Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Venables Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$431k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$155k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.4MPhilanthropy$953kInternational$355kEducation$232kHuman Services$112kHousing & Shelter$15kArts & Culture$11kFood & Nutrition$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $315k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$9.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Schwab Charitable$155,000
The Jesuit Retreat Center of Los Al$100,000
Schools Rule Marin$60,000
Marin Foster Care Association$25,000
Mary's Meals$25,000
St Vincent de Paul Society of Marin$25,000
Haiti on the Rise$10,000
Canal Alliance$10,000
The Jesuit Retreat Center of Los Al$7,600
St Vincent de Paul Society of SF$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
American Red Cross$2,000
Book Exchange of Marin$2,000
Service Education for Village Aware$1,000
ThinkGlobal Arts Foundation$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 64% of grant dollars ($2.0M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 36% that went abroad ($1.1M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IA
OH
NJ
CA
VA
NC
DC
FL

Beyond the US: 36% of all-years giving ($1.1M)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
India$1.1M · 4 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 14 repeat orgs$85k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
13

Total granted

$2.1M
$82k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+10%

Still filing today

64%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesReligionHousing & ShelterHealthPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    Mary's Meals USA Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $240k · revenue +308%
  • TJ
    THE JESUIT RETREAT CENTER OF LOS ALTOS
    3× · 2020–2025 · $228k · revenue +213%
  • CA
    CANAL ALLIANCE
    6× · 2017–2025 · $80k · revenue +229%

Funded once

  • SR
    SCHOOLS RULE
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • JR
    JESUIT REFUGEE SERVICEUS
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • OS
    Old St Mary's Cathedral
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Action Marin

We make it possible for people in marin to achieve well-being by providing the vital services they need. together, we break down the barriers that get in the way of fair and lasting change in service to better outcomes for all.

Human Services
2
Transportation Alternatives for Marin
Public Benefit
3
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
4
Catholic Charities Diocese of San Diego

Catholic Charities provides social services and administers various governmental and social programs. Designed to meet the challenge of the ever-changing community by utilizing spiritual, human and financial resources, our programs enable…

Human Services
5
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
6
Solar Cookers International

The mission of Solar Cookers International is to improve human health, economic well-being, womens empowerment, and the environment by promoting climate-friendly solar cooking for vulnerable populations worldwide.

Environment
7
Global Voice
—
8
Refugees International Inc

Refugees international advocates for lifesaving assistance, human rights, and protection for displaced people and promotes solutions to displacement crisis.

International
9
Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation

Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…

Health
10
Marin Made
Environment
11
International Youth Foundation

Iyf is a global ngo that prepares young people to be healthy, productive and engaged citizens.

International
12
Unitarian Universalist Service Committee Inc

UUSC advances human rights and social justice around the world, partnering with those who confront unjust power structures and mobilizing to challenge oppressive policies. Our work is grounded in the belief that all people have inherent…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Think Global Arts Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Catholic Mission of Western Bengal: $1,119,000 · OtherCatholic Mission of Western BengalTHE JESUIT RETREAT CENTER OF LOS ALTOS: $227,600 · OtherTHE JESUIT RETREAT CENTER OF LOS ALTOSSchools Rule Marin: $215,000 · OtherSchools Rule Marin+16 more: $113,000 · Other+16 moreDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $953,000 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING IN…Mary's Meals USA Inc: $240,000 · InternationalMary's Meals…HAITI ON THE RISE: $95,000 · InternationalHAITI ON THE…International Rescue Committee INC: $15,000 · International+2 more: $5,500 · InternationalCANAL ALLIANCE: $80,000 · ReligionST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF MARIN COUNTY: $42,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $3,000 · Human ServicesMARIN FOSTER CARE ASSOCIATION: $27,500 · Public BenefitHomeward Bound of Marin: $5,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,674,600Philanthropy$953,000International$355,500Religion$80,000Human Services$45,500Public Benefit$27,500Housing & Shelter$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $953,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMary's Meals USA Inc: $240,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetTHE JESUIT RETREAT CENTER OF LOS ALTOS: $227,600 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetHAITI ON THE RISE: $95,000 over 7y, 25% of budgetCANAL ALLIANCE: $80,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF MARIN COUNTY: $42,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetMARIN FOSTER CARE ASSOCIATION: $27,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOME OF HOPE INDIA - US: $5,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHomeward Bound of Marin: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADVOKIDS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBOOK EXCHANGE OF MARIN: $2,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetYouth in Arts: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHINK GLOBAL ARTS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 28% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds Mary's Meals USA Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE JESUIT RETREAT CENTER OF LOS ALTOS ↗
  • Who funds HAITI ON THE RISE ↗
  • Who funds CANAL ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF MARIN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds MARIN FOSTER CARE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds HOME OF HOPE INDIA - US ↗
  • Who funds Homeward Bound of Marin ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds ADVOKIDS ↗
  • Who funds BOOK EXCHANGE OF MARIN ↗
  • Who funds Youth in Arts ↗
  • Who funds THINK GLOBAL ARTS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community FoundationCA17× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Leonard & Beryl Buck Foundation · Heffernan Group Foundation · McNabb Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Venables Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Venables Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Venables Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Venables Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Venables’ filings →

    More from the funding graph