Skip to content

· Private foundation

The William Foss II Memorial Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$392k
Granted FY2024still arriving
28
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$105k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$122kPhilanthropy$107kHealth$43kHuman Services$39kYouth Development$34kReligion$33kRecreation & Sports$30kEducation$30kOther$0
02FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $65k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $127k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
$5,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRESCOTT COMM CUPBOARD FOOD BANK$105,000
FIDELITY CHARITABLE TRUST$95,000
BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF NW ARKANSAS$25,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS-ARKANSAS$25,000
WOUNDED WARRIORS PROGRAM - ARKANSAS$20,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOC$15,000
ST MARYS CHURCH$11,779
ACTS$10,000
CAN HOPE CANCER FOUNDATION$10,000
GOLDEN HARVEST FOOD BANK$10,000
DOMINICAN UNIVERSITY$7,000
CHILDRENS PLACE INTERNATIONAL$7,000
SOUTHWEST INDIAN FOUNDATION$6,000
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY$5,000
HELPING HANDS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HOSPICE OF THE EAST BAY: $500 → 9%HOSPICE OF THE EAST BAY: $500 → 9%CUMBEE CENTER: $5k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE EAST BAY: $500 → 9%HOSPICE OF THE EAST BAY: $500 → 9%CORNUCOPIA COMMUNITY ADVOCATES: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
IL
WI
NY
SD
OH
CA
VA
AZ
NM
AR
TN
SC
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$190k · 25 repeat orgs$271k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
11

Total granted

$190k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+20%

Still filing today

40%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $263k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS ARKANSAS INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $28k · revenue +346%
  • GH
    GOLDEN HARVEST FOOD BANK INC
    3× · 2020–2024 · $12k · revenue +32%
  • GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2019–2024 · $10k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • DC
    DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIXgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +63%
  • GA
    GIRLS AT WORK INC
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue -51%
  • AA
    ARCHBISHOPS ANNUAL APPEAL
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
Jewelers of America Inc

Jewelers of america, the most trusted and influential voice of the jewelry industry, empowers and unites its members through expert guidance and advocacy, driving excellence, integrity, and success in an ever-changing marketplace.

—
3
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
4
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
5
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
6
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
7
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
8
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
9
National Association of Corporate Directors

We empower directors and transform boards to be future ready.

Public Benefit
10
Lodestar Charitable Foundation

To perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes of the arizona community foundation, an az nonprofit corporation, so long as the arizona community foundation, inc. remains a qualified organization.

—
11
Chief Executives for Corporate Purpose Inc

Chief executives for corporate purpose (cecp) is the only business counsel and network dedicated to driving measurable returns on purpose. we promote responsible purpose-driven business as it increases customer loyalty, builds employee…

Philanthropy
12
Aacsb International - the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business

Aacsb international provides quality assurance of business school programs, the latest in business education intelligence, thought leadership, and learning and development services.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arizona Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Reading Is Fundamental Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
14/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIDELITY CHARITABLE TRUST: $95,000 · OtherFIDELITY CHARITABLE TRUSTBOYS GIRLS CLUB OF NW ARKANSAS: $29,000 · OtherBOYS GIRLS CLUB OF NW ARKANSASSPECIAL OLYMPICS ARKANSAS INC: $28,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS ARKANSAS INCWOUNDED WARRIORS PROGRAM - ARKANSAS: $23,000 · OtherWOUNDED WARRIORS PROGRAM - ARKANSASST MARYS CHURCH: $16,329 · OtherST MARYS CHURCHALZHEIMERS ASSOC: $16,000 · OtherACTS: $11,000 · Other+34 more: $87,632 · Other+34 morePRESCOTT COMMUNITY CUPBOARD FOOD BANK INC: $105,000 · Food & NutritionPRESCOTT COMMUNITY CUPBOARD …GOLDEN HARVEST FOOD BANK INC: $11,500 · Food & NutritionGOLDEN HARVEST FOOD BANK INCGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $9,500 · EducationDOMINICAN UNIVERSITY: $3,000 · Education+1 more: $48 · EducationST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 · HealthAIKEN WOMENS HEART BOARD: $3,000 · HealthCreative Growth Art Center: $1,600 · HealthCUMBEE CENTER TO ASSIST ABUSED PERSONS INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesEAST BAY INTEGRATED CARE INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesCORNUCOPIA COMMUNITY ADVOCATES: $500 · Human ServicesMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,200 · PhilanthropyAIKEN CIVIC ORCHESTRA: $3,000 · Arts & CultureKQED INC: $1,200 · Arts & Culture
Other$305,961Food & Nutrition$116,500Education$12,548Health$9,600Human Services$7,500Philanthropy$6,200Arts & Culture$4,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPRESCOTT COMMUNITY CUPBOARD FOOD BANK INC: $105,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS ARKANSAS INC: $28,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetGOLDEN HARVEST FOOD BANK INC: $11,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $9,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCUMBEE CENTER TO ASSIST ABUSED PERSONS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAIKEN CIVIC ORCHESTRA: $3,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetDOMINICAN UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAIKEN WOMENS HEART BOARD: $3,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetThe Launch Pad Teen Center: $2,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEAST BAY INTEGRATED CARE INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCreative Growth Art Center: $1,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYavapai Exceptional Industries: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS AT WORK INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $1,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION FOR COMPASSION & JUSTICE: $800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCORNUCOPIA COMMUNITY ADVOCATES: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $52 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREADING IS FUNDAMENTAL INC: $48 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PRESCOTT COMMUNITY CUPBOARD FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS ARKANSAS INC ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN HARVEST FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CUMBEE CENTER TO ASSIST ABUSED PERSONS INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds AIKEN CIVIC ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds DOMINICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds AIKEN WOMENS HEART BOARD ↗
  • Who funds The Launch Pad Teen Center ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗
  • Who funds EAST BAY INTEGRATED CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds Creative Growth Art Center ↗
  • Who funds Yavapai Exceptional Industries ↗
  • Who funds DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS AT WORK INC ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ16× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · St Mary's Food Bank Alliance · American Endowment Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The William Foss II Memorial Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The William Foss II Memorial Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on William Foss II Memorial’s filings →

    More from the funding graph