
SC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$425k · 18 repeat orgs$113k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
18

Total granted

$425k
$85k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+0%
+29%

Still filing today

22%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionEducationInternationalCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA
    7× · 2017–2023 · $42k · revenue +9%
  • TC
    THE COLUMBUS ACADEMY
    2× · 2022–2023 · $25k · revenue +12%
  • CO
    CASA OF MCHENRY COUNTY INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $13k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • MB
    MIDAMERICA BAPTIST CONFERENCE
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • MD
    MISSIO DEI CHICAGO
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • TO
    TRINITY OAKS CHRISTIAN ACADEMYgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +29%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
2
Child Hope International

We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.

Arts & Culture
3
Children of Promise Inc

Children of Promise provides nutrition education and health care for children in need in developing nations.

Human Services
4
New Road Missions

We are compelled by god's word to provide security, education and the hope of jesus to children in south africa so they can thrive personally and impact their future families, communities and the kingdom of god.

Religion
5
Orphan Outreach

To glorify the Lord Jesus Christ by ministering to orphans around the world by meeting spiritual, physical, emotional, and educational needs.

International
6
Christian Alliance for Orphans

Christian Alliance for Orphans (CAFO) exists to unite an alliance in shared initiatives that inspire and equip God's people to care effectively for vulnerable children and families, rooted always in Christian discipleship and the life of…

Human Services
7
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
8
Calvary Children's Home

Our purpose is to provide a safe, loving, Christian environment for children needing long-term care who lack a stable home environment due to circumstances beyond their control. We are committed to equipping each child to build meaningful…

Human Services
9
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
10
The Orphans Hands Inc

The Orphan's Hands provides a safe home and education for orphaned youth at risk of being trafficked in high-risk countries while bringing the love and hope of Jesus.

International
11
Contagious Disciple Making

Helping the hardest to reach people of North America Develop a relationship with Christ

Human Services
12
Christs Hope U S a Inc

Empowering orphaned and vulnerable children to break the cycles of extreme poverty, AIDS, and spiritual brokenness through family-based care and discipleship in Jesus Christ.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Water Missions International; the most unlike its peers is Casa of Mchenry County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE NAVIGATORS: $60,377 · OtherTHE NAVIGATORSORCHARD EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH: $59,500 · OtherORCHARD EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCHTHE EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF AMERICA: $31,500 · OtherTHE EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF AMERICALiving Grace Community Church: $22,000 · OtherLiving Grace Community ChurchCRU: $21,000 · OtherCRUIndividual grant recipient: $18,500 · OtherWILLOW CREEK COMMUNITY CHURCH INC: $15,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherRELIANT MISSION INC: $14,750 · OtherYouth For Christ - Campus Life: $13,000 · Other+21 more: $108,980 · Other+21 moreInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA: $42,000 · ReligionInterVarsity…MISSION EURASIA: $10,750 · ReligionMISSION EURA…Created for More Ministries NFP: $5,000 · ReligionCreated for …The Orphanetwork: $38,000 · Human ServicesThe Orpha…SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE: $4,200 · Human ServicesSAFE FAMI…+2 more: $1,900 · Human ServicesTHE COLUMBUS ACADEMY: $25,000 · EducationTRINITY OAKS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $10,000 · EducationCASA OF MCHENRY COUNTY INC: $13,250 · Crime & LegalDIRECT RELIEF: $5,000 · InternationalWATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $2,682 · International
Other$380,107Religion$57,750Human Services$44,100Education$35,000Crime & Legal$13,250International$7,682

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA: $42,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetThe Orphanetwork: $38,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE COLUMBUS ACADEMY: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCASA OF MCHENRY COUNTY INC: $13,250 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMISSION EURASIA: $10,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY OAKS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBy The Hand Club For Kids: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCARY GROVE FOOD PANTRY: $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCreated for More Ministries NFP: $5,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE: $4,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $2,682 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWARP CORPS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBREAKING GROUND INC: $900 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA ↗
  • Who funds The Orphanetwork ↗
  • Who funds THE COLUMBUS ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF MCHENRY COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSION EURASIA ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY OAKS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds By The Hand Club For Kids ↗
  • Who funds CARY GROVE FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds Created for More Ministries NFP ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds WATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds WARP CORPS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL14.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Wristen Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Wristen Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Wristen Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Wristen Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wristen Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph