· Private foundation
The Wct III and Jdt Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $6k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PHYSICIANS FOR PEACE | $10,000 |
| WOOD RIVER WOMEN'S FOUNDATION | $1,200 |
| THE SOCIETY OF THE FOUR ARTS | $1,000 |
| ST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER | $1,000 |
| ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| USSGA MEMORIAL FUND | $1,000 |
| LOCUST VALLEY FIRE DEPT | $200 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 67% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +210% since the first grant, against +196% for the ones you funded once.
19 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SLST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC6× · 2019–2024 · $20k · revenue +87%
- TGTHE GREEN-WOOD HISTORIC FUND INC2× · 2017–2018 · $11k · revenue +234%
- TSThe Society of the Four Arts Inc3× · 2017–2024 · $8k · revenue +720%
Funded once
- PNPB NAVY SEAL EVE OF TRIBUTEone grant, 2019 · $5k
Atlantic Salmon Federation (US) Incgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +196%- SSSUMMER SEARCHgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +56%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.
The Land Conservancy of Ridgefield, Inc. ("the Land Conservancy"), founded in 1967, preserves and protects, for the general benefit of the public, Ridgefield, Connecticut's natural resources including land and water resources, the plant…
See schedule onylcv is a non-partisan policy making and political action organization that works to make environmental protection a top priority with elected officials, decision-makers and the voters by evaluating incumbent performance and…
Alaska Whale Foundation is dedicated to marine mammal conservation through research monitoring and education.
We engage with communities to conserve, steward, and provide access to local lands and clean water for current and future generations to enjoy.
The norwalk seaport association, inc. offers a cultural, environmental, and historical journey to the norwalk islands. the sheffield island lighthouse and the light keeper's cottage provide a unique historical and educational venue which…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…
To educate the community as to the significance of their architectural and historic heritage through the preservation, protection, improvement, and restoration of sites and buildings in western new york that are of historic or civic…
To develop and promote the sport of surfing globally. the organization is recognized by the international olympic committee as the world governing authority for surfing, standup paddle (sup) surfing and racing, and all other wave riding…
Save the redwoods league protects and restores redwood forests and connects people with their peace and beauty so these wonders of the natural world flourish.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Glen Cove Boys & Girls Club At Lincoln House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sun Valley Fire Department. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Physicians For Peace ↗
- Who funds ST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE GREEN-WOOD HISTORIC FUND INC ↗
- Who funds The Society of the Four Arts Inc ↗
- Who funds Atlantic Salmon Federation (US) Inc ↗
- Who funds WOOD RIVER WOMEN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GREEN VALE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds SUMMER SEARCH ↗
- Who funds THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SUN VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
- Who funds USSGA MEMORIAL FUND INC ↗
- Who funds GLEN COVE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB AT LINCOLN HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds THE MONTANA LAND RELIANCE ↗
- Who funds NORTH SHORE WILDLIFE SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds THE NORTH SHORE LAND ALLIANCE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hugh and Patricia Okane Foundation Co Hugh Okane · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Wct III and Jdt Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.