Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Wj Jones Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$315k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$613kHuman Services$460kHousing & Shelter$185kYouth Development$75kFood & Nutrition$50kCivil Rights$29kPublic Safety & Disaster$20kReligion$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $125k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $190k
$40,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION$90,000
CITIZENS CARING FOR CHILDREN$50,000
REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA$50,000
POSITIVE TOMORROWS$40,000
TENACIOUSLY TEAL$35,000
DIABETES SOLUTIONS OF OKLAHOMA$25,000
A CHANCE TO CHANGE$15,000
ST LUKES METHODIST CHURCH$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $205k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%THE CARE CENTER: $30k → 16%THE CARE CENTER: $30k → 16%THE CARE CENTER: $25k → 16%THE CARE CENTER: $25k → 16%THE CARE CENTER: $20k → 16%PIVOT OK: $25k → 16%PIVOT INC: $25k → 16%PIVOT INC: $25k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 92% of The Wj Jones Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in OK; by stated purpose, 8%.

The Wj Jones Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 11 repeat orgs$195k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
1

Total granted

$1.3M
$20k

Still filing today

64%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $175k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION AT SAINT FRANCIS
    5× · 2020–2024 · $320k · revenue +16%
  • CITIZENS CARING FOR CHILDREN
    6× · 2020–2025 · $225k · revenue +21%
  • PT
    POSITIVE TOMORROWS INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $185k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • MC
    MURRY COUNTY CHARITABLE ENDEAVORS
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Parent Child Ctr of Tulsa Inc

To prevent child abuse and neglect through education, treatment, and advocacy. the parent child center of tulsa (pcct) has been serving the tulsa community and surrounding areas since 1990. in 2024, pcct served more than 96,000 infants,…

—
2
Peaceful Family Solutions Inc

Peaceful family solutions dba peaceful family oklahoma (pfo) offers free trauma-informed, age-appropriate, evidence-based, hope-centered programs through day camp and school-based models for children aged 4-18. a key component of the…

Human Services
3
Oklahoma Partnership for School Readiness Foundation Inc

To improve school readiness outcomes in oklahoma.

Education
4
Oklahoma City Family Justice Center Inc

The mission of the okcfjc is to provide protection, hope and healing to those impacted by domestic and family violence in the oklahoma city community. the organization provides a centrally located facility which co-locates and coordinates…

Crime & Legal
5
New Hope Oklahoma Inc

New hope teaches children of prisoners to become positive, productive, contributing members of society. we do this by providing after school programs, weekend retreats, holiday parties and summer camps to children who have or have had a…

Youth Development
6
Oklahoma Child Care Resource & Referral Association Inc

Our Mission is for all Oklahoma families to have access to quality care and education for their children through community-based resource and referral services; with a vision of Oklahoma communities supporting the development and learning…

—
7
The Children's Hospital Volunteers

Our mission is to improve the lives of children in oklahoma with support focused on the patients and families at the children's hospital. being a patient can be a scary, overwhelming, not-so-fun time--away from home, school, friends and…

—
8
Oklahoma Children & Youth Coalition

Oklahoma children and youth coalition, inc. was established in 2012 to create programs and projects for children, youth and their families and those who support them. we worect to mental health, social and intellectual development, and…

Health
9
Tulsa Advocates for the Protection of Children

To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.

Crime & Legal
10
Childrens Center

The mission of childrens center is to support and medically assess children who are suspected victims of abuse or neglect.

Crime & Legal
11
Okmulgee County Family Resource Ctr

Crisis intervention services and full shelter for victims and their children of domestic violence/sexual assault. Advocates for abused children in the court system.

Human Services
12
City Care Inc

City care inspires those willing to look social injustice and extreme proverty in the face, and empowers them to do whatever it takes to create change.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Positive Tomorrows Inc; the most unlike its peers is Diabetes Solution of Oklahoma. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION AT SAINT FRANCIS: $320,000 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION AT SAINT …TENACIOUSLY TEAL INCORPORATED: $143,000 · HealthTENACIOUSLY TEAL INCORPORATEDCHILDREN'S MEDICAL RESEARCH INC: $90,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S MEDICAL RESEARCH INCDIABETES SOLUTION OF OKLAHOMA: $25,000 · HealthCITIZENS CARING FOR CHILDREN: $225,000 · OtherCITIZENS CARING FOR CHILDRENTHE MEADOWS CENTER FOR: $55,000 · OtherTHE MEADOWS CENTER FORSALVATION ARMY: $50,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYIndividual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientA CHANCE TO CHANGE FOUNDATION: $35,000 · OtherA CHANCE TO CHANGE FOUNDATIONCOALITION OF OKLAHOMA: $28,500 · OtherCOALITION OF OKLAHOMAMURRY COUNTY CHARITABLE ENDEAVORS: $20,000 · Other+1 more: $10,000 · OtherCare Center-Child Abuse Response and Evaluation Inc DBA The CARE Center: $130,000 · Human ServicesCare Center-Chi…PIVOT INC: $75,000 · Human ServicesPIVOT INCPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC: $185,000 · Youth DevelopmentPOSITIVE TOMOR…REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $50,000 · Food & Nutrition
Health$578,000Other$463,500Human Services$205,000Youth Development$185,000Food & Nutrition$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION AT SAINT FRANCIS: $320,000 over 5y, 6.0% of budgetCITIZENS CARING FOR CHILDREN: $225,000 over 6y, 3.9% of budgetPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC: $185,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetTENACIOUSLY TEAL INCORPORATED: $143,000 over 5y, 8.0% of budgetCare Center-Child Abuse Response and Evaluation Inc DBA The CARE Center: $130,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S MEDICAL RESEARCH INC: $90,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetPIVOT INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA CHANCE TO CHANGE FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION AT SAINT FRANCIS ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENS CARING FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds POSITIVE TOMORROWS INC ↗
  • Who funds TENACIOUSLY TEAL INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Care Center-Child Abuse Response and Evaluation Inc DBA The CARE Center ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MEDICAL RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds PIVOT INC ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds A CHANCE TO CHANGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DIABETES SOLUTION OF OKLAHOMA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Harris Foundation IncOK17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Harris Foundation Inc · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Peyton Family Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Servant Foundation · Harry and Louise Brown Foundation · McLaughlin Family Foundation · Rainbolt Family Foundation · The Merrick Foundation · Kirkpatrick Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Wj Jones Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Wj Jones Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Pivot Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Wj Jones Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Wj Jones Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wj Jones Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph