Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Weiler Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$558k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$1.1MPhilanthropy$539kHuman Services$497kHealth$258kCrime & Legal$140kCommunity Improvement$77kArts & Culture$75kEmployment$73kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $77k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $460k
$20,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$9.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
POCONO MOUNTAINS UNITED WAY$110,000
HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY$100,000
BARRETT FRIENDLY LIBRARY$100,000
NORTHHAMPTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE$50,000
WORKSHOP FOR WARRIORS$50,000
POCONO FAMILY YMCA$50,000
THE JOEL FUND$25,000
COLLEGE HORIZONS$20,000
MORAVIAN ACADEMY$20,000
RIVERVIEW SCHOOL$11,500
EAST STROUDSBURG UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$6,000
FARMLINK PROJECT$5,000
EQUI-LIBRIUM INC$3,500
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MONROE COUNTY$2,500
NATURE CONSERVANCY$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $190k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 34% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%EQUI-LIBRIUM INC: $25k → 11%HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%EQUI-LIBRIUM INC: $4k → 11%THE JOEL FUND: $25k → 8%THE JOEL FUND: $25k → 8%THE JOEL FUND: $25k → 8%THE JOEL FUND: $25k → 8%THE JOEL FUND: $25k → 8%POCONO SERVICES FOR FAMILIES & CHILDREN: $35k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
OH
PA
CT
CA
VA
NM
TN
NC
HI
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.5M · 22 repeat orgs$446k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

22 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
22

Total granted

$2.5M
$407k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
0%

Still filing today

82%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $39k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyEnvironmentPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PM
    POCONO MOUNTAINS UNITED WAY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $410k · revenue +6%
  • HU
    HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2017–2025 · $320k · revenue +24%
  • NC
    NORTHAMPTON COUNTY AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2025 · $275k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • SL
    ST LUKE'S HOSPITAL OF BETHLEHEM PAgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +26%
  • MC
    MONROE COUNTY HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -55%
  • SF
    SLOVENSKA FUNDACIJA ZA UNICEF
    one grant, 2022 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Penn Highlands Healthcare Inc

Our community-based and controlled health care system exists to improve regional access to a wide array of premier primary care and advanced health services while supporting a reverence for life and the worth and dignity of each individual.

Health
2
Monongahela Valley Hospital Inc

The mission of penn highlands mon valley is to enhance the health of the residents of the mid-monongahela valley area by providing outstanding healthcare services.

Health
3
Pocono Health System

We heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value supported by education and clinical research.

4
Lehigh Valley Health Network

We heal, comfort, and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value supported by education and clinical research.

5
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
6
DuBois Regional Medical Center

To provide the patient with exceptional care through our community-based health system while maintaining a reverence for life. it's the vision of the system to be the integrated health system of choice through excellent quality, service…

Health
7
Foundation for Hackettstown Medical Center

To serve the philanthropic needs for the Hackettstown Medical Center.

8
Massachusetts Council of Community Hospitals Inc

Support the advocacy of community hospitals.

Health
9
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
10
North Shore Health System Medical Faculty Group Practice

North shore health system medical faculty group practice (the corporation) functions as an extension of the northwell health hospitals by bringing medical care to community settings, providing care to medicare, medicaid, and other…

Health
11
Jc Blair Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc

The foundation's mission continues to be to ensure quality health care for the people of huntingdon county by providing funds to support and enhance the delivery of services at j.c. blair memorial hospital, which is the only hospital in…

Health
12
Elk Regional Health Center

Elk regional health center d/b/a penn highlands elk will be the healthcare provider of choice for our communities through a commitment to service, quality, people, finance and growth.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pocono Mountains United Way and the most unlike its peers is Textless Live More Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyUnited Way FederationsYmca Community CentersVeteran Support ServicesPublic Library SupportCommunity Arts OrganizationsEarly Childhood Education C…Native Hawaiian Community D…Government Accountability R…Education Equity LeadershipFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Animal Rescue and AdoptionUrban Agriculture & Food Ac…Cancer Support OrganizationsChristian Missionary Organi…Public University Foundatio…Land Conservation Organizat…Community Health CentersIndependent K-8 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%3%<5yr13%6%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr17%22%20–35yr15%22%35–55yr17%31%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%4%<5yr13%1%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr17%7%20–35yr15%19%35–55yr17%54%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/40
the rest of the field
9%
7,128/78,122

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/36
Grantees still filing
19/36
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MORAVIAN ACADEMY — $180,000 · OtherMORAVIAN ACADEMYYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MONROE COUNTY — $150,000 · OtherYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MON…BARRETT FRIENDLY LIBRARY — $105,000 · OtherBARRETT FRIENDLY LIBRARYYMCA OF MONROE COUNTY — $75,000 · OtherYMCA OF MONROE COUNTYBARRETT TOWNSHIP — $74,885 · OtherBARRETT TOWNSHIPMONROE COUNTY HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION INC — $50,000 · OtherSLOVENSKA FUNDACIJA ZA UNICEF — $50,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY — $40,000 · OtherOCEAN REEF MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $40,000 · Other+21 more — $266,700 · Other+21 moreHOFSTRA UNIVERSITY — $320,000 · EducationHOFSTRA UNIVERSITYNORTHAMPTON COUNTY AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $275,000 · EducationNORTHAMPTON COUNTY AREA COMMUN…EAST STROUDSBURG UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $120,464 · EducationEAST STROUDSBURG UNIVERSITY FO…RAVENSCROFT SCHOOL — $50,000 · EducationRAVENSCROFT SCHOOL+2 more — $45,000 · Education+2 morePOCONO MOUNTAINS UNITED WAY — $410,000 · PhilanthropyPOCONO MOUNTAINS UNI…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MONROE COUNTY — $102,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION…HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $1,000 · PhilanthropyJOEL FUND — $125,000 · Human ServicesPOCONO SERVICES FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN INCORPORATED — $35,000 · Human ServicesEQUI-LIBRIUM INC — $28,500 · Human Services+2 more — $6,000 · Human ServicesPOCONO HEALTH FOUNDATION — $121,426 · HealthST LUKE'S HOSPITAL OF BETHLEHEM PA — $50,000 · HealthBaptist Health South Florida Foundation Inc — $10,000 · Health+1 more — $200 · HealthCHOOSING INTEGRITY — $140,000 · Crime & LegalWORKSHOPS FOR WARRIORS INC — $73,200 · Employment
Other$1,031,585Education$810,464Philanthropy$538,500Human Services$194,500Health$181,626Crime & Legal$140,000Employment$73,200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPOCONO MOUNTAINS UNITED WAY — $410,000 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetHOFSTRA UNIVERSITY — $320,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHAMPTON COUNTY AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $275,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetMORAVIAN ACADEMY — $180,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MONROE COUNTY — $150,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetCHOOSING INTEGRITY — $140,000 over 4y, 83% of budgetJOEL FUND — $125,000 over 5y, 10% of budgetPOCONO HEALTH FOUNDATION — $121,426 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetEAST STROUDSBURG UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $120,464 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetBARRETT FRIENDLY LIBRARY — $105,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MONROE COUNTY — $102,500 over 2y, 47% of budgetWORKSHOPS FOR WARRIORS INC — $73,200 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetST LUKE'S HOSPITAL OF BETHLEHEM PA — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONROE COUNTY HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetRAVENSCROFT SCHOOL — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOCEAN REEF MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPOCONO SERVICES FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN INCORPORATED — $35,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetEQUI-LIBRIUM INC — $28,500 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetPOCONO ALLIANCE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SEMINAR NETWORK INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE HORIZONS INC — $20,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTHE FRIENDLY COMMUNITY CENTER — $13,000 over 3y, 5.4% of budgetThe Buck Hill Conservation Foundation — $11,500 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetORCAT INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetBaptist Health South Florida Foundation Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFARMLINK PROJECT — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEADERSHIP LACKAWANNA — $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetOCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRODHEADS WATERSHED ASSOCIATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOXHOWE ASSOCIATION OF BUCK HILL FALLS PA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALING THE CHILDREN NORTHEAST INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lester G Abeloff FoundationPA28.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lester G Abeloff Foundation · Essa Bank & Trust Foundation · Ppl Foundation · R Dale & Frances M Hughes Fdn 47f100011 · Mount Airy Foundation · The Ann and Joseph Farda Foundation · Moses Taylor Foundation Inc · Allone Charities · Todd and Shari Nelson Family Fdn Inc · United Way of the Greater Lehigh Valley · Lehigh Valley Community Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Weiler Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Weiler Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Weiler Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph