Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Workable Alternatives Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$120k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$160kCivil Rights$160kInternational$135kEnvironment$110kPublic Benefit$60kFood & Nutrition$40kArts & Culture$35kPublic Safety & Disaster$15k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION$25,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION$25,000
DEMOCRACY NOW$10,000
TYPE MEDIA CENTER$10,000
NATIONAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL$10,000
PHYSICIANS FOR NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAM$10,000
350ORG$10,000
JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE$5,000
INTERNATIONAL PHYSICIANS FOR THE PREVENTION OF NUCLEAR WAR$5,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$5,000
GLOBAL LINKS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 74% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%INTERNATIONAL PHYSICIANS FOR THE PREVENTION OF NUCLEAR WAR: $10k → 8%GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $20k → 11%NATIONAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL: $10k → 17%350org: $10k → 20%WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN: $5k → 14%PHYSICIANS FOR NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAM: $10k → 14%INTERNATIONAL PHYSICIANS FOR THE PREVENTION OF NUCLEAR WAR: $10k → 8%GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $10k → 11%NATIONAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL: $10k → 17%350ORG: $10k → 20%WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN: $5k → 14%Physicians for a National Health Program: $5k → 14%INTERNATIONAL PHYSICIANS FOR THE PREVENTION OF NUCLEAR WAR: $10k → 8%Greater Pittsburgh Comm Food Bank: $10k → 11%National Resouerces Defense Council: $10k → 17%350ORG: $10k → 20%Internationl Physicians for the Prev of Nuclear War: $10k → 8%GLOBAL LINKS: $10k → 11%NATIONAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL: $10k → 17%350ORG: $10k → 20%INTERNATIONAL PHYSICIANS FOR THE PREVENTION OF NUCLEAR WAR: $10k → 8%GLOBAL LINKS: $10k → 11%NATIONAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL: $10k → 17%GLOBAL LINKS: $10k → 11%NATIONAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL: $10k → 17%GLOBAL LINKS: $10k → 11%PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION: $25k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION: $20k → 17%Planned Parenthood Federation: $20k → 17%THOMAS MERTON CENTER: $10k → 11%PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION: $20k → 17%THOMAS MERTON CENTER: $10k → 11%PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION: $20k → 17%Thomas Merton Center: $10k → 11%PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION: $20k → 17%DEMOCRACY NOW: $10k → 17%TYPE MEDIA CENTER: $10k → 17%Democracy Now: $10k → 17%DEMOCRACY NOW: $10k → 17%DEMOCRACY NOW: $10k → 17%DEMOCRACY NOW: $10k → 17%DEMOCRACY NOW: $10k → 17%AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION: $20k → 17%AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION: $20k → 17%American Civil Liberties Union Fdtn: $20k → 17%AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION: $20k → 17%AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION: $20k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$665k · 13 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
4

Total granted

$665k
$50k

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEnvironmentArts & CultureHealthCivil RightsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $125k · revenue +40%
  • AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $105k · revenue +27%
  • IP
    INTERNATIONAL PHYSICIANS FOR THE PREVENTION OF NUCLEAR WAR
    5× · 2021–2025 · $45k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • AC
    American Civil Liberties Union Fdtn
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • GP
    Greater Pittsburgh Comm Food Bank
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • NR
    National Resouerces Defense Council
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Policy Forum Inc

Research and education of United Nations activities

International
2
Womens Foreign Policy Group Inc

Founded in 1995 wfpg works to expand the foreign policy dialogue across policital divides and generations and to support women at every stake of their careers. as champions of womens leadership we are proud of our role in expanding the…

International
3
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
4
Global Poverty Project Inc

Our mission is to build a movement of global citizens whose actions will help achieve our vision of a world without extreme poverty.

Social Science
5
Partnership for Global Security

The partnership for global security (pgs) is a recognized international leader and innovator in nuclear and transnational security policy developing actionable responses to 21st century security challenges by engaging international,…

International
6
Center for Arms Control and

A nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to enhancing international peace and security in the 21st century, thereby retaining its focus on nuclear weapons but expanding to include other present emerging security threats.

International
7
International Peace Institute Inc

The international peace institute (ipi) bridges policy and real-world diplomacy, advising global leaders and shaping innovative policy solutions across the multilateral system, governments, and beyond through independent research and…

International
8
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
9
Partnership for Policy Integrity

Partnership for Policy Integrity (PFPI) uses data-driven advocacy and litigation to fight for forests, communities and the climate.

Environment
10
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
11
Committee to Protect Journalists Inc

The committee to protect journalists promotes press freedom worldwide and defends the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal. cpj ensures the free flow of news and commentary by taking action wherever…

Civil Rights
12
The Fund for Peace Inc

Building bridges across diverse sectors, and developing innovative technologies and tools for policy makers. a leader in the conflict assessment and early warning field, the fund for peace focuses on the problems of weak and failing…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Natural Resources Defense Council Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GLOBAL LINKS: $50,000 · InternationalGLOBAL LINKSINTERNATIONAL PHYSICIANS FOR THE PREVENTION OF NUCLEAR WAR: $45,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL PHYSICIANS F…Thomas Merton Center Inc: $30,000 · InternationalThomas Merton Center IncA JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE: $25,000 · InternationalA JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACEWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $15,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $125,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD …350ORG: $60,000 · Environment350ORGNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $50,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES…AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $105,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL L…DEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC: $60,000 · Arts & CultureDEMOCRACY NOW P…TYPE MEDIA CENTER INC: $35,000 · Arts & CultureTYPE MEDIA CENT…PHYSICIANS FOR A NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAM: $35,000 · OtherPHYSICIANS FO…American Civil Liberties Union Fdtn: $20,000 · OtherAmerican Civi…Greater Pittsburgh Comm Food Bank: $10,000 · OtherGreater Pitts…National Resouerces Defense Council: $10,000 · OtherNational Reso…Internationl Physicians for the Prev of Nuclear War: $10,000 · OtherInternationl …GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $30,000 · Food & Nutrition
International$165,000Health$125,000Environment$110,000Civil Rights$105,000Arts & Culture$95,000Other$85,000Food & Nutrition$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $125,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $105,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budget350ORG: $60,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetDEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL LINKS: $50,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL PHYSICIANS FOR THE PREVENTION OF NUCLEAR WAR: $45,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetTYPE MEDIA CENTER INC: $35,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPHYSICIANS FOR A NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAM: $35,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThomas Merton Center Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetA JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE: $25,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds 350ORG ↗
  • Who funds DEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL LINKS ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL PHYSICIANS FOR THE PREVENTION OF NUCLEAR WAR ↗
  • Who funds TYPE MEDIA CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PHYSICIANS FOR A NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Thomas Merton Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds A JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA9.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Workable Alternatives Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Workable Alternatives Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Workable Alternatives Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Workable Alternatives Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Workable Alternatives’ filings →

    More from the funding graph