Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Wilson J & Karen a Farmerie Charitable

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$72k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 62% of THE WILSON J & KAREN A FARMERIE CHARITABLE’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANGEL'S PLACE$20,000
SAINT VINCENT COLLEGE$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$10,000
BROTHER'S BROTHER FOUNDATION$5,000
CARNEGIE LIBRARY OF PITTSBURGH$5,000
TUNNELS TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$5,000
GLOCK FOUNDATION$5,000
GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$2,500
SOUTH HILLS INTERFAITH MOVEMENT$2,500
SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL$2,500
OPERATION WALK PITTSBURGH$2,000
STANDING IN THE GAP$1,500
RESURRECTION PARISH$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GUARDIAN ANGELS MEDICAL SERVICE DOGS: $5k → 16%GUARDIAN ANGELS MEDICAL SERVICE DOGS: $5k → 16%GUARDIAN ANGELS MEDICAL SERVICE DOGS: $5k → 16%GUARDIAN ANGELS MEDICAL SERVICE DOGS: $2k → 16%STANDING IN THE GAP: $3k → 11%STANDING IN THE GAP: $2k → 11%STANDING IN THE GAP: $2k → 11%STANDING IN THE GAP: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$595k · 19 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +78% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
7

Total granted

$595k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+25%

Still filing today

58%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesReligionFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AP
    Angels Place Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $190k · revenue +110%
  • SV
    SAINT VINCENT COLLEGE
    6× · 2019–2025 · $65k · revenue +19%
  • CL
    CARNEGIE LIBRARY OF PITTSBURGH
    9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • SV
    SAINT VINCENT'S SEMINARY
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • NF
    NORTHSIDE FOOD PANTRY
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Los Angelesgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +27%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

2
La Roche University

La roche university advances learning informed by ethical and service-oriented values, reflecting its catholic heritage and the charism of the sisters of divine providence.

Education
3
Alvernia University

Alvernia university is a catholic comprehensive university with a liberal arts foundation founded by the bernardine franciscan sisters in 1958. see continuation on schedule o.

4
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
5
The Pittsburgh Promise Foundation

The pittsburgh promise promotes high educational aspirations among urban youth, funds scholarships for post-secondary access, and fuels a prepared and diverse regional workforce.

Philanthropy
6
Pittsburgh Mercy Health System Inc

We, pittsburgh mercy health system (pittsburgh mercy) and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. pittsburgh mercy is a member of trinity…

Health
7
The Children's Institute of Pittsburgh

To heal. to teach. to empower. to amaze.

Education
8
Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh Foundation

Children's hospital of pittsburgh foundation is the sole fundraising arm of upmc children's hospital of pittsburgh.the foundation exists to provide financial support for the hospital's mission of improving the health and well-being of…

Health
9
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
10
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

11
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
12
Highmark Health Group

Working as an integrated system within highmark health, employees at all of ahn's care sites, including hospitals, health + wellness pavilions, primary and specialty care offices and more, are committed to improving health and promoting…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Pittsburgh and the most unlike its peers is Standing in the Gap. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
15/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Angels Place Inc — $190,000 · OtherAngels Place IncCHURCH ALIVE INCORPORATED — $40,000 · OtherCHURCH ALIVE INCORPORATEDUNIV PGH SWANSON ENGINEERING SCHOOL — $40,000 · OtherUNIV PGH SWANSON ENGINEERING SCHOOLTHE WOINER FOUNDATION — $35,000 · OtherTHE WOINER FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SWANSON SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING — $20,000 · OtherSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL OF PHILADE OF PHILADELPHIA — $17,500 · Other+11 more — $49,000 · Other+11 moreSAINT VINCENT COLLEGE — $65,000 · EducationSAINT VINCENT COLLEGECARNEGIE LIBRARY OF PITTSBURGH — $45,000 · EducationCARNEGIE LIBRARY OF PITTSB…UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $30,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGHSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $5,000 · EducationSOUTH HILLS INTERFAITH MINISTRIES — $30,000 · ReligionGUARDIAN ANGELS MEDICAL SERVICE DOGS INC — $17,000 · Human ServicesStanding In The Gap — $7,000 · Human ServicesGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $20,000 · Food & NutritionBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $7,500 · HealthAMD3 FOUNDATION — $4,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $2,500 · HealthBROTHER'S BROTHER FOUNDATION — $5,000 · International
Other$391,500Education$145,000Religion$30,000Human Services$24,000Food & Nutrition$20,000Health$14,000International$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAngels Place Inc — $190,000 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetSAINT VINCENT COLLEGE — $65,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCARNEGIE LIBRARY OF PITTSBURGH — $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WOINER FOUNDATION — $35,000 over 7y, 73% of budgetSOUTH HILLS INTERFAITH MINISTRIES — $30,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $20,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL OF PHILADE OF PHILADELPHIA — $17,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetGUARDIAN ANGELS MEDICAL SERVICE DOGS INC — $17,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetStanding In The Gap — $7,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetAMD3 FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAFE MOMENTUM PITTSBURGH — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBethel Park Football Boosters Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Angels Place Inc
  • Who funds SAINT VINCENT COLLEGE
  • Who funds CARNEGIE LIBRARY OF PITTSBURGH
  • Who funds THE WOINER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SOUTH HILLS INTERFAITH MINISTRIES
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
  • Who funds GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL OF PHILADE OF PHILADELPHIA
  • Who funds GUARDIAN ANGELS MEDICAL SERVICE DOGS INC
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds Standing In The Gap
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BROTHER'S BROTHER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AMD3 FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles
  • Who funds CAFE MOMENTUM PITTSBURGH
  • Who funds Bethel Park Football Boosters Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Centimark FoundationPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Centimark Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Wilson J & Karen a Farmerie Charitable funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph