· Private foundation
Joyful Noise Charitable Foundation
TO ENGAGE IN AND CONDUCT CHARITABLE ACTIVITIES EXCLUSIVELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF, TO PERFORM THE FUNCTIONS OF, OR TO ASSIST IN CARRYING OUT THE CHARITABLE PURPOSES OF ANY PUBLIC CHARITY LOCATED IN MINNESOTA, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE DORSEY & WHITNEY FOUNDATION.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $10k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $107k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
- $250k+6 grants · $4.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| V3 SPORTS | $1,000,000 |
| WE CARE SOLAR | $1,000,000 |
| PROJECT SUCCESS | $900,000 |
| KINGSWOOD COLLEGE | $500,000 |
| ANGEL FOUNDATION | $300,000 |
| RHODES UNIVERSITY TRUST | $250,000 |
| RHODES UNIVERSITY TRUST | $100,000 |
| GREAT PLAINS FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| HOPE ACADEMY | $27,000 |
| WESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH | $25,000 |
| FAITH HOPE AND LOVE GLOBAL MINISTRIES | $25,000 |
| VNA & HOSPICE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INC | $10,000 |
| INDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST | $10,000 |
| VERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $2.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.3M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PSPROJECT SUCCESS2× · 2019–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +45%
- BMBlack Men Teach2× · 2021–2022 · $800k · revenue +162% · 40% of their budget
Teach for America Inc2× · 2022–2023 · $600k · revenue +20%
Funded once
- ANABBOTT NORTHWESTERN HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONone grant, 2018 · $1.0M · revenue -88%
- TITNTP INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $900k · revenue +63%
- MCMACPHAIL CENTER FOR MUSICone grant, 2020 · $650k · revenue -8%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.
To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.
The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…
United way of northeastern minnesota invests in nonprofits, programs, and collaborations that equip and empower, creating opportunities for people to thrive in our communities.
We believe that great schools are the cornerstone of a just and thriving community. ensuring that every child is able to attend a school that works is our moral and social imperative - our children deserve no less.
Move minnesota leads the movement for an equitable and sustainable transportation system that puts people first. we are passionate about connecting communities, ending the climate crisis, expanding access to jobs and resources, and…
Mity's mission is to inspire and challenge intellectually curious students to pursue their passions within a diverse, inclusive community and empower them by building skills and relationships for lifelong success.
Grow businesses, build wealth and increase reinvestement in the african communities of minnesota
To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…
Youthprise is a nonprofit intermediary that invests in the future of Minnesota by investing in youth. Youthprise's mission is to increase equity with and for Minnesota's indigenous, low-income, and racially diverse youth.
Breakthrough Twin Cities supports students on their journey to college by fostering a community of mutual learning with the next generation of educators so they both can collaborate, grow, and thrive.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Urban Ventures Leadership Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Great Plains Conservation Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE DORSEY & WHITNEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PLYMOUTH CHRISTIAN YOUTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds PROJECT SUCCESS ↗
- Who funds V3 SPORTS INC ↗
- Who funds ABBOTT NORTHWESTERN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WE CARE SOLAR ↗
- Who funds TNTP INC ↗
- Who funds Black Men Teach ↗
- Who funds Women's Foundation of Minnesota ↗
- Who funds The Cookie Cart ↗
- Who funds MACPHAIL CENTER FOR MUSIC ↗
- Who funds WOMENVENTURE ↗
- Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
- Who funds WALLIN EDUCATION PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds PRODEO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL #4213 ↗
- Who funds Think Small ↗
- Who funds READING PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds EVERY MEAL ↗
- Who funds MICROGRANTS ↗
- Who funds ANGEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Minneapolis Parks Foundation ↗
- Who funds LITERACY MATTERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YWCA OF MINNEAPOLIS ↗
- Who funds LINK Public School ↗
- Who funds Children's Theatre Company and School ↗
- Who funds PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC ↗
- Who funds URBAN VENTURES LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Livingston Healthcare Foundation ↗
- Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
- Who funds GENESYS WORKS GROUP RETURN DBA GENESYS WORKS ↗
- Who funds VOYAGEUR OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds AT HOME GROUP ↗
- Who funds ONEVILLAGE PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ENVISION COMMUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds GREAT PLAINS CONSERVATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOPE ACADEMY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Wem Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Mortenson Family Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · George Family Foundation · Fr Bigelow Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · The Sauer Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Joyful Noise Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- United Way of Indian River County Inc — 1% of income from government
- Indian River Land Trust Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Joyful Noise Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Joyful Noise Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.