Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Wagner Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$174k
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$462kHealth$333kFood & Nutrition$145kHuman Services$115kEducation$83kHousing & Shelter$68kInternational$65kArts & Culture$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k27 grants · $102k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $72k
$3,500
Median grant
11
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Jed Foundation$25,000
Active Minds$25,000
Glenbrook North High School$12,000
To Write Love on Her Arms$10,000
Fredericksburg SPCA$9,000
Greater Chicago Food Depository$8,000
Bounce Childrens Foundation$6,000
FORCE - Facing Hereditary Cancer Em$6,000
Rappahannock United Way$5,000
amfAR - Foundation for AIDS Researc$5,000
Fredericksburg Regional Food Bank$5,000
Ravinia Festival$5,000
Habitat for Humanity$5,000
StJude Children's Research Hospital$5,000
Youth Services of GlenviewNorthbroo$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $71k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 28% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%KEEP SWIMMING FOUNDATION: $5k → 5%SHELTER FOR HELP IN EMERGENCY: $5k → 8%KEEP SWIMMING FOUNDATION: $5k → 5%SHELTER FOR HELP IN EMERGENCY: $5k → 8%KEEP SWIMMING FOUNDATION: $5k → 5%SHELTER FOR HELP IN EMERGENCY: $5k → 8%KEEP SWIMMING FOUNDATION: $4k → 5%SHELTER FOR HELP IN EMERGENCY: $5k → 8%KEEP SWIMMING FOUNDATION: $3k → 5%SHELTER FOR HELP IN EMERGENCY: $5k → 8%SHELTER FOR HELP IN EMERGENCY: $4k → 8%ASPIRITECH: $110 → 8%Share Our Spare: $3k → 14%SHARE OUR SPARE: $3k → 14%Share Our Spare: $3k → 14%SHARE OUR SPARE: $2k → 14%Share Our Spare: $2k → 14%SHARE OUR SPARE: $1k → 14%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $2k → 14%Youth Services of GlenviewNorthbroo: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
IA
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
TN
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 52 repeat orgs$98k to everyone else

52 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

52
12

Total granted

$1.3M
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+82%

Still filing today

46%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $72k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyFood & NutritionAnimalsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    6× · 2017–2022 · $298k · revenue +13%
  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $114k · revenue +40%
  • GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $104k · revenue +140%

Funded once

  • KS
    Keep Swimming Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
  • LC
    LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS OF CHARLOTTESVILLE- ALBEMARLEgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +82%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
2
Global Down Syndrome Foundation

To significantly improve the lives of people with down syndrome through research, medical care, education and advocacy. an important part of this mission is to support the global affiliate organizations that we helped establish and…

Health
3
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
4
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
5
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
6
Sinai Health System

Sinai health system's mission is to improve the health of the individuals and communities it serves.

Health
7
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
8
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
9
Childfund Alliance

Childfund alliance is a global network of 11 child-focused development and humanitarian organizations working in more than 70 countries. we help nearly 30 million children and their families to overcome poverty and the underlying…

International
10
American Cancer Society Inc

Improve the lives of people with cancer and their families through advocacy, research, and patient support, to ensure everyone has an opportunity to prevent, detect, treat, and survive cancer.

Health
11
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
12
Lifeworks Services Inc

Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Illinois Inc; the most unlike its peers is Yash Gandhi Foundation for Finding a Cure for I-Cell. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/36
Grantees still filing
26/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Jewish United Fund JUF: $95,000 · OtherJewish United Fund JUFGLENBROOK NORTH HIGH SCHOOL: $46,500 · OtherGLENBROOK NORTH HIGH SCHOOLISMRD: $43,600 · OtherISMRDRAPPAHANNOCK UNITED WAY INC: $41,500 · OtherRAPPAHANNOCK UNITED WAY INCLURIE'S CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $37,500 · OtherLURIE'S CHILDRENS HOSPITALAMFAR THE FOUNDATION: $26,000 · OtherFREDRICKSBURG AREA FOOD BANK: $21,000 · Other+40 more: $313,980 · Other+40 moreJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $298,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND OF ME…GREENWOOD GENETIC CENTER FOUNDATION: $12,000 · PhilanthropyALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $114,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEAS…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $32,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S…Active Minds Inc: $25,000 · HealthActive Minds IncTHE JED FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthTHE JED FOUNDATIONAmerican Liver Foundation: $18,000 · HealthAmerican Liver Fou…TWLOHA INC: $10,000 · Health+3 more: $8,000 · HealthGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $103,600 · Food & NutritionGREATER C…FREDERICKSBURG REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $15,500 · Food & NutritionFREDERICK…SHELTER FOR HELP IN EMERGENCY INC: $29,000 · Human ServicesKEEP SWIMMING FOUNDATION INC: $21,500 · Human ServicesShare our Spare: $13,500 · Human ServicesYOUTH SERVICES OF GLENVIEWNORTHBROOK: $5,000 · Human Services+3 more: $2,610 · Human ServicesCHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $28,500 · Housing & ShelterWINGS PROGRAM INC: $5,750 · Housing & ShelterRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $19,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$625,080Philanthropy$310,000Health$232,000Food & Nutrition$119,100Human Services$71,610Housing & Shelter$34,250Arts & Culture$19,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $298,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $114,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $103,600 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetRAPPAHANNOCK UNITED WAY INC: $41,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $32,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTER FOR HELP IN EMERGENCY INC: $29,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $28,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetActive Minds Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKEEP SWIMMING FOUNDATION INC: $21,500 over 5y, 31% of budgetRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $19,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $19,000 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetAmerican Liver Foundation: $18,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $16,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFREDERICKSBURG REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $15,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetShare our Spare: $13,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBERNIE'S BOOK BANK: $13,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $12,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWOOD GENETIC CENTER FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFREDERICKSBURG REGIONAL SPCA: $9,700 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetThe Cousteau Society Inc: $9,400 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWINGS FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWINGS PROGRAM INC: $5,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH SERVICES OF GLENVIEWNORTHBROOK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF CHARLOTTESVILLE- ALBEMARLE: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR ENRICHED LIVING INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPAWS INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCharity Navigator: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASPIRITECH NFP: $110 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds RAPPAHANNOCK UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SHELTER FOR HELP IN EMERGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS ↗
  • Who funds Active Minds Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE JED FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KEEP SWIMMING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds American Liver Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC ↗
  • Who funds FREDERICKSBURG REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Share our Spare ↗
  • Who funds BERNIE'S BOOK BANK ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GREENWOOD GENETIC CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TWLOHA INC ↗
  • Who funds FREDERICKSBURG REGIONAL SPCA ↗
  • Who funds The Cousteau Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds WINGS FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL14.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Wagner Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Wagner Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wagner’s filings →

More from the funding graph