Skip to content
The Webb Impact Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Webb Impact Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$119k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$211kHealth$155kPhilanthropy$69kEducation$67kRecreation & Sports$61kYouth Development$57kReligion$51kAnimals$49kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $86k
$3,044
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
QUERENCIA FOUNDATION$25,000
MANEGAIT$20,000
Individual grant recipient$10,917
RAINN$10,325
PANCREATIC CANCER SOCIETY$10,257
AIM FOR MENTAL HEALTH$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,200
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,649
GWU HILLEL$3,044
HELLA SHRINERS$2,500
GIVE FUND ONLINE$2,180
DALLAS SHERIFF FOUNDATION$2,000
DALLAS FALLEN OFFICERS FOUNDATION$2,000
CAL FARLEY'S BOY'S RANCH$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $170k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CITY HOUSE: $4k → 5%DALLAS LEGACY MISSION INC: $3k → 5%OASIS CENTER: $1k → 5%MAINGAIT: $30k → 5%MANEGAIT: $29k → 5%MANEGAIT: $25k → 5%MAINGAIT: $23k → 5%MAINGAIT: $21k → 5%MANEGAIT: $20k → 5%MAIN GAIT: $14k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
SD
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
DE
KS
AR
TN
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$615k · 33 repeat orgs$478k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
79

Total granted

$615k
$436k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+24%

Still filing today

33%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsRecreation & SportsCrime & LegalPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MG
    Mane Gait
    7× · 2017–2024 · $162k · revenue +210%
  • AY
    AIM Youth Mental Health
    3× · 2020–2024 · $65k · revenue +113%
  • Rape Abuse & Incest National Network
    2× · 2023–2024 · $21k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • KP
    KALEIDOSCOPE PARK FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +58%
  • TG
    The George Washington Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $35k · revenue +26%
  • CO
    CITY OF BRUCE MS
    one grant, 2022 · $35k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.

—
2
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
3
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Greater Washongton Dc Inc

Ronald mcdonald house charities of greater washington, dc (rmhcdc) provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

Health
4
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Greater Charlotte Inc

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Greater Charlotte (RMHC of GC) provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare. Charlotte is recognized as a leading destination…

Human Services
5
Cook Children's Physician Network

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
6
Cook Children's Medical Center

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
7
Wi Cook Foundation Inc

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
8
Cook Children's Health Plan

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
9
Children's Hospital

Organization's mission to improve health outcomes for children; be a leader in creating innovative solutions to pediatric healthcare problems; and excel in care, advocacy, research. as the nation's children's hospital, the mission of…

Health
10
Cook Children's Medical Center - Prosper

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
11
Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health
12
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of North Texas; the most unlike its peers is Dallas Fallen Officer Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 119 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/45
Grantees still filing
35/45
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $38,901 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCITY OF BRUCE MS: $35,000 · OtherCITY OF BRUCE MSCITY HOUSE - PLANO TX: $35,000 · OtherCITY HOUSE - PLANO TXIndividual grant recipient: $30,917 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherDC DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES: $25,000 · OtherQUERENCIA FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Other+90 more: $413,027 · Other+90 moreMane Gait: $162,177 · Human ServicesMane Gait+4 more: $10,500 · Human Services+4 moreAIM Youth Mental Health: $65,000 · HealthAIM Youth Ment…MEDICAL CITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthMEDICAL CITY F…Rape Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN): $20,650 · HealthRape Abuse & I…THE MIRACLE FOUNDATION INC: $15,629 · HealthTHE MIRACLE FO…DRUG PREVENTION RESOURCES INC: $10,000 · HealthDRUG PREVENTIO…CHRISTUS GOOD SHEPHERD MEDICAL CENTER: $7,500 · Health+3 more: $390 · HealthKALEIDOSCOPE PARK FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsSPCA of Texas: $25,090 · AnimalsFARMHOUSE FRESH ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $10,000 · AnimalsSTRAYDOG INC: $4,275 · AnimalsThe George Washington University: $35,000 · EducationHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $15,635 · ReligionBOARD OF JEWISH EDUCATION INC: $10,000 · Religion
Other$632,845Human Services$172,677Health$144,169Recreation & Sports$51,000Animals$39,365Education$35,000Religion$25,635

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMane Gait: $162,177 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetAIM Youth Mental Health: $65,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetKALEIDOSCOPE PARK FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetThe George Washington University: $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPCA of Texas: $25,090 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMEDICAL CITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetRape Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN): $20,650 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters Of America: $19,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $15,635 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MIRACLE FOUNDATION INC: $15,629 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHUGH O'BRIAN YOUTH LEADERSHIP: $11,521 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBAJA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,160 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetDRUG PREVENTION RESOURCES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBOARD OF JEWISH EDUCATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetURBANPROMISE HONDURAS INC: $8,530 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetDALLAS JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,145 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $5,125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetB'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS INTERNATIONAL HELLA SHRINERS: $4,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSTRAYDOG INC: $4,275 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCITY HOUSE INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS LEGACY MISSION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S HEART FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOPH FUND INC: $1,090 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetILLINOIS CHRISTIAN HOME EDUCATORS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE OASIS CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRonald McDonald House of Dallas Inc: $809 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA INC: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER FOR NORTH TEXAS INC: $515 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WARREN CENTER INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMVETS NATIONAL SERVICE FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $220 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NORTH TEXAS: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Mane Gait ↗
  • Who funds AIM Youth Mental Health ↗
  • Who funds KALEIDOSCOPE PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The George Washington University ↗
  • Who funds SPCA of Texas ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL CITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Rape Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN) ↗
  • Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters Of America ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
  • Who funds THE MIRACLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HUGH O'BRIAN YOUTH LEADERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds BAJA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DRUG PREVENTION RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds BOARD OF JEWISH EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FARMHOUSE FRESH ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds URBANPROMISE HONDURAS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTUS GOOD SHEPHERD MEDICAL CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Texas Instruments Fou…Community Foundation …Communities Foundatio…The Dallas FoundationThe Rees-Jones Founda…United Way WorldwideThe Andrea-Mennen Fam…Hillcrest FoundationTexas Women's Foundat…McKesson Foundation I…Celanese FoundationEnterprise Holdings F…
Texas Instruments FoundationTX19.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Texas Instruments Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation · United Way Worldwide · The Andrea-Mennen Family Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · McKesson Foundation Inc · Celanese Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Webb Impact Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Webb Impact Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • Big Brothers Big Sisters of America: 21% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Webb Impact Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Webb Impact Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 119 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Webb Impact’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home