· Private foundation
The William E Barth Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HEALING PLACE | $3,000 |
| HOME OF THE INNOCENTS | $3,000 |
| LIGHTHOUSE PROMISE | $3,000 |
| LEGAL AID SOCIETY | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE | $2,500 |
| VISUALLY IMPAIRED PRESCHOOL | $2,500 |
| KIDS CENTER FOR PEDIATRIC THERAPIES | $2,000 |
| LOUISVILLE BALLET | $2,000 |
| WEST END SCHOOL | $2,000 |
| HILDEGARD HOUSE | $1,000 |
| KENTUCKY SCIENCE CENTER | $1,000 |
| LIFEHOUSE MATERNITY HOME | $1,000 |
| CASA | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 15% of The William E Barth Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in KY; read by stated purpose it is 85% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- THTHE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INC2× · 2024–2025 · $4k · revenue +70%
- VIVISUALLY IMPARIED PRESCHOOL SERVICES INC2× · 2024–2025 · $4k · revenue +12%
- KDKENTUCKY DANCE COUNCIL INC DBA LOUISVILLE BALLET2× · 2024–2025 · $3k · revenue +11%
Funded once
- LCLOUISVILLE COLLEGIATE SCHOOLgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue +66%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $2k
- SASHIVELY AREA MINISTRIESone grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue +1%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
As an active partner, leader and catalyst, we will assist african americans, other minority groups and the disadvantaged attain social and economic equality and stability through direct services and advocacy.
Thrive by 5 louisville is making early learning a top priority for louisville, breaking down barriers for the future of our children and city.
To empower individuals with disabilities and their families to lead fulfilled and productive lives. harbor house empowers individuals through employment, education, and community building opportunities.
To provide children with hope, understanding, and compassion so they can reach their full potential.
To meet the special needs of each child and family served in order to help improve their quality of life. the board of trustees and staff members of the home are committed to bringing the highest quality resources available to the…
To provide services and facilities for people whose capabilities and needs vary widely. lcc strives to make the lives of people more independent, healthful, meaningful and secure through development of innovative programs delivered with…
To improve the quality of life for all kentuckians through research, education and advocacy on important policy issues facing the commonwealth.
Provides community service(family counseling & day care) to the inner of louisville.
Enroll indy helps families choose schools that meet their children's needs by providing a one-stop enrollment process, school information that is relevant and easy to understand, and data to inform school improvement in indianapolis,…
Day spring provides a path forward for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities through services that cultivate hope, belonging, and community.we envision every person being valued and having a path forward regardless of…
We ignite the child's innate love of learning in a diverse and nurturing community by integrating authentic montessori philosophy with contemporary research-based educational methods. we empower each individual to make knowledgeable,…
Our mission is to break the cycle of addiction and trauma for women, children, and families.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St John Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Green Hill Therapy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LEGAL AID SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds LIGHTHOUSE PROMISE INC ↗
- Who funds THE HEALING PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INC ↗
- Who funds VISUALLY IMPARIED PRESCHOOL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds KENTUCKY DANCE COUNCIL INC DBA LOUISVILLE BALLET ↗
- Who funds LOUISVILLE COLLEGIATE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds West End School Inc ↗
- Who funds Cerebral Palsy KIDS Center Inc ↗
- Who funds CASA OF THE RIVER REGION ↗
- Who funds SHIVELY AREA MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Hildegard House Incorporated ↗
- Who funds ST JOHN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HISTORIC LOCUST GROVE INC ↗
- Who funds 21ST CENTURY PARKS INC ↗
- Who funds THE KENTUCKY SCIENCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds EDUCATIONAL JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds NATIVITY ACADEMY AT SAINT BONIFACE ↗
- Who funds CEDAR LAKE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WORKWELL INDUSTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Green Hill Therapy Inc ↗
- Who funds WATERFRONT BOTANICAL GARDENS INC ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL OF LOUISVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICANA COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Gheens Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · Cralle Foundation Inc · Snowy Owl Foundation Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · Wood & Marie Hannah Foundation · V V Cooke Foundation Corporation · LG&E and Ku Foundation Inc · Kosair Charities Committee Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The William E Barth Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The William E Barth Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The William E Barth Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.