Skip to content

· Private foundation

The William Sadowsky Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$214kPublic Safety & Disaster$70kHuman Services$24kAnimals$20kEducation$17kReligion$6kCrime & Legal$5kEnvironment$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $21k
$500
Median grant
7
States reached
$781k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BAYSTATE HEALTH FOUNDATION$20,800
TOWN OF LONGMEADOW POLICE DEPARTMENT$5,000
MAKE A WISH$2,500
SAINT MICHAEL'S UKRAINIAN CHURCH$1,500
JGS LIFECARE INC$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
THE HUNDRED CLUB OF MA$1,000
OMAR COFFEE CHARITABLE TRUST$500
JEWISH FEDERATION OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS$500
Individual grant recipient$500
PAN MASS CHALLENGE$300
SAINTS PETER & PAUL UKRAINIAN CATHOLIC CHURCH$250
STONEHILL COLLEGE$250
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$250
DARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK HEALTH PROUTY$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $200) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LITTLE ANGELS SERVICE DOG: $100 → 11%COVENANT HOUSE: $100 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
KS
NC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$346k · 31 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
24

Total granted

$346k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+15%

Still filing today

45%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $450 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationAnimalsHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BH
    BAYSTATE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $136k · revenue +1%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $61k · revenue +162%
  • SC
    STONEHILL COLLEGE INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $12k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • TO
    TOWN OF LONGMEADOW POLICE
    one grant, 2017 · $11k
  • GH
    GRACEMED HEALTH CLINIC INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -18%
  • HO
    HOPE ON HAVEN HILL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +85%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mass General Brigham Health Plan Inc

Mass general brigham health plan's mission is to promote the health and wellness of our members, and to help ensure equitable, affordbale health care for the diverse communities we serve.

Health
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
4
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
5
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
6
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
7
Brighton Marine Inc

Brighton marine, inc. provides military and veteran families with comprehensive campus-based quality health care, as well as affordable and supportive housing for at-risk veterans and their families.

Health
8
Berkshire Health Systems Inc

The mission of berkshire health systems is to advance health & wellness for everyone in our community in a welcoming,inclusive & personalized environment.

Health
9
Mcphs University

Mcphs university prepares students for careers in health care through teaching, scholarship, research, professional service and community engagement.

Education
10
North Adams Regional Hospital

The mission of north adams regional hospital is to advance health & wellness for everyone in our community in a welcoming, inclusive, & personalized environment.

Health
11
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…

Health
12
Chelsea Jewish Nursing Home Inc

The organization's mission is to provide individuals throughout the greater boston area with the highest level of skilled nursing, rehabilitation and assisted living services without regard to ability to pay. the goal is to ensure both…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jgs Lifecare Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
22/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BAYSTATE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $135,666 · HealthBAYSTATE HEALTH FOUNDATION INCDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $60,658 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc+5 more: $13,875 · Health+5 moreTOWN OF LONGMEADOW POLICE DEPARTMENT: $33,182 · OtherTOWN OF LONGMEADOW POLICE DEPARTME…TOWN OF LONGMEADOW FIRE DEPARTMENT: $26,350 · OtherTOWN OF LONGMEADOW FIRE DEPARTMENTTOWN OF LONGMEADOW POLICE: $10,646 · OtherTOWN OF LONGMEADOW POLICEMAKE A WISH: $10,250 · OtherMAKE A WISHIndividual grant recipient: $4,500 · OtherTHE HUNDRED CLUB OF MASS INC: $4,000 · Other+35 more: $23,725 · Other+35 moreYANKEE GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE INC: $9,800 · AnimalsDAKIN PIONEER VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $9,600 · Animals+1 more: $250 · AnimalsSTONEHILL COLLEGE INC: $11,500 · EducationTHE OLIVERIAN SCHOOL INC: $1,600 · EducationSUFFIELD ACADEMY: $1,100 · Education+1 more: $200 · EducationSPRINGFIELD JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $11,450 · Recreation & SportsJEWISH FEDERATION OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyTHE DREW O'DONOGHUE FUND INC: $500 · PhilanthropyThe KU Endowment Charitable Gift Fund: $100 · PhilanthropyWEST SPRINGFIELD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $250 · Youth Development
Health$210,199Other$112,653Animals$19,650Education$14,400Recreation & Sports$11,450Philanthropy$1,600Youth Development$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBAYSTATE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $135,666 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $60,658 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSTONEHILL COLLEGE INC: $11,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSPRINGFIELD JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $11,450 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetYANKEE GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE INC: $9,800 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetDAKIN PIONEER VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $9,600 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetJGS LIFECARE CORPORATION: $5,775 over 8y, 27% of budgetGRACEMED HEALTH CLINIC INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUNDRED CLUB OF MASS INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE ON HAVEN HILL INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE OLIVERIAN SCHOOL INC: $1,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSUFFIELD ACADEMY: $1,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DREW O'DONOGHUE FUND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHAMPDEN COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION INC: $450 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetWEST SPRINGFIELD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JOYCE D & ANDREW J MANDELL GREATER HARTFORD JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBERKSHIRE HILLS MUSIC ACADEMY INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE ANGELS SERVICE DOGS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAPK CHARITIES CORPORATION: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BAYSTATE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds STONEHILL COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds SPRINGFIELD JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds YANKEE GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds DAKIN PIONEER VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds JGS LIFECARE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds GRACEMED HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HUNDRED CLUB OF MASS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE ON HAVEN HILL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE OLIVERIAN SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds SUFFIELD ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds THE DREW O'DONOGHUE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds HAMPDEN COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST SPRINGFIELD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Western MassachusettsMA13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Western Massachusetts · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The William Sadowsky Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The William Sadowsky Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Berkshire Hills Music Academy Inc: 63% of income from government
  • Springfield Jewish Community Center Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Baystate Health Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Stonehill College Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on William Sadowsky Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph