· Private foundation
Paul T Walton Jr Charitable Foundation dba PT Walton Jr Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 66% of Paul T Walton Jr Charitable Foundation dba PT Walton Jr Foundation’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $12k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $149k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
- $250k+1 grant · $278k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Utah State University Bastian Agricultural Center | $277,500 |
| University of Utah | $100,000 |
| The Other Side Academy | $27,000 |
| Friends of Switchpoint Inc | $26,000 |
| Friends of the Children-Utah | $25,000 |
| Nature Conservancy | $20,000 |
| Fight Against Domestic Violence | $11,000 |
| Kayenta Arts Foundation | $10,000 |
| Sharing Place INC | $10,000 |
| Doug Coombs Foundation | $10,000 |
| Success in Education dba Ken Garff for Good | $10,000 |
| Salt Lake Arts Council Foundation | $5,000 |
| PTA Utah Congress dba Legacy Jr High PTA | $5,000 |
| Food for Education Foundation Inc | $1,000 |
| Rising Star Outreach Inc | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $121k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KAKAYENTA ARTS FOUNDATION4× · 2019–2025 · $595k · revenue +48%
- TSTETON SCIENCE SCHOOLS INC2× · 2021–2024 · $30k · revenue +33%
- CFCANYONLANDS FIELD INSTITUTE INC2× · 2022–2023 · $20k · revenue +28%
Funded once
- USUtah Sate University Bastian Agricultural Centerone grant, 2023 · $265k
- UOUniversity of Utah Endowed Scholarshipone grant, 2023 · $104k
- MFMalouf Foundationone grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue -74%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Bike utah is the statewide, nonprofit bicycle advocacy and education organization. our mission is to make utah a better place to ride, and we envision a utah where complete active transportation networks and thriving cycling culture…
We are utah's partner in philanthropy, pioneering innovation and collaboration to invest in our community today for a brighter tomorrow.
To inspire, challenge, and empower teen girls to climb high in all areas of life through transformational leadership programs.
Utah film center inspires and engages diverse audiences to initiate conversation and community building through curated film exhibition, educational programs, and artist support.
To foster the arts in all forms in order to create an aware, empowered, and connected community.
To provide urban residents the opportunity to participate in agriculture by removing the barriers to entry such as land access, time, location and finances; and inspire excitement through practical experience while fostering respect,…
Utah's promise (up) is committed to 100% of kids and families thriving. we unify leaders, partners, communities and systems to achieve that promise.
A nonprofit organization rooted in the wood river valley, idaho basecamp helps develop resilience, confidence, and connection in youth through adventure, exploration, and intentional play in the outdoors.
Independent school for research-based high school education
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Four Corners School of Outdoor Educ and the most unlike its peers is Wayne Brown Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 29% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KAYENTA ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds Malouf Foundation ↗
- Who funds TETON SCIENCE SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds The Other Side Academy ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF SWITCHPOINT INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - UTAH ↗
- Who funds CANYONLANDS FIELD INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds WASATCH ADAPTIVE SPORTS INC ↗
- Who funds ROOTS CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Fight Against Domestic Violence ↗
- Who funds KEN GARFF FOR GOOD ↗
- Who funds THE SHARING PLACE ↗
- Who funds Wayne Brown Institute ↗
- Who funds FOUR CORNERS SCHOOL OF OUTDOOR EDUC ↗
- Who funds Sundance Institute ↗
- Who funds YOUTH GARDEN PROJECT ↗
- Who funds UTAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Doug Coombs Foundation ↗
- Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN UTAH ↗
- Who funds SNOWBASIN SKI EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMON GROUND OUTDOOR ADVENTURES ↗
- Who funds ENTRADA INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds THE FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Kostopulos Dream Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE POLICY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds ESPECIALLY FOR ATHLETES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Pacificorp Foundation Aka Pacific Power Foundation Aka Rocky Mountain Power Foundati · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · Marriner S Eccles Foundation · The Miner Foundation · The Wilson Family Foundation · Wcf Foundation · Beesley Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Paul T Walton Jr Charitable Foundation dba PT Walton Jr Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.