Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The William Bingham Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$3.2MEnvironment$1.6MEducation$1.2MHealth$880kHuman Services$425kInternational$208kYouth Development$185kRecreation & Sports$160kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $110k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $750k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$100,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Stella Maris Inc$250,000
Chandler School$150,000
Hawken School$150,000
Southern Environmental Law Center$100,000
West End House Camp$100,000
Friends of Recovery NE Ohio$100,000
Washington School for Girls$100,000
Case Western Reserve University$50,000
CityMusic Cleveland$45,000
Apollo's Fire Baroque$30,000
Heights Arts$25,000
Musical Upcoming Stars in the Classics$10,000
The Haven Home$5,000
Museums of the Bethel Historical Society$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $682k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 70% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Wings for Kids: $50k → 12%Looking Upwards Inc: $30k → 7%Chagrin River Watershed Partners: $40k → 9%Earth Sangha: $50k → 6%Chagrin River Watershed Partners: $35k → 9%Earth Sangha: $50k → 6%Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Washington: $55k → 14%Edna House for Women The: $70k → 17%Edna House for Women: $35k → 17%Seeds of Literacy: $30k → 17%Mary Mavec Opportunity School of Euclid: $7k → 17%Mary Mavec Opportunity School of Euclid Inc: $5k → 17%May Dugan Center: $100k → 17%University Settlement: $125k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
NY
OH
PA
CT
RI
CA
VA
MD
NC
SC
DC
HI
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 11% of The William Bingham Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 63% of the giving stays in OH; read by stated purpose it is 60% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The William Bingham Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.1M · 24 repeat orgs$3.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
55

Total granted

$5.1M
$2.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+22%

Still filing today

96%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $523k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesHealthEnvironmentInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    The Musical Arts Association
    5× · 2017–2023 · $1.9M · revenue +45%
  • CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2017–2022 · $575k · revenue +53%
  • SM
    STELLA MARIS INC
    2× · 2021–2025 · $300k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • NF
    Northern Forest Center Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $250k · revenue +20%
  • US
    UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT INC
    one grant, 2024 · $125k · revenue -53%
  • HK
    HALAU KE'ALAOKAMAILEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +535% · 41% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cleveland Museum of Art

The mission of the cleveland museum of art (cma) is to fulfill its dual roles as one of the world's most distinguished comprehensive art museums and as one of northeastern ohio's principal civic and cultural institutions. the museum,…

Arts & Culture
2
Cleveland Institute of Music

The cleveland institute of music's mission is to empower the world's most talented classical music students to fulfill their dreams and potential.

Education
3
Manhattan School of Music

Manhattan school of music is deeply committed to excellence in education, performance, and creative activity; to the humanity of the school's environment; and to the cultural enrichment of the larger community. a premiere international…

Arts & Culture
4
The Central European University

Ceu is committed to promoting the values of open society and self-reflective critical thinking. it aims at excellence in the mastery of established knowledge, courage to pursue the creation of new knowledge in the humanities, the social…

International
5
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
6
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
7
West Creek Conservancy

Our mission is to enrich the lives of all people in northeast ohio by conserving natural habitats, restoring the ecological value of our region's lands and waters, and expanding opportunities to connect people from all cultures to…

Environment
8
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
9
The Cleveland Music School Settlement

To welcome all to our music and arts community to learn, create, celebrate and heal.

Arts & Culture
10
Cincinnati Museum Center

Cincinnati museum center inspires people of all ages to learn more about our world through science, regional history, and educational, engaging and meaningful experiences.

Arts & Culture
11
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
12
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Cleveland Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Earth Sangha. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAddiction Recovery ServicesCommunity FoundationsIndependent K-12 SchoolsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Local History MuseumsElementary Literacy TutoringHealth Access Advocacy and …Faith-Based Social ServicesDomestic Violence ServicesDevelopmental Disabilities …Equine Therapy ProgramsEnvironmental Conservation …Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr12%3%5–10yr21%11%10–20yr14%27%20–35yr16%19%35–55yr20%41%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr12%2%5–10yr21%4%10–20yr14%16%20–35yr16%11%35–55yr20%66%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/69
the rest of the field
11%
8,037/74,237

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

69 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 69 of the 90 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
67/69
Grantees still filing
51/69
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

