Skip to content

Pennsylvania · Private foundation

The Veloric Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$514k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
30
Grants FY2024
16
Organizations funded FY2023
56%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$105,500
Organizations funded a year
10 to 16
FY2022 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
7
Total assets, FY2024
$6.8M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 56% of the organizations The Veloric Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 50% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving26$394k62%
FY202316$369k56%
FY202210$402kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Philanthropy$6.8MEducation$498kScience & Tech$375kCivil Rights$310kHuman Services$110kHealth$79kCommunity Improvement$56kYouth Development$40kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
NV
PA
NJ
DC
OK
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2022 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 26 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 9 recipients with no EIN on record ($277k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

The Veloric Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 23 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican University: $305,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCouncil for Relationships Inc: $105,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetThomas Jefferson University: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Jewish Committee: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Inc: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetShane Victorino Foundation: $40,000 over 3y, 64% of budgetThe University of the Arts: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDrexel University: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Enterprise Center: $21,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetThe Enterprise Center Community Development Corporation: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMeditation4leadership Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetGlobal Interdependence Center: $12,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetAnti-Defamation League: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWoods Services Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBoys Town Jerusalem Foundation of America: $5,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJewish Relief Agency: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of the Philadelphia Region: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Magical Mila Foundation: $2,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMain Line Art Center: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPolitz Hebrew Academy of Northeast Philadelphia: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFolds of Honor Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Elwyn Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetClean Air Council: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 23.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Daniel B and Florence E Green FoundationPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Daniel B and Florence E Green Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Veloric Foundation with peer funders

About The Veloric Foundation

How much does The Veloric Foundation give?
The Veloric Foundation reported 30 grants totaling $513,900 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 10 and 16 organizations a year over FY2022 to FY2023.
What does The Veloric Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2022 to FY2024, its largest causes are Philanthropy (82%), Education (6%), Science & Tech (4%).
Who are The Veloric Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2022 to FY2024: American University ($306k), Council for Relationships Inc ($105k), Thomas Jefferson University ($100k).
Does The Veloric Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 56% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Veloric Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Veloric Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Daniel B and Florence E Green Foundation, The William Penn Foundation, The Philadelphia Foundation.
Where is The Veloric Foundation based?
The Veloric Foundation is based in PA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Veloric’s filings →

More from the funding graph