Skip to content

· Private foundation

The William S Deakyne Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$286k
Granted FY2025still arriving
40
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$410kHuman Services$313kHealth$271kEducation$259kPublic Safety & Disaster$225kRecreation & Sports$47kCivil Rights$29kFood & Nutrition$28kOther$0
02FY2025 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k29 grants · $99k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $187k
$5,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$786k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE ROYAL PRIDE FOUNDATION$25,500
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$25,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$25,000
UCSB - OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT UCSB$25,000
CARMELITE MONASTERY$16,000
FOCUS$15,000
SAN CARLOS CATHEDRAL$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
SAN CARLOS SCHOOL$10,000
DISCALCED HERMITS OF OL MT CARMEL$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
VIRGINIA ATHLETICS FOUNDATION$7,500
GOLETA$6,000
CITY OF HOPE$5,100
SAINT JOSEPH'S CHURCH$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GATHERING FOR WOMEN: $2k → 12%GATHERING FOR WOMEN: $2k → 12%GATHERING FOR WOMEN: $1k → 12%GATHERING FOR WOMEN: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
DC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 58 repeat orgs$74k to everyone else

58 repeat relationships: 38 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

58
16

Total granted

$1.9M
$48k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+67%

Still filing today

28%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesReligionInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GS
    GWENDOLYN STRONG FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $93k · revenue +51%
  • TD
    The Devereux Foundation
    7× · 2017–2023 · $70k · revenue +14%
  • VIRGINIA STUDENT AID FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $46k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • LA
    LITTLE ANGELS PRESCHOOL incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +67%
  • FW
    Franciscan Workers of Junipero Serragraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +54%
  • SC
    SAINT CASSIAN'S CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Francis Foundation of Santa Barbara

The mission of st. francis foundation of santa barbara is to promote and support health care.

Health
2
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
3
Scripps College

To educate women to develop their intellect and talents through active participation in a community of scholars, so that as graduates they may contribute to society through public and private lives of leadership, service, integrity and…

Education
4
Dominican University of California

Our institutional mission is to educate and prepare students to be ethical leaders and socially responsible global citizens who incorporate the dominican values of study, reflection, community and service into their lives.

Education
5
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
6
Birth Choice of San Marcos

Birth Choice is a Christ centered organization that provides compassionate, life-affirming care, empowering people to make educated decisions about sexual intimacy, pregnancy, and family.

Civil Rights
7
Westmont College

Higher Education: Westmont College is an undergraduate, residential, Christian, liberal arts community serving God's kingdom by cultivating thoughtful scholars, grateful servants and faithful leaders for global engagement with the academy,…

Education
8
California Baptist University

A private institution of higher education, offering both undergraduate and graduate courses to students.

Education
9
California Pacific Medical Center Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
10
San Diego Christian College

San Diego Christian College exists to educate and inspire students through the truth of scripture and the development of competencies that prepare graduates whose purpose is to impact the world.

Education
11
St Mary's Center for Women & Children Inc

St. Mary's Center for Women and Children (SMC), a multi-service organization supporting women, children, and families, believes shelter is not enough to erase the devastation of cyclical poverty and homelessness.Grounded in social justice,…

Unclassified
12
Mary's Shelter

Believing in the value of every life, mary's path empowers vulnerable teen mothers in foster care and their babies to create lives of dignity, hope and self-sufficiency.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is Gen Giammanco Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
17/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Catholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties: $225,000 · OtherCatholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside CountiesCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $225,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESSAN CARLOS CATHEDRAL: $120,000 · OtherSAN CARLOS CATHEDRALCARMELITE MONASTERY: $84,500 · OtherCARMELITE MONASTERYSAN CARLOS SCHOOL: $75,000 · OtherFELLOWSHIP OF CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY STUDENTS: $70,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $55,000 · Other+52 more: $707,446 · Other+52 moreGWENDOLYN STRONG FOUNDATION: $92,500 · HealthGWENDOLYN …The Devereux Foundation: $70,000 · HealthThe Devere…The Equine Healing Collaborative Inc: $15,000 · HealthThe Equine…+1 more: $1,000 · HealthVIRGINIA STUDENT AID FOUNDATION INC: $46,050 · EducationVIRGINIA …The Riviera Ridge School: $36,800 · EducationThe Rivie…SANTA CATALINA SCHOOL: $35,000 · EducationSANTA CAT…TRINITY COLLEGE: $27,500 · EducationTRINITY C…UCLA FOUNDATION: $6,500 · Education+2 more: $6,000 · EducationGATHERING FOR WOMEN - MONTEREY: $8,000 · Human ServicesFranciscan Workers of Junipero Serra: $5,000 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEELS OF THE MONTEREY PENINSULA INC: $7,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $6,500 · InternationalCARMEL MISSION FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 · Arts & CultureWORD ON FIRE CATHOLIC MINISTRIES: $2,500 · ReligionETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC: $1,000 · Religion
Other$1,562,446Health$178,500Education$157,850Human Services$13,000Food & Nutrition$7,000International$6,500Arts & Culture$3,500Religion$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCatholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties: $225,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetGWENDOLYN STRONG FOUNDATION: $92,500 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetThe Devereux Foundation: $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA STUDENT AID FOUNDATION INC: $46,050 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe Riviera Ridge School: $36,800 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA CATALINA SCHOOL: $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY COLLEGE: $27,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBIRTH CHOICE CENTERS INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetLife Choices Resource Center Inc: $25,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetBIRTH CHOICE OF THE DESERT: $16,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetThe Equine Healing Collaborative Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR MONTEREY COUNTY: $13,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGATHERING FOR WOMEN - MONTEREY: $8,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF THE MONTEREY PENINSULA INC: $7,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $6,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $6,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $5,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE ANGELS PRESCHOOL inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFranciscan Workers of Junipero Serra: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCARMEL MISSION FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWORD ON FIRE CATHOLIC MINISTRIES: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGen Giammanco Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCenter for Restorative Justice Works: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Catholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties ↗
  • Who funds GWENDOLYN STRONG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Devereux Foundation ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA STUDENT AID FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Riviera Ridge School ↗
  • Who funds SANTA CATALINA SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BIRTH CHOICE CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Life Choices Resource Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds BIRTH CHOICE OF THE DESERT ↗
  • Who funds The Equine Healing Collaborative Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR MONTEREY COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Monterey Peninsula FoundationCA17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Monterey Peninsula Foundation · Pebble Beach Company Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The William S Deakyne Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The William S Deakyne Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on William S Deakyne’s filings →

More from the funding graph