The Musical Arts Association — $1,900,000 · Arts & CultureThe Musical Arts AssociationCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY — $250,000 · Arts & CultureCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORYLAKEVIEW CEMETERY FOUNDATION — $156,975 · Arts & CultureLAKEVIEW CEMETERY FOUNDATIONCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF SONOMA COUNTY — $140,000 · Arts & CultureCITYMUSIC CLEVELAND INC — $130,000 · Arts & Culture+9 more — $275,000 · Arts & Culture+9 moreTHE CHANDLER SCHOOL — $200,000 · OtherTHE CHANDLER SCHOOLTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $150,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYFIELDSTONE FARM THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER — $120,000 · OtherFIELDSTONE FARM THERAPEUTIC …SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER — $100,000 · OtherHALAU KE'ALAOKAMAILE — $100,000 · OtherWest End House Camp — $100,000 · OtherTHE NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY OF MARYLAND INC — $75,000 · OtherCentersCircle Health — $75,000 · OtherFriends of Recovery NE Ohio — $130,000 · OtherFriends of Recovery NE OhioTWO FOUNDATION INC TWO CAFE & BOUTIQUE — $105,000 · Other+34 more — $915,500 · Other+34 moreNorthern Forest Center Inc — $250,000 · EducationNorthern Forest…CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $150,000 · EducationCASE WESTERN RE…HAWKEN SCHOOL — $150,000 · EducationHAWKEN SCHOOLDENISON UNIVERSITY — $150,000 · EducationDENISON UNIVERS…ITHACA COLLEGE — $100,000 · EducationITHACA COLLEGEWASHINGTON SCHOOL FOR GIRLS — $100,000 · EducationWASHINGTON SCHO…HATHAWAY BROWN SCHOOL — $75,000 · EducationHATHAWAY BROWN …THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA — $60,000 · EducationEDWINS LEADERSHIP & RESTAURANT INSTITUTE — $50,000 · Education+2 more — $72,000 · Education+2 moreCHAGRIN RIVER WATERSHED PARTNERS INC — $135,000 · Human ServicesCHAGRIN RI…UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT INC — $125,000 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY…EDNA HOUSE FOR WOMEN INC — $105,000 · Human ServicesEDNA HOUSE…Near Westside MultiService Corp — $100,000 · Human ServicesNear Wests…Earth Sangha — $100,000 · Human ServicesEarth Sang…CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON — $54,819 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC C…WINGS FOR KIDS — $50,000 · Human ServicesWINGS FOR …LOOKING UPWARDS INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesSEEDS OF LITERACY — $30,000 · Human Services+1 more — $12,600 · Human ServicesCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC — $575,000 · EnvironmentCHESAPEAK…NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $50,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL R…WESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY — $50,000 · EnvironmentWESTERN R…Coastal Maine Botanical Gardens Inc — $35,000 · EnvironmentSTELLA MARIS INC — $300,000 · HealthBELLEFAIRE JEWISH CHILDREN'S BUREAU — $75,000 · HealthTHE METROHEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · HealthHOPEWELL — $40,000 · HealthCLEVELAND RAPE CRISIS CENTER — $25,000 · HealthAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $125,000 · InternationalWORLD LEARNING INC — $82,925 · International
Arts & Culture$2,851,975Other$2,070,500Education$1,157,000Human Services$742,419Environment$710,000Health$490,000International$207,925

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Musical Arts Association — $1,900,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC — $575,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetSTELLA MARIS INC — $300,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetNorthern Forest Center Inc — $250,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY — $250,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CHANDLER SCHOOL — $200,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetLAKEVIEW CEMETERY FOUNDATION — $156,975 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHAWKEN SCHOOL — $150,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDENISON UNIVERSITY — $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF SONOMA COUNTY — $140,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetCHAGRIN RIVER WATERSHED PARTNERS INC — $135,000 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetCITYMUSIC CLEVELAND INC — $130,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetFriends of Recovery NE Ohio — $130,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetUNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT INC — $125,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $125,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFIELDSTONE FARM THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER — $120,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetEDNA HOUSE FOR WOMEN INC — $105,000 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetTWO FOUNDATION INC TWO CAFE & BOUTIQUE — $105,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHALAU KE'ALAOKAMAILE — $100,000 over 1y, 41% of budgetNear Westside MultiService Corp — $100,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetITHACA COLLEGE — $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEarth Sangha — $100,000 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetWORLD LEARNING INC — $82,925 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY OF MARYLAND INC — $75,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetHATHAWAY BROWN SCHOOL — $75,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBELLEFAIRE JEWISH CHILDREN'S BUREAU — $75,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA — $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOld Westbury Gardens Inc — $60,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON — $54,819 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE METROHEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPIANO INTERNATIONAL ASSOC OF NORTHERN OH — $50,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetMALACHI HOUSE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetWINGS FOR KIDS — $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEDWINS LEADERSHIP & RESTAURANT INSTITUTE — $50,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetDREAMING OUT LOUD INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetHOPEWELL — $40,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCLEVELAND BALLET — $40,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTUESDAY MUSICAL ASSOCIATION — $40,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetPOETS HOUSE INC — $40,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY PREPARATORY SCHOOL — $37,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCLEVELAND KIDS' BOOK BANK — $35,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetLOOKING UPWARDS INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGreater Cleveland Neighborhood Centers — $30,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cleveland FoundationOH44.4× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · The Char and Chuck Fowler Family Foundation · The George Gund Foundation · Murphy Family Foundation · Higley Fund of the Cleveland Foundation · The Abington Foundation · The Lozick Family Foundation · Jewish Federation of Cleveland · Emma R Fox Char Trust Mut Fds · The Andrews Foundation · The Sk Wellman Foundation · The Reinberger Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The William Bingham Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • World Learning Inc39% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc2% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
29report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The William Bingham Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The William Bingham Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 90 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph