Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Williams Family Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$121k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0184% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Philanthropy$5.9MArts & Culture$245kHealth$90kReligion$75kCommunity Improvement$66kInternational$55kEducation$35kHuman Services$28kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DETROIT OPERA$50,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
GLAM4GOOD FOUNDATION$20,000
HENRY FORD HEALTH$15,000
Individual grant recipient$9,200
ANGELS PLACE$7,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHILD SAFE MICHIGAN: $10k → 8%CHILD SAFE MICHIGAN: $5k → 8%ANGELS PLACE: $7k → 8%ANGELS PLACE: $3k → 8%ANGELS PLACE: $3k → 8%ANGELS PLACE: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

13%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$876k · 19 repeat orgs$5.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
14

Total granted

$876k
$5.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+10%

Still filing today

53%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DO
    DETROIT OPERA
    5× · 2020–2025 · $160k · revenue +23%
  • AA
    AMERICAN ACADEMY IN ROME
    2× · 2020–2021 · $55k · revenue +57%
  • HF
    HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM
    3× · 2020–2025 · $35k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • PG
    PLW GIVING FUND 40122170
    one grant, 2022 · $3.8M
  • RC
    RJ CHARITABLE DAF 4878306
    one grant, 2022 · $633k
  • RC
    RJ CHARITABLE DAF 487816
    one grant, 2022 · $633k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
2
The Greater Detroit Health Transition Company

Gdahc mission: together with our partners, we empower and improve the health and economic vitality of individuals, organizations and communities by catalyzing the power of collaboration. gdahc vision: healthy people. healthy community.…

3
Lyric Opera of Chicago

We believe in the life-changing, transformational, revelatory power of great art and opera. Lyric Opera of Chicago exists to provide a broad, deep, and relevant cultural service to the Chicago region and the nation, and to advance the…

Arts & Culture
4
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
5
Delta Dental Fund

Delta dental fund's mission is to improve the oral health of the public and to advance dental science and the dental profession through research and education.

6
Mymichigan Medical Center Midland

Creating healthy communities - together

Health
7
Trinity Health - Michigan

We, trinity health-michigan and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. trinity health-michigan is a member of trinity health.

Health
8
Mclaren Greater Lansing

Mclaren health care corporation, along with its subsidiaries, will be michigan's best value in healthcare as defined by quality outcomes and cost.

Health
9
Jewelers of America Inc

Jewelers of america, the most trusted and influential voice of the jewelry industry, empowers and unites its members through expert guidance and advocacy, driving excellence, integrity, and success in an ever-changing marketplace.

10
Henry Ford Health Genesys Hospital

As one of the nation's leading integrated health systems, it is the mission of henry ford health system, a related entity of the filing organization, to improve people's lives through the excellence of the science and art of health care…

Health
11
Auditorium Theatre of Roosevelt University Inc

The Auditorium Theatre of Roosevelt University ("The Auditorium"), an Illinois not-for-profit corporation, is committed to presenting the finest in international, cultural, community and educational programming to Chicago and to the…

Arts & Culture
12
Detroit Regional Chamber

The chamber is the voice for business and works to power the economy for southeast michigan through public policy, advocacy and leading regional economic development and talent initiatives.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Detroit Opera and the most unlike its peers is Designconnect. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PLW GIVING FUND 40122170 — $3,801,839 · OtherPLW GIVING FUND 40122170RJ CHARITABLE DAF 4878306 — $633,449 · OtherRJ CHARITABLE DAF 4878306RJ CHARITABLE DAF 487816 — $633,449 · OtherRJ CHARITABLE DAF 487816RJ CHARITABLE DAF 487822 — $633,449 · OtherRJ CHARITABLE DAF 487822+15 more — $642,910 · Other+15 moreDETROIT OPERA — $160,000 · Arts & CultureDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $28,667 · Arts & CultureTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS — $15,000 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK LIVE ARTS INC — $12,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $3,000 · Arts & CultureGlam4Good Foundation — $90,000 · PhilanthropyHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM — $35,000 · HealthSKY FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · HealthTRINITY HEALTH CORPORATION — $10,000 · HealthKIDS KICKING CANCER INC — $5,000 · HealthAMERICAN ACADEMY IN ROME — $55,000 · InternationalCHILD SAFE MICHIGAN — $15,000 · Human ServicesANGELS' PLACE — $13,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG LIFE — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOMMUNITY HOUSE FOUNDATION — $1,000 · Community Improvement
Other$6,345,096Arts & Culture$218,667Philanthropy$90,000Health$75,000International$55,000Human Services$28,000Youth Development$5,000Community Improvement$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDETROIT OPERA — $160,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetGlam4Good Foundation — $90,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY IN ROME — $55,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM — $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $28,667 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSKY FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetCHILD SAFE MICHIGAN — $15,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANGELS' PLACE — $13,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK LIVE ARTS INC — $12,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTRINITY HEALTH CORPORATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS KICKING CANCER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan — $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetDESIGNCONNECT — $3,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOUSE FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DETROIT OPERA
  • Who funds Glam4Good Foundation
  • Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY IN ROME
  • Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM
  • Who funds DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
  • Who funds SKY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CHILD SAFE MICHIGAN
  • Who funds THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS
  • Who funds ANGELS' PLACE
  • Who funds NEW YORK LIVE ARTS INC
  • Who funds TRINITY HEALTH CORPORATION
  • Who funds KIDS KICKING CANCER INC
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE
  • Who funds University of Michigan
  • Who funds DESIGNCONNECT
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HOUSE FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Edward C and Linda Dresner Levy FoundationVA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Edward C and Linda Dresner Levy Foundation · The Kresge Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Williams Family Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Williams Family Fund?

    Find your warmest path to The Williams Family Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph