Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Wilson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$118k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$42k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$467kHealth$141kRecreation & Sports$99kPhilanthropy$93kInternational$54kYouth Development$27kArts & Culture$23kPublic Safety & Disaster$19kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $66k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $52k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY$42,000
SKAGIT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
U GIVE - UTAH MEN'S GOLF$8,000
WASATCH ADAPTIVE SPORTS$6,000
BURLINGTON-EDISON HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION$5,000
RISING STAR OUTREACH$5,000
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$5,000
OLYMPUS DEV FOUNDATION-REFUGEE SCHOLARSHIP$5,000
THE OTHER SIDE ACADEMY$5,000
MISSION AT THE WEST JORDAN CARE CENTER$5,000
ACADEMY FOR CREATING ENTERPRISE$4,000
FOREVER YOUNG FOUNDATION$4,000
THE SHARING PLACE$2,500
JORDAN VALLEY SCHOOL$2,500
UNITED WE PLEDGE FOUNDATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ELIZABETH SMART FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%ELIZABETH SMART FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%ELIZABETH SMART FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%ELIZABETH SMART FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%ELIZABETH SMART FOUNDATION: $500 → 8%RISING STAR OUTREACH: $5k → 8%RISING STAR OUTREACH: $5k → 8%RISING STAR OUTREACH: $5k → 8%RISING STAR OUTREACH: $5k → 8%RISING STAR OUTREACH: $4k → 8%RISING STAR OUTREACH: $3k → 8%RISING STAR OUTREACH: $3k → 8%RISING STAR OUTREACH: $2k → 8%RISING STAR OUTREACH: $2k → 8%RESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of The Wilson Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 75% of the giving stays in UT; by stated purpose, 72%.

The Wilson Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.3% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$840k · 33 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +90% since the first grant, against +83% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
14

Total granted

$840k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+90%
+83%

Still filing today

45%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    Academy for Creating Enterprise
    9× · 2017–2025 · $41k · revenue +77%
  • RS
    Rising Star Outreach Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $33k · revenue +75%
  • FY
    FOREVER YOUNG FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN
    7× · 2019–2025 · $27k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • CA
    CHARITY ANYWHERE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • RS
    RISE SERVICES
    one grant, 2018 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Anti-Doping Agency

Preserve the integrity of competition, inspire true sport, protect the rights of u.s. athletes

Recreation & Sports
2
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
3
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
4
Girl Scouts of Utah

Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence and character who make the world a better place.

Youth Development
5
Exalt Youth

Exalt youth serves youth involved in the criminal justice system, moving them away from incarceration towards re-engagement with education and meaningful job opportunities. our students come from some of the most economically depressed…

Youth Development
6
100 Club of Arizona

To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.

—
7
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
8
Honnold Foundation

Funding solar energy solutions, building capacity, and amplifying local leadership for those experiencing the greatest impacts from climate change, economic instability, and social injustice.

Environment
9
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
10
Afe Foundation

We are committed to identifying the cause, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of amniotic fluid embolism and bring our information and resources to healthcare providers and impacted families through our education and support programs.We…

Health
11
Utah Foundation

Utah foundation's mission is to produce objective, thorough and well- reasoned research and analysis that promotes the effective use of public resources, a thriving economy, a well-prepared workforce and a high quality of life for utahns.…

Public Benefit
12
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America; the most unlike its peers is Five 12 Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
22/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY: $347,850 · OtherBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITYBURLINGTON-EDISON HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $33,000 · OtherMISSION AT THE WEST JORDAN CARE CENTER: $29,000 · OtherFOREVER YOUNG FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN: $27,000 · OtherOLYMPUS DEV FOUNDATION-REFUGEE SCHOLARSHIP: $26,550 · OtherLDS HUMANITARIAN FUND: $24,500 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $24,000 · Other+27 more: $201,550 · Other+27 moreTHE SKAGIT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $75,050 · PhilanthropyTHE SKAGIT…FIVE 12 FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyFIVE 12 FO…Academy for Creating Enterprise: $41,275 · InternationalMercury One Inc: $8,750 · InternationalRising Star Outreach Inc: $33,400 · Human ServicesElizabeth Smart Foundation: $5,600 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesTHE SHARING PLACE: $16,450 · HealthIMAGE REBORN INC: $2,500 · HealthHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $2,500 · HealthALZHEIMERS RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · HealthYOUTH DRIVING FOR VALUES: $15,200 · Recreation & SportsWashington Junior Golf Association: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsThe Other Side Academy: $17,500 · Crime & Legal
Other$713,450Philanthropy$85,050International$50,025Human Services$39,500Health$23,450Recreation & Sports$20,200Crime & Legal$17,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE SKAGIT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $75,050 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetAcademy for Creating Enterprise: $41,275 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetRising Star Outreach Inc: $33,400 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetFOREVER YOUNG FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN: $27,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $24,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Other Side Academy: $17,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHARING PLACE: $16,450 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetWASATCH ADAPTIVE SPORTS INC: $16,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetYOUTH DRIVING FOR VALUES: $15,200 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetESPECIALLY FOR ATHLETES INC: $12,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetFIVE 12 FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetMercury One Inc: $8,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetElizabeth Smart Foundation: $5,600 over 5y, 4.8% of budgetWashington Junior Golf Association: $5,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetOUR RESCUE: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIMAGE REBORN INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPASADO'S SAFE HAVEN: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE SKAGIT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Academy for Creating Enterprise ↗
  • Who funds Rising Star Outreach Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOREVER YOUNG FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds The Other Side Academy ↗
  • Who funds THE SHARING PLACE ↗
  • Who funds WASATCH ADAPTIVE SPORTS INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH DRIVING FOR VALUES ↗
  • Who funds ESPECIALLY FOR ATHLETES INC ↗
  • Who funds FIVE 12 FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Mercury One Inc ↗
  • Who funds Elizabeth Smart Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Washington Junior Golf Association ↗
  • Who funds OUR RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds IMAGE REBORN INC ↗
  • Who funds HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMERS RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sorenson Legacy FoundationUT19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Paul T Walton Jr Charitable Foundation dba PT Walton Jr Foundation · Crewe Endowment Foundation · Semnani Family Foundation · Beesley Family Foundation · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · University Impact · American Endowment Foundation · American Express Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Wilson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Wilson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Wilson Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Wilson Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wilson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph