Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Williams Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$690k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$7.2MHealth$2.6MHousing & Shelter$494kPhilanthropy$94kHuman Services$58kArts & Culture$50kScience & Tech$40kCrime & Legal$27kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $73k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $104k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $514k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF CO FOUNDATION$200,000
UNIVERSITY OF CO FOUNDATION$196,603
SCHOOL DISTRICT RE-3$117,100
SCHOOL DISTRICT RE-50$35,300
SCHOOL DISTRICT RE-2$28,975
RISING UP$15,000
SCHOOL DISTRICT RE-20$13,000
UNITED WAY OF MORGAN COUNTY$12,000
CENTER FOR HEALING TRUAMA &$7,000
HERITAGE FOUNDATION$5,000
SCOTTISH RITE FOUNDATION$5,000
SALK INSTITUTE$5,000
EDUCATION FOUNDATION SCHOLARSHIP$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
WEBB-WARING CENTER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%BABY BEAR HUGS: $7k → 13%BABY BEAR HUGS: $7k → 13%BABY BEAR HUGS: $7k → 13%BABY BEAR HUGS: $7k → 13%BABY BEAR HUGS: $6k → 13%MORGAN COUNTY FAMILY CENTER: $5k → 12%MORGAN COUNTY FAMILY CENTER: $5k → 12%MORGAN COUNTY FAMILY CENTER: $5k → 12%MORGAN COUNTY FAMILY CENTER: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11M · 28 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +167% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
7

Total granted

$11M
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+167%
0%

Still filing today

36%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationHousing & ShelterMembership BenefitCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2025 · $4.5M · revenue +79%
  • TU
    The United Way of Morgan County Colorado
    9× · 2017–2025 · $94k · revenue +778%
  • RU
    Rising Up
    8× · 2017–2025 · $94k · revenue +425%

Funded once

  • MS
    Morgan Strong Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
  • NC
    NE COLORADO HEALTH DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
  • CD
    CONVERGE DAY TREATMENT CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue -35%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Center for Healing Trauma and Attachment Inc

To provide mental health services in Morgan County, Colorado and Northeast Colorado.

Human Services
2
Colorado Healing Fund

Establish a secure way for the public to contribute to victims of mass tragedy and to assist local communities with the financial, emotional, and physical needs of victims of mass tragedies in Colorado

Public Safety & Disaster
3
Grief Center of Southwest Colorado

Grief support to those who have lost a loved one.

Health
4
One Morgan County

To foster relationships amoung diverse people and organizations to strengthen the well-being, safety, and cohesive nature of the community.

—
5
Rocky Mountain Behavioral Health Inc

The Organization provides developed, evidence-based prevention and treatment mental health program services focused on alcohol, substance abuse, and domestic violence related issues. The Organization also provides affordable and accessible…

—
6
Community Foundation Serving Southwest Colorado

To develop and increase charitable giving that connects donors to community needs in Southwest Colorado and to support the nonprofit sector through granting and educational opportunities.

Philanthropy
7
Pueblo Rape Crisis Services Inc

Juniper SoCO provides comprehensive healing resources to survivors of sexual assault / intimate partner violence, equipping the community to prevent future sexual violence, & fostering an organizational culture that prioritizes wellness…

Health
8
Homeward Pikes Peak

Homeward Pikes Peak empowers individuals and families to access stable housing, increase mental health, recovery, and economic stability.

Housing & Shelter
9
Colorado Press Association

Promote the general interest of daily, weekly, and monthly newspapers and online publications, improve editorials and business methods of daily and weekly newspapers, and advance those newspapers' usefulness and influence in the public…

—
10
Problem Gambling Coalition of Colorado

Increase awareness, advocate treatment and promote research and education on problem gambling

Health
11
Samaritan Counseling Center

Centus is a top-tier provider of behavioral health services, education, and programs in metro Denver. We take pride in integrating every client's questions and concerns about their physical, behavioral, an spiritual self. We are champions…

Health
12
Senior Homes of Colorado Foundation Inc

Provide affordable and attractive independent living housing for seniors in a neighborhood setting that encourages fellowship and cooperative activities

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rocky Mountain Public Media Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blessing Bike. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MCC FOUNDATION: $2,346,456 · OtherMCC FOUNDATIONSCHOOL DISTRICT RE-3: $1,684,000 · OtherSCHOOL DISTRICT RE-3SCHOOL DISTRICT RE-2: $534,351 · OtherSCHOOL DISTRICT RE-2FMCHA: $404,300 · OtherFMCHASCHOOL DISTRICT RE-50: $352,946 · OtherSCHOOL DISTRICT RE-50+26 more: $487,395 · Other+26 moreUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $4,509,106 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATIONRising Up: $93,500 · Housing & ShelterRegional Home Visitation Program dba Baby Bear Hugs: $34,000 · Human ServicesMORGAN COUNTY FAMILY CENTER INC: $18,000 · Human ServicesSCOTTISH RITE FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $40,000 · Membership BenefitHOSPICE OF THE PLAINS INC: $24,000 · HealthSALUD FAMILY HEALTH: $5,000 · HealthSARA Inc: $26,500 · Crime & Legal
Other$5,809,448Education$4,509,106Housing & Shelter$93,500Human Services$52,000Membership Benefit$40,000Health$29,000Crime & Legal$26,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $4,509,106 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetThe United Way of Morgan County Colorado: $94,000 over 9y, 9.9% of budgetRising Up: $93,500 over 8y, 4.6% of budgetSCOTTISH RITE FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $40,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetRegional Home Visitation Program dba Baby Bear Hugs: $34,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetSARA Inc: $26,500 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE PLAINS INC: $24,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetMORGAN COUNTY FAMILY CENTER INC: $18,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMorgan Strong Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetSALUD FAMILY HEALTH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLESSING BIKE: $3,695 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetCONVERGE DAY TREATMENT CENTER: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The United Way of Morgan County Colorado ↗
  • Who funds Rising Up ↗
  • Who funds SCOTTISH RITE FOUNDATION OF COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds Regional Home Visitation Program dba Baby Bear Hugs ↗
  • Who funds SARA Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF THE PLAINS INC ↗
  • Who funds MORGAN COUNTY FAMILY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds Morgan Strong Inc ↗
  • Who funds SALUD FAMILY HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds BLESSING BIKE ↗
  • Who funds CONVERGE DAY TREATMENT CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Colorado Health FoundationCO17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Colorado Health Foundation · Bloedorn Foundation · Leprino Foods Company Foundation · Caring for Colorado Centennial Fund · Community Foundation of Northern Colorado · Anschutz Family Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Williams Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Williams Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Williams Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Williams Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Williams Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph