Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dorsay

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$145k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Recreation & Sports$743kArts & Culture$513kFood & Nutrition$435kEducation$130kCrime & Legal$125kInternational$65kYouth Development$60kHuman Services$60kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ISABELLA COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN$50,000
WINGS GUATEMALA$30,000
RESTAURANT CARE$20,000
WINGS$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
LAB SCHOOL FUND$5,000
RIVER SCHOOL$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
NEW SCHOOL WEST FUND$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NORTHERN MICHIGAN EQUINE THERAPY: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
MN
IL
MI
NY
CA
CO
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.8M · 14 repeat orgs$468k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +52% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
11

Total granted

$1.8M
$413k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+52%

Still filing today

50%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentInternationalMembership BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    ISABELLA COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN
    9× · 2017–2025 · $415k · revenue +253%
  • WJ
    Womens Justice Initiative Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $65k · revenue +111%
  • EV
    Eagle Village Inc
    5× · 2017–2022 · $50k · revenue +118%

Funded once

  • CA
    CULTURAL AND RECREATIONAL COMMISSIO
    one grant, 2024 · $158k
  • CR
    CULTURAL & RECREATIONAL COMMISSION
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • CM
    CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $65k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mid Michigan Community Action Agency Inc

Mid michigan community action guides local residents on the path to self-sufficiency through empowerment, education and community enrichment.

2
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
3
Midmichigan Health Services

To provide high quality community-oriented, patient-centered health services for all.

Health
4
Michigan Advocacy Program

To advance the safety, independence, and economic stability of those most affected by poverty, racism, and other structurally oppressive systems by increasing access to justice and working for systemic solutions.

Crime & Legal
5
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
6
Great Lakes Center for the Arts

The Center's mission is to inspire, entertain, educate, and serve all in Northern Michigan year-round by presenting exceptional experiences across the full spectrum of the performing arts and offering impactful educational opportunities.

Arts & Culture
7
Michigan Montessori Intenationale Inc

Children will discover their unique potential by living the Montessori lifestyle hand in hand with parents and staff.

Education
8
The Little Forks Conservancy Inc

To permanently protect and improve natural environments in Mid-Michigan by leading and inspiring actions that conserve vital habitats and waterways for the benefit of our entire community.

Environment
9
Maine Media College

Maine Media Workshops & College educates and inspires visual artists and storytellers to achieve their creative potential. We provide lifelong learning opportunities for those pursuing the fine arts and media-related professions. We are…

10
African Resource Center of West Michigan

The African Resource Center informs connects and equips African immigrants in West Michigan with people and resources to foster a flourishing community in which recent African immigrants can prosper emotionally economically and socially.

Human Services
11
The Women's Center

The mission of The Women's Center is to significantly improve the mental health and well-being of all members of our community through counseling, education, and support - regardless of ability to pay.

12
Lakeshore Legal Aid

Standing with our neighbors, Lakeshore Legal Aid fights poverty and injustice through advocacy and by providing meaningful and dignified access to the legal system.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Eagle Village Inc and the most unlike its peers is Isabella Community Soup Kitchen. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CULTURAL AND RECREATIONAL COMMISSION OF ISABELLA COUNTY — $613,457 · OtherCULTURAL AND RECREATIONAL COMMISSION OF ISABELLA COUNTYISABELLA COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN — $415,000 · OtherISABELLA COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHENCULTURAL AND RECREATIONAL COMMISSIO — $157,562 · OtherCULTURAL AND RECREATIONAL COMMISSIOCULTURAL & RECREATIONAL COMMISSION — $100,000 · OtherCULTURAL & RECREATIONAL COMMISSIONCENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY — $65,000 · OtherWINGS GUATEMALA — $65,000 · Other+18 more — $365,000 · Other+18 moreMount Pleasant Discovery Museum — $340,000 · Arts & CultureMount Pleasant Di…The Art Experience Inc — $15,000 · Arts & CultureWomens Justice Initiative Inc — $65,000 · EducationThe River School — $5,000 · EducationMt Pleasant Area Community Fnd — $50,000 · PhilanthropyPACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC — $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentWOMEN'S AID SERVICE INC — $25,000 · Crime & LegalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $10,000 · International
Other$1,781,019Arts & Culture$355,000Education$70,000Philanthropy$50,000Youth Development$40,000Crime & Legal$25,000International$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetISABELLA COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN — $415,000 over 9y, 15% of budgetMount Pleasant Discovery Museum — $340,000 over 7y, 16% of budgetWomens Justice Initiative Inc — $65,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetMt Pleasant Area Community Fnd — $50,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetEagle Village Inc — $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S AID SERVICE INC — $25,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetMID MICHIGAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetThe Art Experience Inc — $15,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN MICHIGAN EQUINE THERAPY — $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetThe River School — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ISABELLA COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN
  • Who funds Mount Pleasant Discovery Museum
  • Who funds Womens Justice Initiative Inc
  • Who funds Mt Pleasant Area Community Fnd
  • Who funds Eagle Village Inc
  • Who funds PACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC
  • Who funds WOMEN'S AID SERVICE INC
  • Who funds MID MICHIGAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds The Art Experience Inc
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds NORTHERN MICHIGAN EQUINE THERAPY
  • Who funds The River School
  • Who funds THE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The We Martin FoundationMI13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The We Martin Foundation · Mt Pleasant Area Community Fnd · Midland Area Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dorsay funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Pace Center for Girlsinc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph