Skip to content

· Private foundation

The We Martin Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$200k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$96k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$420kFood & Nutrition$262kHuman Services$204kArts & Culture$198kHousing & Shelter$161kEnvironment$82kEducation$77kRecreation & Sports$57kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $72k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $96k
$7,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CRC OF ISABELLA COUNTY$96,000
COMMUNITY COMPASSION NETWORK$20,000
ISABELLA COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN$11,500
CRC OF ISABELLA COUNTY$10,500
RISE ADVOCACY$10,000
MT PLEASANT AREA COMM FOUNDATION$10,000
CHIPPEWA WATERSHED CONSERVANCY$10,000
CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY$7,500
ISBELLA COUNTY RESTORATIN HOUSE$5,000
MT PLEASANT DISCOVERY MUSEUM$5,000
UNITED WAY OF GREATER CENTRAL MICH$5,000
VETS WITH NETS$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
CENTRAL MI VETERAN'S FUND$2,500
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $5k → 11%CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $8k → 12%NORTHER LIGHTS YMCA - DELTA CENTER: $20k → 13%CRC OF ISABELLA COUNTY: $96k → 19%SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $5k → 11%CRC OF ISABELLA COUNTY: $81k → 19%CRC OF ISABELLA COUNTY: $35k → 19%COMMUNITY COMPASSION NETWORK: $20k → 19%COMMUNITY COMPASSION NETWORK: $20k → 19%COMMUNITY COMPASSION NETWORK: $20k → 19%COMMUNITY COMPASSION NETWORK: $20k → 19%COMMUNITY COMPASSION NETWORK: $18k → 19%ISABELLA COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION: $15k → 19%COMMUNITY COMPASSION NETWORK: $15k → 19%COMMUNITY COMPASSION NETWORK: $15k → 19%ISABELLA COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN: $12k → 19%ISABELLA COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN: $12k → 19%ISABELLA COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN: $12k → 19%CRC OF ISABELLA COUNTY: $11k → 19%CRC OF ISABELLA COUNTY: $11k → 19%CRC OF ISABELLA COUNTY: $11k → 19%CRC OF ISABELLA COUNTY: $11k → 19%ISABELLA COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN: $10k → 19%CRC OF ISABELLA COUNTY: $10k → 19%MT PLEASANT DISCOVERY MUSEUM: $10k → 19%CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $8k → 19%CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $8k → 19%MT PLEASANT DISCOVERY MUSEUM: $8k → 19%CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $8k → 19%CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $8k → 19%CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $8k → 19%MT PLEASANT DISCOVERY MUSEUM: $8k → 19%CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $8k → 19%MT PLEASANT DISCOVERY MUSEUM: $8k → 19%CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $8k → 19%CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $8k → 19%ISBELLA COUNTY RESTORATIN HOUSE: $6k → 19%ISBELLA COUNTY RESTORATIN HOUSE: $5k → 19%ISBELLA COUNTY RESTORATIN HOUSE: $5k → 19%MT PLEASANT DISCOVERY MUSEUM: $5k → 19%ISABELLA COUNTY RESTORATION HOUSE: $5k → 19%ISBELLA COUNTY RESTORATIN HOUSE: $5k → 19%CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $5k → 19%MT PLEASANT DISCOVERY MUSEUM: $5k → 19%MT PLEASANT DISCOVERY MUSEUM: $5k → 19%CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 19%CENTRAL MI VETERAN'S FUND: $3k → 19%COLORS FOR HEROES: $10k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 19 repeat orgs$174k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
6

Total granted

$1.1M
$169k

Still filing today

58%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionCrime & LegalArts & CultureHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    COMMUNITY COMPASSION NETWORK
    7× · 2019–2025 · $128k · revenue +85%
  • IC
    ISABELLA COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN
    7× · 2019–2025 · $124k · revenue +102%
  • CW
    CHIPPEWA WATERSHED CONSERVANCY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • CA
    CULTURAL AND RECREATIONAL COMMISSION OF ISABELLA
    one grant, 2019 · $112k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • IC
    ISABELLA COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Center of Accountability for Republicans

Social welfare and issue advocacy

Civil Rights
2
Severe Weather Network Livingston County

The Severe Weather Network (SWN) partners with community organizations, agencies, and faith communities to provide emergency, overnight refuge during the winter months for people experiencing homelessness in Livingston County. SWN also…

—
3
Mid Michigan Community Action Agency Inc

Mid michigan community action guides local residents on the path to self-sufficiency through empowerment, education and community enrichment.

—
4
Lapeer County Community Foundation

To provide grants to individuals and organizations of lapeer county for the purpose of enhancing the quality of life

Philanthropy
5
Michigan Legal Services

Provide free legal assistance to indigent and low income persons

Crime & Legal
6
Southwest Michigan Community Action Agency

Southwest michigan community action agency's purpose is to provide assistance to low income individuals in southwest michigan

Community Improvement
7
Catholic Charities West Michigan

Inspired by the church's social teachings, catholic charities west michigan fosters individuals and families to flourish by providing help and creating hope.

—
8
Midland County Food Assistance Network

To operate a network of food pantries to provide food to those in need.

—
9
Macomb County Veterans Food Bank

The mission is to provide food to needy and/or homeless veterans of macomb county michigan

Food & Nutrition
10
Midland's Open Door

Midland's Open Door (MOD) operates two crisis shelters, one for women and children and one for men. MOD's programs are designed to meet the immediate needs of homeless individuals by providing a safe and loving environment where each…

—
11
Midland County Council On Aging

Our mission is to promote and enrich quality of life for older adults and those who care for them by collaboratively providing meaningful services and opportunities.

Human Services
12
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ted Lindsay Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CRC OF ISABELLA COUNTY: $264,356 · OtherCRC OF ISABELLA COUNTYMT PLEASANT AREA COMM FOUNDATION: $189,659 · OtherMT PLEASANT AREA COMM FOUNDATIONISABELLA COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN: $124,000 · OtherISABELLA COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHENCULTURAL AND RECREATIONAL COMMISSION OF ISABELLA: $111,526 · OtherCULTURAL AND RECREATIONAL COMMISSION OF ISABELLACENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $76,500 · OtherCENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY+14 more: $145,500 · Other+14 moreMt Pleasant Area Community Fnd: $362,345 · PhilanthropyMt Pleasant Area Community…+1 more: $3,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY COMPASSION NETWORK: $128,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY…CHIPPEWA WATERSHED CONSERVANCY INC: $60,000 · EnvironmentWOMEN'S AID SERVICE INC: $55,000 · Crime & LegalMount Pleasant Discovery Museum: $47,500 · Arts & CultureCRISIS CENTER INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$911,541Philanthropy$365,345Food & Nutrition$128,000Environment$60,000Crime & Legal$55,000Arts & Culture$47,500Human Services$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMt Pleasant Area Community Fnd: $362,345 over 5y, 5.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY COMPASSION NETWORK: $128,000 over 7y, 5.5% of budgetISABELLA COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN: $124,000 over 7y, 9.0% of budgetCHIPPEWA WATERSHED CONSERVANCY INC: $60,000 over 6y, 6.4% of budgetWOMEN'S AID SERVICE INC: $55,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetMount Pleasant Discovery Museum: $47,500 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetCRISIS CENTER INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetISABELLA COUNTY RESTORATION HOUSE: $9,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTED LINDSAY FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetART REACH OF MID MICHIGAN: $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Mt Pleasant Area Community Fnd ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY COMPASSION NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds ISABELLA COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds CHIPPEWA WATERSHED CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S AID SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds Mount Pleasant Discovery Museum ↗
  • Who funds CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND ↗
  • Who funds ISABELLA COUNTY RESTORATION HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds TED LINDSAY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ART REACH OF MID MICHIGAN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater Central MichiganMI20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Central Michigan · Mt Pleasant Area Community Fnd · Dorsay · Fabiano Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The We Martin Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The We Martin Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The We Martin Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The We Martin Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on We Martin’s filings →

More from the funding graph